Review of World Economics

, 140:496 | Cite as

On the microstructure of the german export boom: Evidence from establishment panel data, 1995–2002

Shorter Papers


This paper uses an unbalanced panel data set for exporting firms from manufacturing industries in one German federal state, Lower Saxony, to investigate the microstructure of the recent export boom. Looking at data for 1995/96–2001/02 it is demonstrated that a considerable number of plants start and stop exporting in each year, but that most of the export dynamics is due to positive and negative changes of exports in plants that continue exporting. A small fraction made of 4–5 percent of all exporting plants is responsible for around 70 to 80 percent of the gross increase in exports. Firms with expanding and contracting exports are found simultaneously in all broad sectors, technology classes and firm size classes. Patterns of export behavior differ widely between the plants over the periods investigated. JEL no. F14, E32


Exports business cycle establishment panel data 


  1. Bernard, A. B., and J. B. Jensen (2002). Entry, Expansion, and Intensity in the US Export Boom, 1987–1992. Mimeo. Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, June.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard, A. B., and J. Wagner (1997). Exports and Success in German Manufacturing.Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 133 (1): 134–157.Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, A. B., and J. Wagner (2001). Export Entry and Exit by German Firms.Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 137 (1): 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (ed.) (2002).Zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands 2002. Bonn: BMBF.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, S. J., J. Haltiwanger, and S. Schuh (1996). Small Business and Job Creation: Dissecting the Myth and Reassessing the Facts.Small Business Economics 8 (4): 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerlach, K., and J. Wagner (1993). Gross and Net Employment Flows in Manufacturing Industries.Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 113 (1): 17–28.Google Scholar
  7. Girma, S., D. Greenaway, and R. Kneller (2003). Export Market Exit and Performance Dynamics: A Causality Analysis of Matched Firms.Economics Letters 80 (2): 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grupp, H. et al. (2000).Hochtechnologie 2000—Neudefinition der Hochtechnologie für die Berichterstattung zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands. Karlsruhe and Hannover: ISI and NIW.Google Scholar
  9. Heckman, J. J. (2001). Micro Data, Heterogeneity, and the Evaluation of Public Policy: Nobel Lecture.Journal of Political Economy 109 (4): 673–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haltiwanger, J. (1997). Measuring and Analyzing Aggregate Fluctuations: The Importance of Building from Microeconomic Evidence.Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 79 (3): 55–77.Google Scholar
  11. OECD (1987). The Process of Job Creation and Destruction. InOECD, Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  12. StataCorp (2003).Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
  13. Strotmann, H., and J. Wagner (1999). Exportdynamik in der baden-württembergischen und der niedersächsischen Industrie—Ein Vergleich mit Hilfe amtlicher Betriebspaneldaten. In U. Schasse und J. Wagner (Hrsg.),Entwicklung von Arbeitsplätzen, Exporten und Produktivität im interregionalen Vergleich—Empirische Untersuchungen mit Betriebspaneldaten. NIW-Vortragsreihe, Band 13. Hannover: Niedersächsisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  14. Wagner, J. (1993). Firm Size, Firm Growth, and Export Performance—Evidence from Longitudinal Data for German Establishments.Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 211 (5/6): 417–420.Google Scholar
  15. Wagner, J. (1995a). Exports, Firm Size, and Firm Dynamics.Small Business Economics 7 (1): 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wagner, J. (1995b). Firm Size and Job Creation in Germany.Small Business Economics 7 (4): 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wagner, J. (1998). Der Exportboom 1996/97: Ein Blick hinter die Kulissen mit Betriebsdaten aus der niedersächsischen Industrie.Statistische Monatshefte Niedersachsen 52 (12): 689–697.Google Scholar
  18. Wagner, J. (2000). Firm Panel Data from Official Statistics.Schmollers Jahrbuch/Journal of Applied Social Science Studies 120 (1): 143–150.Google Scholar
  19. Wagner, J. (2001a). Zur Mikrostruktur des Exportbooms. In U. Schasse und J. Wagner (Hrsg.),Regionale Wirtschaftsanalysen mit Betriebspaneldaten—Ansätze und Ergebnisse. NIW-Vortragsreihe, Band 14. Hannover: Niedersächsisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  20. Wagner, J. (2001b). A Note on the Firm Size-Export Relationship.Small Business Economics 17 (4): 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wagner, J. (2002). The Causal Effects of Exports on Firm Size and Labor Productivity: First Evidence from a Matching Approach.Economics Letters 77 (2): 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wagner, J. (2003). Unobserved Firm Heterogeneity and the Size-Export Nexus: Evidence from German Panel Data.Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 139 (1): 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Giel Institute for World Economics 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EconomicsUniversity of LueneburgLueneburgGermany

Personalised recommendations