Abstract
This paper concerns the differential effects of use of ‘thematic’, rather than abstract (symbolic), content on the ‘Wason selection task’. An effect of thematic content has been reported several times, originally by Wason & Shapiro (1971), but Manktelow & Evans (1979) report five experiments that failed to obtain an effect and argue against the validity of the content effect in general. However, it is pointed out that four of their experiments use a novel content and that there are previous reports of non-effective content in the literature. It is concluded that a particular type of thematic content cannot be treated as a ‘random sample’ of thematic content in general, and that their argument thus rests upon their failure to produce an effect of the specific (’towns and transport’) content used by Wason and Shapiro. This produces an essentially empirical controversy which is settled in two ways. First, Manktelow and Evans’s criticisms of two previous replications are shown to be misleading. Second, an experiment is reported that exactly copies the Wason and Shapiro design and produces a significant effect of content. It is concluded that the Manktelow and Evans result most probably was due to a Type 2 error. Finally, a hypothesis is developed to account for both the effect of certain types of content and the lack of effect of others, including that used in Manktelow and Evans’s first four experiments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bracewell, R.J. & Hidi, S.E. (1974). The solution of an inferential problem as a function of stimulus materials. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 480–488.
Bucci, W. (1978). The interpretation of universal affirmative propositions. Cognition, 6, 55–77.
Evans, J. St B.T. & Lynch, J.S. (1973). Toward a statistical theory of reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 621–635.
Evans, J. St B.T. & Lynch, J.S. (1973). Matching bias in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 391–397.
Feather, N.T. (1964). Acceptance and rejection of arguments in relation to attitude strength, critical ability and intolerance of inconsistency. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 127–136.
Fillenbaum, S. (1975). If: Some uses. Psychological Research, 37, 245–250.
Fillenbaum, S. (1976). Inducements: On the phrasing and logic of conditional promises, threats and warnings. Psychological Research, 38, 231–250.
Frase, L.T. (1966). Validity judgements of syllogisms in relation to two sets of terms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 239–245.
Gilhooly, K.J. & Falconer, W.A. (1974). Concrete and abstract terms and relations in testing a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 355–359.
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Legrenzi, P. & Legrenzi, M.S. (1972). Reasoning and a sense of reality. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 395–400.
Kaufman, H. & Goldstein, S. (1967). The effects of emotional value of conclusions upon distortions in syllogistic reasoning. Psychonomic Science, 7, 367–368.
Lunzer, E.A., Harrison, C. & Davey, M. (1972). The four card problem and the generality of formal reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 326–339.
Manktelow, K.I. & Evans, J. St B.T. (1979). Facilitation of reasoning by realism: effect or non-effect? British Journal of Psychology, 70, 477–488.
Pollard, P. (1979). Human Reasoning: Logical and Nonlogical Explanations. Unpublished PhD thesis, Plymouth Polytechnic.
Pollard, P. & Evans, J. St B.T. (1980). The effects of prior beliefs in reasoning: An associational interpretation. British Journal of Psychology (in press).
Revlin, R. & Leirer, V.O. (1978). The effects of personal biases on syllogistic reasoning: Rational decisions from personalised representations. In R. Revlin & R.E. Mayer (eds.) Human Reasoning. Washington: Winston/Wiley.
Rips, L.J. & Marcus, S.L. (1977). Suppositions and the analysis of conditional sentences. in M.A. Just & P.A. Carpenter (eds.) Cognitive Processes in Comprehension. New York: Wiley.
Roberge, J.J. (1977). Effects of content on inclusive disjunction reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 669–676.
Staudenmayer, H. (1975). Understanding conditional sentences with meaningful propositions. In R.J. Falmagne (ed.) Reasoning: Representation and Process. New York: Wiley.
Van Duyne, P.C. (1974). Realism and linguistic complexity in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 65, 59–67.
Van Duyne, P.C. (1976). Necessity and contingency in reasoning. Acta Psychologica, 40, 85–101.
Wason, P.C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. Foss (ed.) New Horizons in Psychology. London: Penguin.
Wason, P.C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273–281.
Wason, P.C. & Brooks, P.G. (1979). THOG: the anatomy of a problem. Psychological Research, 41, 79–90.
Wason, P.C. & Evans, J. St B.T. (1975). Dual processes in reasoning? Cognition, 3, 141–154.
Wason, P.C. & Golding, E. (1974). The language of inconsistency. British Journal of Psychology, 65, 537–546.
Wason, P.C. & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1972). Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content. London: Batsford.
Wason, P.C. & Shapiro, D. (1971). Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 63–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pollard, P. The effect of thematic content on the ‘Wason selection task’. Current Psychological Research 1, 21–29 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684422
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684422