Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Techniques of constructing regional input-output tables: Achievements

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of any analytical method should have to experience at least four stages: its initial status, growth, mature and declining. However, although the regional input-output analysis has been widely applied for more than forty years, it is still one of the most important approach in regional economic analysis and forecast at present in the world. This is due to the never ended modifications and its great potentials. In this paper, we review the historical development of the regional input-output analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CSICS. Input-output tables of China, Beijing & Hawaiil. 1987.

  2. CSO, (1988) Input-output tables for the United Kingdom, 1984, Longdon.

  3. Jensen, R.C. Mandeville, T.D. and Karunaratne, N.D. (1979) Regional economic planning: Generation of regional input-output analysis. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson, H.W. (1985) “Input-output and economic base multipliers: Looking backward and forward”, Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 25, No.4.

  5. Isard, W. (1951) “Interregional and regional input-output analysis: A model of space economy,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 33, 318–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leontief, W.W. (1953) “International theory”, in Leontief, W.W. et al. (eds.), Studies in the structure of the American Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chenery, H.B. (1953) “Regional analysis,” in H.B. Chenery, P.C. Clark, and V. Cao-Pinna (eds.), The structure and growth of the Italian economy. Rome: U.S. Mutual Security Agency, 1053, pp 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuenue, R.E. (1953) Walras, Leontief, and the interdependence of economic activities, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68, pp. 323–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, R.E. (1957) “The impact of the aluminium industry on the Pacific Northwest: A regional input-output analysis,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartwick, J.M. (1971) “Notes on the Isard and Chenery-Moses interregional input-output models,” Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 11, 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moses, L. (1955) “The stability of interregional trading patterns and input-output analysis”, American Economic Research, 45.

  12. Leontief, W.W. and Strout, A.A. (1963) “Multiregional input-output analysis,” in T. Barna (ed.), Structural Independence and economic development. London: Macmillan, pp. 119–149.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Polenske, K.R. (1970) “An empirical test of the interregional input-output models: Estimation of 1963 Japanese production,” American Economic Review, 60, 76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson, A.G. (1968) “Interregional Commodity Flow: Entropy Maximizing Approaches”, Centre for Environmental Studies, WP 19.

  15. Wilson A.G. (1981) Geography and the Environment, London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richardson, H.W. (1972) Input-output and regional economics. New York: Halsted Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’Sullivan, P. (1970) “Forecasting interregional freight flows in Great Britain”, Colston Symposium on Regional Forecasting, Bristol, UK.

  18. Moses, L. (1960) “A general equilibrium model of production, interregional trade, and location of industry”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 42, 373–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bourque, P.J. and Conway, R.S. (1977) The Washington input-output study. Seattle: University of Washington, Graduate School of Business A dministration.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miernyk, W.H. et al (1967) Impact of the Space Program on a Local Economy, West Virginia University Press.

  21. Isard, W. and Langford, T.W. (1971) Regional input-output study: Recollections, Reflections, and Diverse notes on the Philadelphia experience. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Artle, R. (1959) The structure of the Stockholm economy towards a framework for projecting metropolitan community development, New York: Cornell University press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson, A.G. (1974) Urban and regional models in geography and planning, London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nevin, E.t. Roe, A.R. and Round, J.I. (1966) The structure of the Welsh economy. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shaffer, W.A. and Chu, K. (1969) “Nonsurvey techniques for constructing interindustry models,” Papers, Regional Science Association, 23, 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vanwynsberghe, D. (1976) “An operational nonsurvey technique for estimating a coherent set of interregional input-output tables,” in Polenske K.R and Sholka, J.V (eds.), A dvances in input-output analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alward, G.S. and Palmer, C.J. (1981) IMPLAN: An input-output analysis system for forest service planning. Fort Collins: U.S. Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Morrison, W.I. and Smith, P. (1974) “Nonsurvey input output techniques at the small area level: An evaluation,” Journal of Regional Science, 14, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Round, J.I. (1972) “Regional input-output models in the U.K.: A reappraisal of some techniques,” Regional Studies, 6, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Round, J.I. (1978a) “An interregional input-output approach to the evaluation of nonsurvey methods,” Journal of Regional Science, 18, 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hewings, G.J.D. (1980) “The identification of key sectors in an economy: a regional perspective. The Developing Economics, 20, 173–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hewings, G.J.D. (1982) “Regional and interregional interdependence: Alternative accounting systems,” Environment and Planning A, 14, 1469–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Drake, R.E. (1976) “A shortcut to estimates of regional input-output multipliers: methodology and evaluation,” International Regional Science Revies, 1,1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Latham, W.R. and Montgomery, M. (1979) “Methods for calculating regional industry impact multipliers,” Growth and Change, 10, 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cartwright, J.V, Beemiller, R.M. and Gustely, R.D. (1981) Regional input-output modelling systems. Washington, D.C.: U.S.Department of commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Burford R.L. Katz J.L. (1977) “Regional input-output multipliers without full I-O table” Annals of Regional Science, 11, p21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shaffer, W.A. (1976) On the use of input-output models for regional planning. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  38. West, G.R. (1981) “An efficient approach to the estimation of regional input-output multipliers,” Environment and Planning A, 13, 857–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Phibbs, P.J. and Holsman, A.J. (1982) “Estimating input-output multipliers-A new hybrid approach”, Environment and Planning A, 14 335–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jensen, R.C. and McGaurr, A.D. (1976) “Reconciliation of purchases and sales estimates in input-output tables,” Urban Studies, 13, 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jensen, R.C. and McGaurr, A.D. (1977) “Reconciliation techniques in input-output analysis: Some comparisons and implications,” Urban Studies, 14, 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Round, J.I. (1978b) “On estimating trade flows in interregional input-output models,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 8, 284–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Miernyk, W.H. (1976) “Comments on recent developments in regional input-output analysis,” International Regional Science Review, 1, 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Miernyk, W.H. (1979) “Reconciling reconciliation procedures in Regional input-output analysis: Comment,” International Regional Science Review, 4, 36–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gerking, S. (1979) “Reconciling reconciliation procedures in regional input-output analysis,” International Regional Science Review, 21, 451–467.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Polenske, K.E. (1980) The United States Multiregional input-output Accounts and Model. Lexington, Mass: Health.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Miller, R.E. (1966) Interregional feedbacks in input-output models: Some preliminary results,” Western Economic Journal, 17, 106–164.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Williamson, R.B. (1970) “Simple input-output models for area economic analysis,” Land Economics, 46, 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jensen, R.C. and West, G.R. (1980) “The effect of relative coefficient size on input-output multipliers,” Environmental and Planning A, 12, 659–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Miyazawa, K. (1976) “Input-output analysis and the structure of Income distribution.” Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shinnar, A.P. (1976) “A multidimensional accounting model for demographic an economic planning interactions,” Environment and Planning A, 8, p455–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Isard, W. and Anselin, L. (1982) “Integration of multiregional models for policy analysis,” Environment and Planning A, VOL. 14, 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Batey, P.W.J and Madden, M. (1983) “The modelling of demographic-economic change within the context of regional decline: analytical procedures and empirical Resuits”, Socioeconomic Planning Sciences, 17, 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Batey, P.W.J and Madden, M. eds. (1986) Integrated Analysis of Regional System, Pion, London.

  55. Isard, W. (1986) “Reflections on the relevance of integrated multiregional models”. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 16: 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Anselin, L. and Rey, S. (1989) Issues in the specification of an integrated multiregional model for a system of small regions, Paper presented at the 29th European RSA conference, Cambridge, UK.

  57. Batey, P.W.J and Madden, M. (1981) “Demographic-economic forecasting within an activity commodity framework” Environment and planning A, 1981, Vol. 13. pp 1067–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Fromm, D. Loxley, C.J. McCarthy, M. (1980) “The Wharton EFA multiregional econometric model: a bottom up approach top-down approach to constructing a regional model of national economy”, in Modelling the Multiregional Economic Systems. Eds F. G Adams, N J Glickman (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) pp 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sawyer, C.H. and Miller, R.E. (1983) “Experiments in regionalisation of a national input-output table”, Environment and Planning A, 15, 1501–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Jensen, R.C. (1980) The concept of accuracy in regional input-output models, International Regional Science Review, 5, 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hewings, G.J.D. (1984) “The role of prior information in updating regional input-output models”, Socioeconomic Planning Sciences, 18, 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geography, the University of leeds, LS2 9JT, leeds, England

    Jin Yuxian & Christine M. Leigh

Authors
  1. Jin Yuxian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine M. Leigh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jin, Y., Leigh, C.M. Techniques of constructing regional input-output tables: Achievements. Chinese Geographical Science 2, 337–356 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02664565

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02664565

Key words

Search

Navigation