Abstract
Previous treatments have assumed that small fluctuations in contact window dimensions between devices are chiefly responsible for the scatter in contact resistance data. Although this is plausible, it is shown in this paper that the source of this scatter is variation in contact resistivity, ρc, from resistor to resistor. It is further suggested that ρc is Cauchy distributed. Since standard deviation is in theory infinite for a Cauchy distribution, very high values of resistance at a contact window would occur with much greater frequency than common sense might suggest.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ρ c :
-
contact resistivity
- R :
-
resistance
- T :
-
wafer thickness
- A :
-
wafer area
- ρ B :
-
bulk resistivity
- L :
-
contact window length
- α:
-
dimensionless contact resistivity, ρc/ρB L
- σ :
-
standard deviation
- σR :
-
standard deviation in resistance
- σ l :
-
standard deviation in contact window length
- α ρc :
-
standard deviation in contact resistivity
- N :
-
number of observations
- C(N,m) :
-
binomial coefficient
- f(R) :
-
probability density ofR
- αμ:
-
parameters of Cauchy distribution
- P :
-
probability
- R :
-
average resistance
References
S. S. Winterton and N. G. Tarr, Semicond. Sci. and Tech.6, 1061 (1991).
H. H. Berger, Solid-State Electron.15, 145 (1972).
S. J. Proctor, L. W. Linholm and J. A. Mazer, IEEE Trans Electron Devices30, 1535 (1983).
W. M. Loh, S. E. Swirhun, T. A. Schreyer, R. M. Swanson and K. C. Saraswat, Proc. IEDM, 586 (1985).
H. H. Berger, J. Electrochem. Soc.119, 507 (1972).
G. P. Carver, J. J. Kopanski, D. B. Novotny and R. A. Forman, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices35, 489 (1988).
C. P. Ho, S. E. Hansen and P. M. Fahey, SUPREM III—a program for integrated circuit process modelling and simulation, Tech. Rep. SEL84-001, Stanford Univ. (1984).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winterton, S.S., Smy, T.J. & Tarr, N.G. On the source of scatter in contact resistance data. J. Electron. Mater. 21, 917–921 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02665549
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02665549