Abstract
An examination has been carried out of the ability of projectiles of three different geometries to perforate plates of an age hardened aluminum alloy. It was found that flat-ended projectiles perforate the target with greater ease than projectiles with more rounded ends. The results are discussed in terms of the ability of a particular projectile geometry to promote adiabatic shear during penetration and the mode of fracture when projectile breakout occurs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. S. Rinehart and J. Pearson:Behavior of Metals Under Impulsive Loads, Dover Publications, New York, 1965.
W. Goldsmith:Impact, Edward Arnold, London, 1960.
T. A. C. Stock and K. R. L. Thompson:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 219–24.
T. A. C. Stock and A. L. Wingrove:J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 1971, vol. 13, pp. 110–15.
R. F. Recht:J. Appl. Mech., 1964, vol. 31, pp. 189–93.
A. L. Wingrove:J. Phy. D., 1972, vol. 5, pp. 1294–1304.
Blanking and Piercing. A Metallographic Study of the Mechanisms of Constrained Shear, The Production Engineering Research Association of Great Britain, Report No. 93, 1961.
A. L. Wingrove:J. Aust. Inst. Met., 1971, vol. 16, pp. 67–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wingrove, A.L. The influence of projectile geometry on adiabatic shear and target failure. Metall Trans 4, 1829–1833 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02665409
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02665409