Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of decreased arm function after stroke on bone mineral density (BMD) in the proximal humerus. Twenty-five patients were evaluated 1 week after acute stroke and reevaluated 2 months, 7 months, and 1 year after the stroke. BMD of the proximal humerus was measured and the functional status of the paretic arm was assessed. Within 1 year the BMD decreased significantly in the proximal humerus at the paretic side. No significant BMD change was found at the nonparetic side. Patients with an initial completely paralyzed arm lost 27% (P<0.001), those with severe to moderate paresis lost 11% (P<0.001), and patients with minor or no paresis had no significant bone loss in the proximal humerus at the paretic side after 1 year. A statistically significant trend with initial arm function was found both 7 months and 1 year after the stroke at the paretic side (P<0.01). Patients who were paralyzed or had severe to moderate paresis both at inclusion and after 1 year had a larger 1-year bone loss in the proximal humerus than the patients who recovered and these who had only minor impairment throughout the study, 25%, 8%, and 5%, respectively (P-value for linear trend <0.001). We conclude that during the first year after stroke bone mineral is lost in the proximal humerus of the paretic arm, but that the loss depends on the initial degree of paresis. The loss may be prevented if arm function is regained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ramnemark A, Nyberg L, Borssen B, Olsson T, Gustafson Y (1998) Fractures after stroke. Osteoporos Int 8:92–95
Leppala J, Kannus P, Sievanen H, Jarvinen M, Vuori I (1998) Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder (frozen shoulder) produces bone loss in the affected humerus, but long-term bony recovery is good. Bone 22:691–694
Kannus P, Leppala J, Lehto M, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, Jarvinen M (1995) A rotator cuff rupture produces permanent osteoporosis in the affected extremity, but not in those with whom shoulder function has returned to normal. J Bone Miner Res 8:1263–1271
Iversen E, Hassager C, Christiansen C (1989) The effect of hemiplegia on bone mass and soft tissue body composition. Acta Neurol Scand 79:155–159
Hamdy RC, Krishnaswamy G, Cancellaro V, Whalen K, Harvill L (1993) Changes in bone mineral content and density after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 72:188–191
Hamdy RC, Moore SW, Cancellaro VA, Harvill LM (1995) Long-term effects of strokes on bone mass. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 74:351–356
Minaire P (1989) Immobilization osteoporosis: a review. Clin Rheumatol 8 (suppl 2):95–103
Jørgensen L, Jacobsen BK, Wilsgaard T, Magnus JH (2000) Walking after stroke: Does it matter? Changes in bone mineral density within the first 12 months after stroke. A longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int 11:381–387
Scandinavian Stroke Study Group Multicenter trial of hemodilution in ischemic stroke: background and study protocol. Stroke 16:885–890
Lindenstrøm E, Boysen G, Christiansen LW, Hansen BR, Nielsen BW (1991) Reliability of Scandinavian Stroke Scale. Cerebrovasc Dis 1:103–107
Bohannon RW, Smith MB (1987) Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 67:206–207
Prince RL, Price RI, Ho S (1988) Forearm bone loss in hemiplegia: a model for the study of immobilization osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 3:305–310
Ramnemark A, Nyberg L, Lorentzon R, Englund U, Gustafson Y (1999) Progressive hemiosteoporosis on the paretic side and increased bone mineral density in the nonparetic arm the first year after severe stroke. Osteoporos Int 9:269–275
Leblanc AD, Schneider VS, Evans HJ, Engelbretson DA, Krebs JM (1990) Bone mineral loss and recovery after 17 weeks of bed rest. J Bone Miner Res 5:843–850
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jørgensen, L., Jacobsen, B.K. Functional status of the paretic arm affects the loss of bone mineral in the proximal humerus after stroke: A 1-year prospective study. Calcif Tissue Int 68, 11–15 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684997
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684997