Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Globalisation: Source of woe or source of wealth?

  • Published:
Economic Bulletin

Conclusion

Because technology and innovations are only developed by highly qualified, workers, an appropriate education and R&D policy is necessary to secure the advantages of globalisation in the long term and to translate them into an increase in real income. The industrialised countries can only maintain and increase their high wage levels if they increase their technological capacity and their stock of human capital. A reduction of public expenditure on R&D and education, which are essentially investments in technological capacity and human capital, is thus not the answer to the challenges of globalisation. This is especially true because a share of the high real income in the industrialised countries can be traced back to innovation rents, which will be lost if the pace of innovation slows down in comparison to the newly industrialising countries.

Globalisation offers enormous economic opportunities, but also entails risks for low-skilled workers. The latter can, however, be combated, in particular by an appropriate education policy. Of course, globalisation demands mobility and flexibility on the part of the individual. Defensive reactions are not the answer—they will lead only to the feared race to the bottom. Countries which exploit the opportunities presented by globalisation through an increase in their education and R&D endeavours can compete in the other race, i.e. the race to the top.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

|o

  1. Fritz Franzmeyer, Ludger Lindlar and Harald Trabold, Employment and Social Policies under International Constraints, Den Haag, 1996.

  2. The degree of openness of a national economy is defined as the sum of the share of exports in gross production plus the share of imports in total domestic demand divided by two.

  3. Also see Fritz Franzmeyer, Ludger Lindlar and Harald Trabold, loc. cit., chapter 3.

  4. The extremely high figure for Belgium-Luxembourg essentially represents portfolio investments for tax reasons.

  5. Cf. George Borjas, The Economics of Immigration, in:Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 31, 1994, pp. 1667–1717.

  6. For Germany see: John Haisken-DeNew, Migration and the Interindustry Wage Structure in Germany, Berlin/Heidelberg, 1996.

  7. Cf. Stephen Nickell and Brian Bell, The Collapse in Demand for the Unskilled and Unemployment Across the OECD, in:Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, 1995, pp. 40–61.

  8. Cf. OECD, Lifelong Learning for All, Paris, 1996.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trabold, H. Globalisation: Source of woe or source of wealth?. Economic Bulletin 34, 3–8 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02671717

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02671717

Keywords

Navigation