Skip to main content
Log in

Internal review to assure quality

Comparative perspectives on evolving practice

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Banta, T.W.et al. (1993)Making a Difference: Outcomes of a Decade of Assessment in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, R.J. and Breier, B.E. (1990)Successful Programme Review: A Practical Guide to Evaluating Programmes in Academic Settings. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. (1996) ‘Quality as expressed in a Swedish reform of higher education and as viewed by university teachers and leadership.’Tertiary Education and Management 2, 1, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, E.G. and Saunders, R.L. (1992)The Evidence for Quality: Strengthening the Tests of Academic and Administrative Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., Frederiks, M. and Shah, T. (1997)Improving the Quality of Education: The Impact of Quality Assessment on Institutions. London: Open University, Quality Support Centre and the Higher Education Funding Council for England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., El-Khawas, E. and Shah, T. (1994)Peer Review and the Assessment of Higher Education Quality: An International Perspective. London: Quality Support Centre, Report No3, Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Khawas, E. (1993) ‘External scrutiny, US style: multiple actors, overlapping roles.’ In T. Becher (ed)Governments and Professional Education. London: SRHE/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P.T. (1993) ‘The role of states and accreditors in shaping assessment practice.’ In T.W. Banta and Associates (eds)Making a Difference: Outcomes of a Decade of Assessment in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, B. and Gentemann, K. (1993) ‘A flexible approach to statewide assessment.’ In T.W. Banta and Associates (eds)Making a Difference: Outcomes of a Decade of Assessment in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, P.A., Lyman, R.W. and Trow, M. (1995)Accountability of Colleges and Universities: An Essay. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Planning Group for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, Final Report. December 1996. CVCP.

  • Niklasson, L. (1996) ‘Game-like regulation of universities: will the new regulatory framework for higher education in Sweden work?’Higher Education 32, 3, 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J.H., Miller, L.H. and Associates (1989)Governing Tomorrow’s Campuses: Perspectives and Agendas. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, T. (1997) ‘Quality management, quality assessment and the decision-making process: the IMHE project on institutional impact.’ In J. Brennan, P. de Vries and R. Williams (eds)Standards and Quality in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F. and Westerheijden, D. (1996) ‘Institutional evaluation and management for quality.’CRE-action, 107, 9–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weusthof, P.J.M. (1995) ‘Internal quality assurance in Dutch universities: an empirical analysis of characteristics and results of self-evaluation.’Quality in Higher Education 1, 3, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Khawas, E., Shah, T. Internal review to assure quality. Tert Educ Manag 4, 95–101 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02679401

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02679401

Keywords

Navigation