Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical features of third open-heart valve surgery at the same valve position

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Recently, there has been an increase in case of repeated open-heart valve surgery and the clinical results of the second surgery are only slightly worse than those of the first surgery. However, clinical results of the third open-heart valve surgery at the same position are rarely reported. Clinical features of third open-heart valve surgery at the same position are discussed in this study.Methods: Between 1995 and 2004, 16 patients underwent third open-heart valve surgery at the same valve position under cardiopulmonary bypass. The average age of the 16 patients, 12 females and 4 males, was 56±15 years. Clinical features of the 16 cases were retrospectively analyzed.Results: Mechanical valve nonstructural dysfunction was the most common valve malady, followed by bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. The duration of surgery from skin incision to establishment of the cardiopulmonary bypass was 94±42 minutes. Myocardial ischemia time was 137±38 minutes and extracorporeal circulation time was 212±82 minutes. Early mortality was seen in 1 patient (6.25%) and late mortality was seen in 1 patient.Conclusion: Mechanical valve nonstructural valve dysfunction leads to repeated valve surgery. The clinical results of the third open-heart valve surgery at the same valve position are acceptable, and the mid-term survival is excellent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lewis JW Jr, Webb CR, Pickard SD, Lehman J, Jacobsen G. The increased need for a permanent pacemaker after reoperative cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 116: 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wauthy P, Goldstein JP, Demanet H, Deuvaert FE. Redo valve surgery nowadays: What have we learned? Acta Chir Belg 2003; 103: 475–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guideline for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 932–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Misawa Y, Saito T, Konishi H, Oki S, Kaminishi Y, Takahashi H, et al. When and how does nonstructural mechanical prosthetic heart valve dysfunction occur? Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 51: 355–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Misawa Y, Konishi H, Saito T, Fuse K. Paravalvular leakage causing hemolytic anemia at 8–9 years after mitral valve replacement. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 50: 530–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vallely MP, Hughes CF, Bannon PG, Hendel PN, French BG, Bayfield MS. Composite graft replacement of the aortic root after previous cardiac surgery: A 20-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 851–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirzner CF, Correia AR, Azevedo OM Jr, Maranhao MV, Goncalves JR, Kirzner MS, et al. Low-dose aprotinin in heart valve reoperations. J Heart Valve Dis 2001; 10: 222–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yaginuma G, Ottomo M, Abe K, Saiki Y, Okada Y, Sakurai M, et al. Mitral exposure technique for redo cardiac surgery. A left mediastinal pleurotomy and minimal adhesiotomy method. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2001; 42: 501–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayfield WR. Endoscopic repeat sternotomy. Heart Surg Forum 1998; 1: 26–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Byrne JG, Karavas AN, Adams DH, Aklog L, Aranki SF, Couper GS, et al. Partial upper re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement or re-replacement after previous cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 18: 282–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Imazeki T, Irie Y, Katayama Y, Kiyama H, Murai N, Sato Y, et al. Re-do surgery with minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS): mitral valve replacement 6 years after open mitral commissurotomy (Eng abstr). Kyobu Geka 1998; 51: 853–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Steimle CN, Bolling SF. Outcome of reoperative valve surgery via right thoracotomy. Circulation 1996; 94(9 Suppl): II126–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tribble CG, Killinger WA Jr, Harman PK, Crosby IK, Nolan SP, Kron IL. Anterolateral thoracotomy as an alternative to repeat median sternotomy for replacement of the mitral valve. Ann Thorac Surg 1987; 43: 380–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yasui H, Osada H, Ando N, Koyanagi H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 1996: Annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Committee of science. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 46: 406–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yada I, Wada H, Shinoda M, Yasuda K. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2001: Annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 51: 699–716.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohki, Si., Misawa, Y., Saito, T. et al. Clinical features of third open-heart valve surgery at the same valve position. Jpn J Thorac Caridovasc Surg 53, 627–631 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02665072

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02665072

Key words

Navigation