Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of vascular curvature on three-dimensional reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To characterize the effect of vessel curvature on the geometric accuracy of conventional three-dimensional reconstruction (3DR) algorithms for intravascular ultrasound image data.Background: A common method of 3DR for intravascular ultrasound image data involves geometric reassembly and volumetric interpolation of a spatially related sequence of tomographic cross sections generated by an ultrasound catheter withdrawn at a constant rate through a vascular segment of interest. The resulting 3DR is displayed as a straight segment, with inherent vascular curvature neglected. Most vascular structures, however, are not straight but curved to some degree. For this reason, vascular curvature may influence the accuracy of computer-generated 3DR.Methods: We collected image data using three different intravascular ultrasound catheters (2.9 Fr, 4.3 Fr, 8.0 Fr) during a constant-rate pullback of 1 mm/sec through tubing of known diameter with imposed radii of curvature ranging from 2 to 10 cm. Image data were also collected from straight tubing. Image data were digitized at 1.0-mm intervals through a length of 25 mm. Two passes through each radius of curvature were performed with each intravascular ultrasound catheter. 3DR lumen volume for each radius of curvature was compared to that theoretically expected from a straight cylindrical segment. Differences between 3DR lumen volume of theoreticalversus curved (actual) tubes were quantified as absolute percentage error and categorized as a function of curvature. Tubing deformation error was quantified by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA).Results: Volumetric errors ranged from 1% to 35%, with an inverse relationship demonstrated between 3DR lumen volume and segmental radius of curvature. Higher curvatures (r<6.0 cm) induced greater lumen volume error when compared to lower curvatures (r>6.0 cm). This trend was exhibited for all three catheters and was shown to be independent of tubing deformation artifacts. QCA-determined percentage diameter stenosis indicated no deformation error as a function of curvature. Total volumetric error contributed by tubing deformation was estimated to be 0.05%.Conclusions: Catheter-dependent geometrical error arises in three-dimensionally reconstructed timed linear pullbacks of intravascular ultrasound images due in part to uniplanar vascular curvature. Three-dimensional reconstruction of timed linear pullbacks is robust for vessels with low radii of curvature; however, careful interpretation of three-dimensional reconstructions from timed linear pullbacks for higher radii of curvature is warranted. These data suggest that methods of spatially correct three-dimensional reconstruction of intravascularultrasound images should be considered when more pronounced vascular curvature is present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Becker, A. E. Ultrasound imaging and atherogenesis.Int J. Card. Imaging 4:99–104 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chae, J. S., B. N. Potkin, R. J. Helfant, and R. J. Siegel. Potential limitations of intravascular ultrasound imaging.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 15:28A, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coy, K. M., G. Maurer, and R. J. Siegal. Intravascular ultrasound imaging. A current perspective.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 18:1811–1823, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans, J. L., K.-H. Ng, S. P. Wiet, M. J. Vonesh, W. B. Burns, M. G. Radvany, B. J. Kane, C. J. Davidson, S. I. Roth, B. L. Kramer, S. N. Meyers, and D. D. McPherson. Accurate three-dimensional reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound data: Spatially correct three-dimensional reconstructions.Circulation 93:567–576, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gussenhoven, W. J., C. E. Essed, C. T. Lancee, F. Maitik, P. Frietman, F. C. Van Eymond, J. Reibers, H. Bosch, H. Van Urk, J. Roelandt and N. Born. Arterial characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: An in-vitro study.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 14:947–952, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Honye, J., D. J. Mahon, A. Jain, and C. J. White. Morphological effects of coronary balloon angioplasty in-vivo assessed by intravascular ultrasound imaging.Circulation 85:1012–1025, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Isner, J. M., K. Rosenfield, D. W. Losordo, S. T. DeJesus, S. Kelly, P. Palefsky, R. E. Langevin, S. Razvi, J. O. Pastore, and B. D. Kosowsky. Percutaneous intravascular ultrasound as adjunct to catheter-based interventions: Preliminary experience in patients with peripheral vascular disease.Radiology 175:61–70, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kitney, R. I., K. Rosenfield, and K. Straughan. Three-dimensional visualization of arterial structures using ultrasound and voxel modelling.Int. J. Card. Imaging 4:177–185, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McKay, C. R., Griffith, R. E. Kerber, and M. E. Marcus. Factors influencing intravascular ultrasound image quality and arterial wall morphology.Circulation 80:II-2305, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mintz, G. S., P. Douek, A. D. Pichard, K. M. Kent, L. F. Satler, J. J. Popma, and M. B. Leon. Target lesion calcification in coronary artery disease: An intravascular ultrasound study.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 20:1149–1155, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Neville, R. F., R. W. Hobson, Z. Jamil, G. B. Breitbart, R. J. Anderson, A. L. Bartorelli, and M. B. Leon. Intravascular ultrasonography: Validation studies and preliminary intraoperative observations.J. Vasc. Surg. 13:274–282, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nishimura, R. A., W. D. Edwards, C. A. Warnes, G. S. Reeder, D. R. Holmes, A. T. Tajik, and P. G. Yock. Intravascular ultrasound imaging: In-vitro validation and pathologic correlation.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 16:145–154, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenfield, K., D. W. Losordo, K. Ramaswamy, J. O. Pastore, R. E. Langevin, S. Razvi, B. D. Kosowski, and J. M. Isner. Three-dimensional reconstruction of human coronary and peripheral arteries from images recorded during two-dimensional intravascular ultrasound examination.Circulation 84:1938–1956, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tenaglia, A. N., C. E. Buller, K. B. Kisslo, H. R. Phillips, R. Stack, and C. J. Davidson. Intracoronary ultrasound predictors of adverse outcomes after coronary artery interventions.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 20:1385–1390, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Triulzi, M., D. Gillam, F. Gentile, J. B. Newell, and A. E. Weyman: Normal adult cross-sectional echocardiographic values: Linear dimensions and chamber areas.Echocardiography 1:403–424, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tobis, J. M., J. Mallery, K. Lehman, P. Zalesky, J. Griffith, J. Gessert, M. Moriuchi, D. Mahon, M. L. Dwyer, N. Greep, and W. L. Henry. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of human coronary arteries in-vivo. Analysis of tissue characterizations with comparison to in-vitro histological specimens.Circulation 83:913–926, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yock, P. G., P. J. Fitzgerald, D. T. Linker, and B. A. Angelsen. Intravascular ultrasound guidance for catheter-based coronary interventions.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 17:39B-45B, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiet, S.P., Vonesh, M.J., Waligora, M.J. et al. The effect of vascular curvature on three-dimensional reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images. Ann Biomed Eng 24, 695–701 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684182

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684182

Keywords

Navigation