Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Leibniz was inducted into the Classical tradition at a very early age and he never lost his enthusiasm for ancient philosophy. In the late 1660s he engaged in a project to reconcile Aristotle with Modern Philosophy. During his stay in Paris, however, he alled himself with the French defenders of ancient philosophy against the Cartesians and made some study of the texts of Plato. He was reluctant to publish his own metaphysical system, fearing the charge of “innovation” and, when he eventually published a version of it, he made much of links with Classical authors. In his later philosophy Leibniz presented himself within the tradition of eclecticism but, it is suggested, his thought is closest to that of Plato and his early followers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

ReferencesReferences 1 primary texts Original language editions

  • Akademie der Wissenschaften,G. W. Leibniz:Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Darmstadt: Akademi Verlag, 1923 ff.; Leipzig, 1938 ff; Berlin, 1950ff. Referred to by series, volumeand page numbers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dam, Charles and Paul Tannery (edd.),Oeuvres de Descartes: Principes (Traduction Française), IX-2, Paris: Vrin, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Couturat, Louis (ed.),Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz, Paris: Alcan, 1903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutens, L. (ed.),Leibnitii…opera omnia, Geneva: Fratres de Tournes, 1768; reprinted Hildesheim: Olms, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann J. E. (ed.),Opera philosophica quae extant, Berlin: Eichler, 1840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucher, Simon,Reponse a la Critique de la Critique de la Recherche de la Vérité sur la Philosophie des Academiciens: Seconde Partie: Ou il est parle de Sentiment de S. Augustin touchant les Academiciens, Paris: Antoine Lambin, 1686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucher, Simon,Dissertations sur la recherche de la vérité, contenant l'histoire et les principles de la philosophie des academiciens, Paris: J. Anisson, 1693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucher de Careil, A.,Nouvelles Lettres et Opuscules Inédits de Leibniz, Paris: Durand, 1857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, C. I. (ed.),Die philosophischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz, 7 vols., Berlin: Weidmann, 1975–90; reprinted Hildesheim: Olms, 1960–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, C. I. (ed.),Leibnizens Mathematische Schriften, Berlin: Asher, 1849–55 reprinted Hildesheim: Olms, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

English language editions

  • Ariew, R. and D. Garber (eds.),G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham, J., R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch (trans.),The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 3 vols, Cambridge: University Press, 1985–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loemker, L. E. (ed. & trans.),Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Philosophical Papers and Letters, 2nd Edition. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. Niall D. and Stuart Brown (eds. & trans.),G.W. Leibniz: Discourse on Metaphysics and Related Writings. Machester: University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, G. H. R. (ed.),Leibniz, Philosophical Writings, London: Dent, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemont, Henry, Jr., and Daniel J. Cook (trans.),Discourse on the Natural Theology of the Chinese: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Monographs of the Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy, No. 4, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. W. (ed. & trans.),Leibniz: System of Theology, London: Burns & Lambert, 1850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrer, A. (ed.) and E. M. Huggard (trans.),Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil., London: Routledge & K. Paul, 1951; reprinted La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, P. P. (ed.),Leibniz Selections, New York: Scribners, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary literature

  • Aiton, Eric,Leibniz: A Biography. Bristol & Boston: Adam Hilger, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bregman, Robert, “The Classical Greek Influence on the Philosophy of Leibniz,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, 1977.

  • Brown, Stuart, “Leibniz and Henry More's Cabbalistic Circle” in Hutton, Sarah (ed.),Henry More (1614–1687): Tercentenary Studies Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Stuart, “Leibniz as Platonist and Academic Skeptic,”Skepsis, forthcoming.

  • Brown, Stuart, “The Seventeenth Century Background” in Jolley, N. (ed.),The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge: University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Stuart, “Platonic Idealism in Modern Philosophy from Malebranche to Berkeley,” forth-coming inThe Cambridge Platonists: From Liberty to Conscience to Physical Causality, eds. J. Rogers et al., Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coudert, Alison,Leibniz and the Kabballah. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, forthcoming.

  • Hutin, Serge, “Leibniz a-t-il subi l'influence d'Henry Moore?,”Studia Leibnitianna 2 (1970): 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, Arthur O.,The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald Ross, G., “Leibniz and Renaissance Neoplatonism,” in Heinekamp, A. (ed.),Leibniz et la Renaissance, Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa, vol. 24. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Carolyn, “The Vitalism of Anne Conway: Its Impact on Leibniz's Concept of a Monad,”Journal of the History of Philosophy 7 (1979): 255–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politella, J., “Platonism, Aristotelianism and Cabbalism in the Philosophy of Leibniz,” Ph. D. thesis, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Richard H.,The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Richard H., “Leibniz and the French Sceptics,”Revue Internationale de Philosophie 67–77 (1966): 228–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Richard H. (ed.),Leibniz, Mysticism and Religion. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, forthcoming.

  • Rabbe, F.,Étude philosophique, L'abbé Simon Foucher chanoine de la Sainte Chappelle de Dijon, Paris: Didier, 1867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrecker, Paul, “Leibniz and the Timaeus,”Review of Metaphysics 4 (1951): 495–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, Tom (ed.),The Rise of Modern Philosophy: The Tension between the New and Traditional Philosophies from Machiavelli to Leibniz. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teltscher, Helga-Beate, “Verwandte Strukturen im Systemdenken von Cusanus und Leibniz,”Studia Leibnitiana (1973): 149–164.

  • Watson, Richard A.,The Breakdown of Cartesian Metaphysics, Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Catherine,Leibniz's Metaphysics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, Robert, “Der Cardinal Nicholaus Cusanus als Vorläufer Leibnitzens,”, inStudien und Kritiken zur Philosophie und Aesthetik, vol. I, Wien: Braumüller, 1870.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, S. Leibniz and the classical tradition. International Journal of the Classical Tradition 2, 68–89 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678171

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678171

Keywords

Navigation