Skip to main content
Log in

Liquid water fade margin requirements for infrared and millimeter wave runway imaging sensors in fog

  • Published:
International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Liquid water content and particle size distribution at each ten meters in the vertical for a deep advection fog and a shallow radiation fog are analyzed to determine the liquid water loss at millimeter and infrared wavelengths. The liquid water fade margin is calculated along a three degree glideslope in each fog from the current height above the runway to the touchdown point. Millimeter wave fade margin requirements are calculated from the vertical distribution of bulk liquid water content and infrared fade margin requirements are predicted from the vertical distribution of dropsize. Fog dropsize distributions for both fog layers are well fitted to a gamma distribution with a median drop diameter of approximately 9 microns. Millimeter wave imaging sensors operating in a shallow radiation fog are shown to require less than 1 dB of one-way liquid water fade margin. In the deep advection fog, one-way liquid water fade margin requirements at 8.6 mm, 6.8 mm, and 3.2 mm are predicted to be 1, 2, and 6.7 dB respectively. In comparison, the one-way liquid water fade margin requirements at near, middle, and far infrared wavelengths are two orders of magnitude greater than at millimeter wavelengths and indicate the fog layers are opaque to infrared imaging sensors even near the touchdown point. The specific attenuations predicted in the two fogs are consistent with previously reported values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

5. References

  1. Burgess, M. A. et al, “Synthetic Vision Technology Demonstration” Final Report DOT/FAA/RD-93/40,1, Synthetic Vision Program Office, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D. C., 1993

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burgess, M. A. and R. D. Hayes, “Synthetic Vision- A View in the Fog”, IEEE 11th Digital Avionics System Conference, Seattle, Washington, October 5–8, 1992.

  3. Wallace, J. M. and P. V. Hobbs,Atmospheric Science, An Introductory Survey, Academic Press, Inc., New York, NY, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zak, J. A., “Drop Size Distributions and Related Properties of Fog for Five Locations Measured from Aircraft”, NASA Contractor Report 4585, DOT/FAA/CT-94/02, April, 1994.

  5. Doviak, R. J. and D. S. Zrnic,Doppler Radar and Weather Observations, Academic Press, 1984, p32

  6. Huschke, R. E.,Glossary of Meteorology, American Meteorological Society, 1959, p470

  7. Battan, L. J.,Radar Observation of the Atmosphere, The University of Chicago Press, 1973, p68

  8. Ippolito, L. J., R. D. Kaul, and R. G. Wallace, “Propagation Effects Handbook for Satellite Systems Design”, NASA Reference Publication 1082, December, 1981.

  9. CCIR,Propagation in Non-Ionized Media, Vol. V, XIV Plenary Assembly, Kyoto, Japan, 1978.

  10. Bohren C.F. and D. R. Huffman,Absorption and Scattering of Light Particles, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ray P.,Broadband Complex Refractive Indices of Ice and Water, Appl. Optics11, pp. 1836–1844, 1972.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris, D., “The Attenuation of Electromagnetic Waves Due to Atmospheric Fog”, International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, Vol. 16, No. 6, 1995, pp. 1091–1108

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshall, R.E., de Wolf, D.A. & Kontogeorgakis, C. Liquid water fade margin requirements for infrared and millimeter wave runway imaging sensors in fog. Int J Infrared Milli Waves 18, 1133–1149 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678222

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678222

Keywords

Navigation