Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The diagnostic impact of 2D- versus 3D- left ventricular volumetry by MRI in patients with suspected heart failure

  • Published:
Magma: Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology, and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

5. Conclusion

2D MRI measurements of left ventricular morphological and functional parameters show a good agreement to 3D results, thus may be adequate in a clinical routine. If 2D results reveal clear evidence for pathology in terms of LV dilatation, LVEF reduction, or LV hypertrophy, the positive predictive value may be sufficient in a routine clinical setting. However, the sensitivity to detect LV dilatation. LVEF reduction, and LV hypertrophy is limited. Thus, in equivocal results, possible errors inherent in the 2D method need to be considered in any clinical decision-making. In most of these cases, 3D measurements should be performed. Furthermore, the accuracy may be too low for all parameters in patients with regional wall motion abnormalities. Further investigation needs to be done to overcome the systematic errors observed for 2D measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lorenz CH, Walker ES, Morgan VL, Klein SH, Graham TP. Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Res 1999;1:7–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Otterstad JE, Froeland G, St. John Sutton M, Holme I. Accuracy and reproducibility of biplane two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular dimensions and function. Eur Heart J 1997;18:507–13 see comments.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedrich MG, Strohm O, Osterziel KJ, Dietz R. Growth hormone therapy in dilated cardiomyopathy monitored with MRI. Magma 1998;6:152–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellenger NG, Marcus NJ, Davies C, Yacoub M, Banner NR, Pennell DJ. Left ventricular function and mass after orthotopic heart transplantation: a comparison of cardiovasculat magnetic resonance with echocardiography. J Heart Lung Transplant 2000;19:444–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Osterziel KJ, Strohm O, Schuler J, et al. Randomised, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial of human recombinant growth hormone in patients with chronic heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy. Lancet 1998;351:1233–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chuang ML, Hibberd MG, Salton CJ, et al. Importance of imaging method over imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonanceimaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:477–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Benjelloun H, Cranney GB, Kirk KA, Blackwell GG, Lotan CS, Pohost GM. Interstudy reproducibility of biplane cine nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:1413–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dulce MC, Mostbeck GH, Friese KK, Caputo GR, Higgins CB. Quantification of the left ventricular volumes and function with cine MR imaging: comparison of geometric modelswith three-dimensional data. Radiology 1993;188:371–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parisi AF, Moynihan PF, Feldman CL, Folland ED. Approaches to determination of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by real-time two-dimensional echocardiography. Clin Cardiol 1979;2:257–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamaoka O, Yabe T, Okada M, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular mass: comparison of ultrafast computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast left ventriculography. Am Heart J 1993;126:1372–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias G. Friedrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedrich, M.G., Schulz-Menger, J., Strohm, O. et al. The diagnostic impact of 2D- versus 3D- left ventricular volumetry by MRI in patients with suspected heart failure. MAGMA 11, 16–19 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678483

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678483

Keywords

Navigation