Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study used computed tomography (CT) imaging to determinein vivo mass, center of mass (CM), and moments of inertia (Icm) about the CM of discrete segments of the human torso. Four subjects, two males and two females, underwent serial transverse CT scans that were collected at 1-cm intervals for the full length of the trunk. The pixel intensity values of transverse images were correlated to tissue densities, thereby allowing trunk section mass properties to be calculated. The percentage of body mass observed by vertebral levels ranged from 1.1% at T1 to 2.6% at L5. The masses of the upper, middle, and lower trunk segments as percentages of body mass were estimated to be 18.5, 12.2, and 10.7%, respectively. The whole trunk mass was estimated to comprise 41.6% of the total body mass. Transverse vertebral CM values were found to lie anterior to their respective vertebral centroids by up to 5.0 cm in the lower thoracic region. For the upper, middle, and lower trunk segments, the average CM positions were found to be 25.9, 62.5, and 86.9% of the distance from the superior to inferior ends of the trunk. The upper and middle trunk CMs corresponded to approximately 4.0 cm anterior to T7/T8 vertebral centroid levels and 1.0 cm anterior to L3/L4 vertebral centroid levels, respectively. For the whole trunk, the CM was 52.7% of the distance from the xiphoid process and approximately 2.0 cm anterior to L1/L2 vertebral centroid levels. Variations in CM and 1cm values were observed between subject, but these were within the range of previous reports of body segment parameters. Differences from previous studies were attributable to variations in boundary definitions, measurement techniques, population groups, and body states (live versus cadaver) examined. The disparity between previous findings and the findings of this study emphasizes the need to better define the segmental properties of the trunk so that improved biomechanical representation of the body can be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackland, T. R., P. W. Henson, and D. A. Bailey. The uniform density assumption: its effect upon the estimation of body segment inertial parameters.Int. J. Sports Biomech. 4:146–155, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson, G. B. J., R. Ortengren, and P. Herberts. Quantitative electromyographic studies of back muscle activity related to posture and loading.Orthop. Clin. North Am. 8:85, 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Asmussen, E., and K. Klaussen. Form and function of the erect spine.Clin Orthop. 25:55, 1962.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berland, L. L., ed. Image quality. In:Practical CT: Technology and Technique. New York: Raven Press, 1987, 288 pp. 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blanton, P. L., and N. L. Biggs. Density of fresh and embalmed human compact and cancellous bone.Am. J. Phys. Anthr. 29:39–44, 1968.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Braune, W., and O. Fischer, Über den Schwerpunkt des menschlichen Körpers, mit Rucksicht auf die Austrustung des deutschen Infanteristen. Abhandlungen der mathematische-physichen Classe der Konigl.Sashsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 26:561–672, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks R. A., L. G. Mitchell, C. M. O'Connor, and G. Di Chiro. On the relationship between computed tomography numbers and specific gravity.Phys. Med. Biol. 26:141–147, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Burwell, R. G., N. J. James, F. Johnson, J. K. Webb, and Y. G. Wilson. Standardised trunk asymmetry scores.J. Bone Joint Surg. 65B:452–463, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Canada Fitness Survey, Fitness and Lifestyle in Canada, (3rd ed.), Ottawa, Fitness and Amateur Sport, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chandler, R. F., C. E. Clauser, J. T. McConville, H. M. Reynolds, and J. W. Young. Investigation of inertial properties of the human body,AMRL Technical Report (TR-74-137), 1975.

  11. Clarys, J. P., and M. J. Marfell-Jones. Anatomical segmentation in humans and the prediction of segmental masses from intra-segmental anthropometry.Hum. Biol. 58:771–782, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clauser, C. E., J. T. McConville, and J. W. Young. Weight, volume and center of mass of segments of the human body.AMRL Technical Report (TR-69-70), 1969.

  13. Dempster, W. T. Space requiremetns of the seated operator.WADC Technical Report (TR-55-159), 1955.

  14. Duval-Beaupère, G., and G. Robain. Visualization on full spine radiographs of the anatomical connections of the centres of the segmental body mass supported by each vertebra and measured in vivo.Int. Orthop. 11:261–269, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Erdmann, W. S., and T. Gos. Density of trunk tissues of young and medium age people.J. Biomech. 23:945–947, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldberg, C., and F. E. Dowling. Handedness and scoliosis convexity: a reappraisal.Spine 15:61–64, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harless, E. Die statischen Momente der menschlichen Gliedmassen. Abhandlungen der Mathemat.Physic kalischen Classe der Koeniglichen Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 8, 69–96, 257–294, 1860.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harman, E. A., P. N. Frykman, E. R. Clagett, and W. J. Kraemer. Intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressures during lifting and jumping.Med. Sci. Sports Exer. 20(2):195–201, 1988.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang, H. K., and F. R. Suarez. Evaluation of cross-sectional geometry and mass density distributions of humans and laboratory animals suing computerized tomography.J. Biomech. 16(10):821–832, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, H. K., and S. C. Wu. The evaluation of mass densities of the human body in vivo from CT scans.J. Biomech. 6:337–343, 1976.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen, R. K.. Human morphology: its role in the mechanics of movement.J. Biomech. 26(Suppl. 1.):81–94, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jensen, R. K., and P. Fletcher. Distribution of mass to the segments of elderly males and females.J. Biomech. 27(1): 89–96, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Klausen, K., and B. Rasmussen. On the location of the line of gravity in relation to L5 in standing.Acta Phys. Scnad. 72:45–52, 1968.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kohda, E., and N. Shigematsu. Measurement of lung density by computed tomography: implication for radiotherapy.Keio J. Med. 38(4):454–463 1989.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kulwicki, P. V., Schlei, E. J. and Vergamini, P. L. Weightless man: Self-rotation techniques.AMRL Technical Documentary Report (TR-62-129). 1962.

  26. Liu, Y. K. and Wickstrom, J. K.Perspectives in Biomedical Engineering. Kenedi (Ed.) University Park Press, Baltimore, 1973, pp. 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parks, J. L.An Electromyographic and Mechanical Analysis of Selected Abdominal Exercises. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, 1959.

  28. Pearsall, D. J., and Reid, J. G. Line of gravity relative to upright vertebral posture.Clin. Biomech. 7:80–86, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pearsall, D. J. and Reid, J. G. The study of human body segment parameters in biomechanics: an historical review and current status report.Sports Med. 18:126–140, 1994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pearsall, D. J., Reid, J. G. and Ross, R. Inertial properties of the human trunk of males determined from magnetic responance imaging.Annals Biomed. Eng. 22:692–706, 1994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Plagenhoef, S., Evans, F. G. and Abdelnour, T. Anatomical data for analyzing human motion.Res. Quart. Exer. Sport, 54:169–178, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reid, J. G. Physical properties of the human trunk as determined by computed tomography.Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 65:246–250, 1984.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shi, X., Zheng, Z., Shangy, H., and Du, G. Determination of the density of human tissues: one of the discussions on the parameters of inertia of the Chinese human body.J. Norman Bethune Univ. Med. Sci., 16:543–546, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tesh, K. M., Dunn, J. S. and Evans, J. H. The abdominal muscles and vertebral stability.Spine 12:501–508, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wei, C., Jensen, R. K. The application of segment axial density profiles to a human body inertia model. 28:103–108, 1995.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Whitsett, C. E. Some Dynamio Response Characteristics of Weightless Man. MS Thesis, U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, (AMRL-TR-63-18, AD 412 541), 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Woodward, H. W. and White, D. R. The composition of body tissues.Brit. J. Rad., 59:1209–1219, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Young, J. W., Chandler, R. F., Snow, C. C., Robinette, K. M., Zehner, G. F. and Lofberg, M. S. Anthropometric and mass distribution characteristics of the adult female. FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute, Technical Report, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 1983

  39. Zatsiorsky, V., Selyanov, V., and Chugunova, L. In vivo body segment inertial parameters determination using a gamma-scanner methods. In: Berme N, Capozzo A, editors. Biomechanics of Human Movement: Application in Rehabilitation, Sports and Ergonomics. Worthington: Bertec Corporation, 1990, pp. 86–202.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Education, McGill University, 475 Pine Avenue West, H2W 1S4, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

    David J. Pearsall

  2. School of Physical and Health Education, and Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

    J. Gavin Reid

  3. Department of Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    Lori A. Livingston

Authors
  1. David J. Pearsall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Gavin Reid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lori A. Livingston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearsall, D.J., Reid, J.G. & Livingston, L.A. Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography. Ann Biomed Eng 24, 198–210 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02667349

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02667349

Key words

Search

Navigation