Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of projectile geometry on adiabatic shear and target failure

  • Mechanical Behavior
  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An examination has been carried out of the ability of projectiles of three different geometries to perforate plates of an age hardened aluminum alloy. It was found that flat-ended projectiles perforate the target with greater ease than projectiles with more rounded ends. The results are discussed in terms of the ability of a particular projectile geometry to promote adiabatic shear during penetration and the mode of fracture when projectile breakout occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. S. Rinehart and J. Pearson:Behavior of Metals Under Impulsive Loads, Dover Publications, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Goldsmith:Impact, Edward Arnold, London, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. A. C. Stock and K. R. L. Thompson:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 219–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. A. C. Stock and A. L. Wingrove:J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 1971, vol. 13, pp. 110–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. F. Recht:J. Appl. Mech., 1964, vol. 31, pp. 189–93.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. L. Wingrove:J. Phy. D., 1972, vol. 5, pp. 1294–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanking and Piercing. A Metallographic Study of the Mechanisms of Constrained Shear, The Production Engineering Research Association of Great Britain, Report No. 93, 1961.

  8. A. L. Wingrove:J. Aust. Inst. Met., 1971, vol. 16, pp. 67–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wingrove, A.L. The influence of projectile geometry on adiabatic shear and target failure. Metall Trans 4, 1829–1833 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02665409

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02665409

Keywords

Navigation