Skip to main content
Log in

Control of superplastic deformation rate during uniaxial tensile tests

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precise determination of superplastic flow behavior involves imposing known and controlled strain rate during deformation of these alloys. Examination of tensile specimens after superplastic deformation has revealed variations in strain and strain rate occurring as a function of position and the difficulty of maintaining a constant strain rate during testing. To quantify these strain and strain-rate gradients within the specimens, interrupted tensile tests and tests on gridded tensile specimens were performed. It was observed that more uniform strain and strain rates could be achieved with longer gauge length specimens. While longer gauge lengths make it possible to have better control over the imposed strain rate by minimizing the effects of material flow from the specimen grip regions, it has been realized that for smaller specimen gauge lengths, typically used in most laboratories, a more complex control of crosshead speed (CHS) during a test is essential to characterize superplastic behavior. A mathematical model has been developed in order to gain better insight into this material flow and to provide an improved crosshead control schedule for constant strain-rate testing. The results of this analysis have been validated on a superplastic aluminum-magnesium alloy (5083 Al).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.K. Ghosh and C.H. Hamilton:Metall. Trans. A, 1979, vol. 10A, pp. 699–706.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Verma, P.A. Friedman, A.K. Ghosh, C. Kim, and S. Kim:Metall. Trans. A, 1996, vol. 27A, pp. 1889–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Liu and Y. Shi-Gong:Mater. Sci. Techno!., 1990, vol. 6, pp. 141–45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K.I. Johnson, M.A. Khaleel, C.A. Lavender, S.G. Pitman, J.T. Smith, M.T. Smith, and C.H. Hamilton: inSuperplasticity in Advanced Materials, Materials Science Forum, T.G. Langdon, ed., Trans Tech Publications, Aedermannsdorf, Switzerland, 1994, vols. 170–172, pp. 627–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.K. Ghosh: inSuperplasticity in Advanced Materials, Materials Science Forum, T.G. Langdon, ed., Trans Tech Publications, Aedermannsdorf, Switzerland, 1994, vols. 170–172, pp. 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.K. Ghosh and C.H. Hamilton:Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 733–43.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.C. Gifkins:Metall. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 7A, pp. 1225–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A.K. Ghosh and A. Basu: inCritical Issues in the Development of High Temperature Structural Materials, Proc. TMS Conf., Kona, HI, 1993, N.S. Stoloff, DJ. Duquette, and A.F. Giamei, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1994, pp. 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.H. Hamilton, H.M. Zbib, C.H. Johnson, and S.K. Richter: inSuperplasticity in Advanced Materials, ICSAM ’91, Osaka, Japan, 1991, S. Hori, M. Tokizane, and N. Furushiro, eds., Japan Society for Research on Superplasticity (JSRS), Tokyo, Japan, pp. 127–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, P.A., Ghosh, A.K. Control of superplastic deformation rate during uniaxial tensile tests. Metall Mater Trans A 27, 3030–3042 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663852

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663852

Keywords

Navigation