Skip to main content
Log in

Quality is not free!

Quality monitoring alone will not improve quality

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Acherman, H. (1995) ‘Meeting quality requirements.’ Abstract of paper, with additional comments, presented at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education (IMHE) Seminar, at OECD, Paris, 4–6 December, 1995.

  • Astin, A.W. (1990) ‘Assessment as a tool for institutional renewal and reform.’ In American Association for Higher Education Assessment ForumAssessment 1990: Accreditation and Renewal. Washington, DC: AAHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barblan, A. (1995) ‘Management for quality: the CRE programme of institutional evaluation: issues encountered in the pilot phase — 1994–1995.’ Paper submitted to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education (IMHE) Seminar, at OECD, Paris, 4–6 December, 1995.

  • Barnett, R. (1988) ‘Entry and exit performance indicators for higher education: some policy and research issues.’Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 13, 1, 16–30, Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. and Franke-Wikberg, S. (1993) ‘Quality assurance in Swedish higher education: shared responsibility.’ Paper presented at the First Biennial Conference and General Conference of the International Network of Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education, Montréal, Canada, 24–28 May.

  • Bell, C. (1995) Introductory remarks of panel moderator on ‘Preliminary lessons to be drawn from the case studies’ at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education (IMHE) Seminar, at OECD, Paris, 4–6 December.

  • Council for National Academic Awards (CNAA) (1990)The Measurement of Value Added in Higher Education. London: CNAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, P.B. (1979)Quality Is Free. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escudero, T. (1995) ‘Evaluation fever at the Spanish University: a critical analysis.’ Paper presented at the 17th Annual EAIR Forum,Dynamics in Higher Education: Traditions Challenged by New Paradigms, Zurich, Switzerland, 27–30 August.

  • Filteau, C.H. (1993) ‘Evaluating the evaluators: does the Ontario Council on Graduate Studies appraisal process work?’ Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education, Bonn, Germany, July.

  • Frederiks, M.M.H., Westerheijden, D.F. and Weusthof, P.J.M. (1993) ‘Self-evaluations and visiting committees: effects on quality assessment in Dutch higher education.’ Paper presented to the 15th EAIR Forum, University of Turku, 15–18 August.

  • Geddes, T. (1992) ‘The total quality initiative at South Bank University.’ Paper presented at the Centre for Higher Education Studies Seminar on Implementing Total Quality Management in Higher Education at the Institute of Education. London, 3 December.

  • Harvey, L. (1990)Critical Social Research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (1994) ‘Continuous quality improvement: a system-wide view of quality in higher education.’ In P.T. Knight (ed)University-Wide Change, Staff and Curriculum Development, Staff and Educational Development Association (SEDA) Paper, 83, May, 47–70.

  • Harvey, L. (1995) ‘The new collegialism: improvement with accountability.’Tertiary Education and Management 1, 2, 153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. and Burrows, A. (1992) ‘Empowering students.’New Academic, Summer, 1ff.

  • Harvey, L. and Knight, P.T. (1996)Transforming Higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE) and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inspectie Hoger Onderwijs (IHO) (1992)De bestuulijk hantering van de resultaten van der externe kwaliteitszorg 1989 in het wettenschappenlijk onderwijs, rapport 1992–8, Zoetermeer: Ministerie van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen, R. and Stensaker, B. (1995) ‘Between governmental demands and institutional needs: peer discretion in external evaluations — what is it used for?’ Paper presented at the 17th Annual EAIR Forum,Dynamics in Higher Education: Traditions Challenged by New Paradigms, Zurich, 27–30 August.

  • Kolb, D.A. (1984)Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchese, T. (1989) ‘Summary comments’ at the FIPSE Conference, Sante Fé, New Mexico, 7 December. InProceedings: Assessment and Accountability in Higher Education. Denver: Education Commission of the States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, P. (1995) ‘A Danish approach to quality in education: the case of Aalborg University.’ Paper, with additional comments, presented at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education (IMHE) Seminar, at OECD, Paris, 4–6 December.

  • Rear, J. (1994) ‘Institutional responses in British higher education.’ In D. Westerheijden, J. Brennan and P. Maasen (eds)Changing Contexts of Quality Assessment: Recent Trends in West European Higher Education. Utrecht: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovio-Johansson, A. and Ling, J. (1995) ‘Comments on the experiences of one university in the CRE programme of institutional evaluation.’ Paper presented at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education (IMHE) Seminar, at OECD, Paris, 4–6 December.

  • Saarinen, T. (1995) ‘Systematic higher education assessment and departmental impacts: translating the effort to meet the need.’Quality in Higher Education 1, 3, 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. and Karlsen, R. (1994)Judging quality? A Study of the External Evaluation of Business Administration Education. Oslo: Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education, October Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, M. and Köllen, E. (1995)Quality Management At The Hogeschool Holland: Towards a Policy of Systematic Quality Assessment. AG Diemen, Hogeschool Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harvey, L. Quality is not free!. Tert Educ Manag 3, 133–143 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02679377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02679377

Keywords

Navigation