Advertisement

Ichthyological Research

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 297–302 | Cite as

Pair territoriality in the longnose filefish,oxymonacanthus longirostris

  • Tomoyuki Kokita
  • Akinobu Nakazono
Article

Abstract

The longnose filefish,Oxymonacanthus longirostris, usually lives in heterosexual pairs, the male and female swimming together and sharing the same territory. Pair territoriality in the species was examined in detail in relation to sexual differences in territorial defense activities. Rigorous pair territoriality was maintained only during the breeding season, although pairs used their home ranges exclusively to a certain extent, during the non-breeding season. The frequency of aggression against other conspecific pairs in the breeding season was higher than in the non-breeding season. Agonistic interactions appear to be over both mates and food resources, the strict pair territoriality in the breeding season possibly being due to mutual mate guarding. In intraspecific aggressive interactions, males usually led their partner females when attacking intruders. The feeding frequency of males was much lower than that of females in the breeding season. Mate removal experiments indicated that females could not defend their original territories solitarily and their feeding frequency decreased. Conversely, males could defend territories solitarily without a decrease in feeding frequency. These results suggest that males contribute most to the defense of the pair territory, with females benefiting from territorial pair-swimming with their partner males.

Key words

Pair territoriality pair-swimming territorial defense Monacanthidae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Akagawa, I., Y. Tsukamoto and M. Okiyama. 1995. Sexual dimorphism and pair spawning into a sponge by the filefish,Brachaluteres ulvarum, with a description of the eggs and larvae. Japan. J. Ichthyol., 41:397–407.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, G. W. 1986. A comparison of monogamy among freshwater and coral-reef fishes. Pages 767–775in T. Ueno, R. Arai. T. Taniuchi and K. Matsuura, eds. Indo-Pacific fish biology: Proc. Sec. Int. Conf. Indo-Pacif. Fish. Icthyol. Soc. Japan, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  3. Barlow, G. W. 1987. Spawning, eggs and larvae of the long-nose filefishOxymonacanthus longirostris, a monogamous corallivore. Env. Biol. Fish., 20:183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow, G. W. 1988. Monogamy in relation to resources. Pages 55–79in C. N. Slobodchikoff, ed. The ecology of social behavior. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  5. Bagenal, T. B. 1966. The ecological and geographical aspects of the fecundity of plaice. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K., 46:743–751.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, J. R. 1982. Optimal group size in territorial animals. J. Theor. Biol., 95:793–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clifton, K. E. 1989. Territory sharing by the Caribbean striped parrotfish,Scarus iserti, patterns of resource abundance, group size and behaviour. Anim. Behav., 37:90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clifton, K. E. 1990. The costs and benefits of territory sharing for the Caribbean coral reef fish,Scarus iserti. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 26:139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fricke, H. W. 1986. Pair swimming and mutual partner guarding in monogamous butterflyfish (Pisces, Chaetodontidae): a joint advertisement for territory. Ethology, 73:307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gore, M. A. 1983. The effect of a flexible spacing system on the social behaviour of a coral reef fish,Chaetodon capistratus. Behaviour, 85:118–145.Google Scholar
  11. Hirshfield, M. F. 1980. An experimental analysis of reproductive effort and cost in the Japanese medaka,Oryzias latipes. Ecology, 61:282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hourigan, T. F. 1989. Environmental determinants of butterflyfish social systems. Env. Biol. Fish., 25:61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kawase, H. and A. Nakazono. 1994. Reproductive behavior of the honeycomb leatherjacket,Cantherhines pardalis (Monacanthidae), at Kashiwajima, Japan. Japan. J. Ichthyol., 41:80–83.Google Scholar
  14. Kawase, H. and A. Nakazono. 1995. Predominant maternal egg care and promiscuous mating system in the Japanese filefish,Rudarius ercodes (Monacanthidae). Env. Biol. Fish., 43:241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kokita, T. and A. Nakazono. 1998. Plasticity in the mating system of the longnose filefish,Oxymonacanthus longirostris, in relation to mate availability. J. Ethol., 16:81–89.Google Scholar
  16. Krebs, J. R. and N. B. Davies. 1993. An introduction to behavioural ecology. 3rd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. 420 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Matsuura, K. 1984. Tetraodontiforms. Pages 357–366, pls. 321–334in H. Masuda, K. Amaoka, C. Araga, T. Uyeno and T. Yoshino, eds. The fishes of the Japanese Archipelago, English text and plate. Tokai Univ. Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  18. Reavis, R. H. and G. W. Barlow. 1998. Why is the coral-reef fishValenciennea strigata (Gobiidae) monogamous? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 43:229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robertson, D. R., N. V. C. Polunin and K. Leighton. 1979. The behavioral ecology of three Indian Ocean surgeonfishes (Acanthurus lineatus, A. leucosternon & Zebrasoma scopas): their feeding strategies, and social and mating systems. Env. Biol. Fish., 4:125–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sano, M., M. Shimizu and Y. Nose. 1984. Food habits of Telcostean reef fishes in Okinawa Islands, southern Japan. Univ. Mus. Univ. Tokyo, Bull. 25:1–128.Google Scholar
  21. Tricas, T. C. 1989. Determinants of feeding territory size in the corallivorous butterflyfish,Chaetodon multicinctus. Anim. Behav., 37:830–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yabuta, S. 1997. Why are so many butterflyfishes monogamous? Pages 65–91in T. Kuwamura and Y. Nakashima, eds. Reproductive strategies in fishes Vol. 2. KAIYUSHA Publishers, Tokyo. (In Japanese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ichthyological Society of Japan 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomoyuki Kokita
    • 1
  • Akinobu Nakazono
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries, Faculty of AgricultureKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations