Skip to main content
Log in

Approaches to effective internal processes to quality management

An initial analysis

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Askling, B. (1997) ‘Quality monitoring as an institutional enterprise.’Quality in Higher Education 3, 1, 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. (1996) ‘Quality as expressed in a Swedish reform of higher education and as viewed by university teachers and leadership.’Tentiary Education and Management 2, 1, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, G. (1997) ‘Quality assurance in Australian higher education: the case of Monash University.’Quality in Higher Education 3, 1, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barblan, A. (1997) Management for Quality: The CRE Programme of Institutional Evaluation: Issues Encountered in the Pilot Phase — 1994/95. In J. Brennan, P. de Vries and R. Williams (eds)Standards and Quality in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J. and Shah, T. (1997) ‘Quality assessment, decision-making and institutional change.’Tertiary Education and Management 3, 2, 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., de Vries, P. and Williams, R. (eds) (1997)Standards and Quality in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., El-Khawas, E. and Shah, T. (1994)Peer Review and the Assessment of Higher Education Quality: An International Perspective. London: Quality Support Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., Williams, R., Harris, R. and McNamara, D. (1997) ‘An institutional approach to quality audit studies.’Higher Education 22, 2, 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B R (1997) ‘Higher education as a self-guiding society.’Tertiary Education and Management 3, 2, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (1986)Academic Standards in Universities (The Reynolds Report). London: CVCP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (1989)Academic Standards in Universities: A Third Report (The Sutherland Report). London: CVCP.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE (1998) ‘Higher education for the 21st century Response to the Dearing Report.’ London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, P. (1997) ‘Academic standards and the quality management debate in British higher education.’ In J. Radford, K. Raaheim, P. de Vries and R. Williams.Quantity and Quality in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D.D. (1977) ‘Accreditation, assessment, anarchy? The evolution of academic quality assurance policies in the United States.’ In J. Brennan, P. de Vries and R. Williams (eds)Standards and Quality in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, L. (1996) ‘Partnerships, quality and standards in higher education.’Quality in Higher Education 2, 2, 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (1997) Power, Legitimacy and Academic Standards, in J. Brennan, P. de Vries and R. Williams (eds)Standards and Quality in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, G. and Partington, P. (1995) Quality in Higher Education: 1995 UpdateCVCP UCoSDA Briefing Paper Eighteen. London: CVCP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Standards Programme (1997)Final Report. London: HEQC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, P.A., Lyman, R.W. and Trow, M. (1995)Accountability of Colleges and Universities: An Essay. New York: Columbia University, Office of the Provost.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. (ed) (1994)What is Quality in Higher Education? Buckingham: SRHE/OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, S. (1996)The Professional Development of Academic Staff in their Role as Teachers. Sheffield: UCoSDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (1996) ‘Editorial quality.’Higher Education 2, 2, 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (1997) ‘Quality is not freel Quality monitoring alone will not improve quality.’Tertiary Education and Management 3, 2, 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, R. and McInnis, C. (1997) ‘Coursework masters degrees and quality assurance: implicit and explicit factors at programme level.’Quality in Higher Education 3, 2, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, B. (1997) ‘The impact of quality monitoring on institutions: a Danish experience at the Copenhagen Business School.’Quality in Higher Education 3, 1, 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luby, A. (1997)Towards an Accreditation System for Professional Development for Academic Practice in Higher Education. Sheffield: UCoSDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R.et al. (1995)Managing for Quality: Stories and Strategies. London: HEQC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R (1997)Enhancing Quality. In F. Coffield and B. Williamson (eds)Repositioning Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE/OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (1997)Higher Education in the Learning Society Report of the National Committee. Middlesex: NCIHE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (1997)Report of the Scottish Committee. Middlesex: NCIHE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, J. (1997) ‘Opportunities for partnership in quality improvement: responding to the challenge of teaching quality assessment in Wales.’Quality in Higher Education 3, 1, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quality Assurance Agency (1998) ‘An agenda for quality.’Higher Quality 1, 3.

  • Shah, T. (1997) ‘Quality management, quality assessment and the decision-making process: the IMHE project on institutional impact.’ In J. Brennan, P. de Vries and R. Williams (eds)Standards and Quality in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Scottish Office (1998)Higher Education for the 21st Century. Response to the Garrick Report. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1994)Academic Reviews and the Culture of Excellence. Sweden: Universitetskanslern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroeijenstijn, A.I. (1995)Improvement and Accountability: Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (1996) ‘Shouldn’t quality be enhanced, rather than assessed?’Tertiary Education and Management 2, 1, 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (1997) ‘The elusive quarry: total quality in higher education.Tertiary Education and Management 3, 2, 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gordon, G. Approaches to effective internal processes to quality management. Tert Educ Manag 4, 295–301 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02679434

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02679434

Keywords

Navigation