Advertisement

Atomic Energy

, Volume 86, Issue 5, pp 345–357 | Cite as

Influence of cascade micropores on diffusion fluxes of point defects in reactor vessels materials

  • Yu. R. Kevorkyan
  • Yu. A. Nikolaev
  • A. V. Nikolaeva
Articles

Abstract

The main mechanism determining radiation embrittlement of the materials of reactor vessels are considered to be a change in the cohesive strength of the grain boundaries resulting from the segregation of surface-active impurities (mainly phosphorous), hardening of the material by precipitations of a second phase, segregation of impurities onto interphase surfaces of the precipitate-matrix interface and an associated increase in the hardening effect of the radiation precipitations. The materials of reactor vessels are irradiated at a temperature of 250–300°C which is insufficiently high for the thermal activation of diffusion processes. When describing the process of an accelerated diffusion of copper and phosphorous atoms by irradiation, a model has so far normally been used which neglects the cascade mechanism for generating defects and also the formation and evolution of point defect complexes. Individual studies taking account of the reduction in the efficiency of generating point defects in cascades due to the formation of micropores contain certain deficiencies. The present work is devoted to developing and analyzing a satisfactory model of radiation damage which is to a considerable extent free of these deficiencies.

Keywords

Point Defect Diffusion Flux Interstitial Atom Vacancy Cluster Vacancy Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yu. A. Nikolaev, A. V. Nikolaeva, O. O. Zabusov, et al., “Radiation-induced and thermally induced adsorption of phosphorous on grain boundaries in low-alloy steel”,Fiz. Met. Metalloved.,81, No. 1, 120–128 (1996).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. R. Odette, “On the dominant mechanism of irradiation embrittlement of reactor pressure vessel steels”,Scripta Metall.,17, 1183–1188 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. A. Gurovich, E. A. Kuleshova, Yu. A. Nikolaev, and Ya. I. Shtrombakh, “Assessment of relative contributions from different mechanisms to radiation embrittlement of reactor pressure vessel steels”,J. Nucl. Mater.,246, 91–120 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu. R. Kevorkyan,Physical Aspects of Radiation Resistance of Reactor Vessel Materials of Nuclear Power Plants (a Review) [in Russian], GKIAÉ, Moscow (1989).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu. R. Kevorkyan, “Mechanisms of radiation embrittlement of reactor vessel materials of nuclear power plants: 1. Model of hardening the matrix by copper precipitation”,Preprint No. IAÉ-4879/11 [in Russian], I. V. Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy, Moscow (1989).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. V. Nikolaeva, Yu. A. Nikolaev, and A. M. Kryukov, “The contribution of grain boundary effects to low-alloy steel irradiation embrittlement”,J. Nucl. Mater.,218, 85–93 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. E. Stoller, “Pressure vessel embrittlement predictions based on a composite model of copper precipitation and point defect clustering”,ASTM STP,1270, 25–58 (1996).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. N. Seidman, R. S. Averbach, and R. Benedek, “Displacement cascades. Dynamics and atomic structure”,Phys. Stat. Solidi B,144, 85–104 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. E. Stoller, “Primary damage formation in irradiated materials”,JOM,48, 23–27 (1996).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Beeler,Radiation Effects Computer Experiments, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford (1983).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. G. Doran, “Computer simulation of displacement spike annealing”,Rad. Effects.,2, 249–267 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. A. Platonov, V. F. Krasnoshtanov, and Yu. R. Kevorkyan, “Modeling the processes of formation and annealing of defects in damage regions created by cascades of collisions in alpha iron”,At. Énerg.,39, No. 4, 260–264 (1975).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu. R. Kevorkyan, “Some questions of the cascade mechanism of generating defects in materials”,Vopr. Atom. Nauk. Tekh.,1, No. 9, 24–30 (1979).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Kitagawa, K. Yamakawa, H. Fukushima, et al., “Ion-irradiation experiment for the fundamental studies of damage evolution of fusion materials”,J. Nucl. Mater.,133–134, 395–399 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. A. Kirk, I. M. Robertson, M. L. Jenkins, et al., “The collapse of defect cascades to dislocation loops”,J. Nucl. Mater.,149, 21–28 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    É. B. Brodkin, A. V. Borodin, V. I. Vikhrov, and A. V. Khrustalev, “Calculated and experimental characteristics of the field of fast neutrons in the space surrounding the vessels of VVÉR-440 and VVÉR-1000 reactors”, in:Proc. of Fourth Sci. Conf. on Shielding of Nuclear-Technology Devices from Ionizing Radiations [in Russian], Tomsk (1985).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu. P. Kevorkyan, “Modeling and computer investigation of the processes of structural damage in iron during neutron irradiation”,Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Mathematical and Physical Sciences [in Russian], I. V. Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy, Moscow (1975).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. I. Samsonov, I. F. Pryadko, and L. F. Pryadko,Configuration Model of Matter [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1971).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. W. Finnis and J. E. Sinclair, “A simple empirical N-body potential for transition metals”,Phil. Mag. A,50, No. 1, 45–55 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Huntingdon in:Solid State Physics, Vol. 7, F. Seitz and D. Turnbull (eds.) Academic Press, New York (1984), p. 274.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. P. Simonen, “Predicted irradiation effects on alloy aging kinetics”, in:Proc. Intern. Conf. on Nuclear Power Plant, Aging, Availability Factor, and Reliability Analysis, San Diego, CA, 1985, publ. by American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH (1985), pp. 157–163.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Oikawa, “Review of lattice diffusion of substantial impurity in iron. A summary report”,Tohoku University Technology Report,47, 215–224 (1982).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    G. E. Lucas, G. R. Odette, P. Lombrozo, and J. W. Sheckherd, “Effects of composition, microstructure, and temperature on irradiation hardening of pressure vessel steels”,ASTM STP,870, 900–930 (1985).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. D. Amaev, A. M. Kryukov, V. I. Levit, and M. A. Sokolov, “Radiation stability of VVÉR-440 vessel materials”,ASTM STP,1170, 9–29 (1993).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. R. Kevorkyan
    • 1
  • Yu. A. Nikolaev
    • 1
  • A. V. Nikolaeva
    • 2
  1. 1.Russian Scientific Center Kurchatov InstituteRussia
  2. 2.IBRAÉRussian Academy of SciencesRussia

Personalised recommendations