Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of hold time and frequency on crack growth in alloy 800H at 650 °C

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The heat resistant material, Alloy 800H, is presently used in pctrochemical processes and for steam superheater tubing in power generation systems. In service, the alloy may experience steady loading, cyclic loading, or a combination of the two. In this paper, crack growth behavior under fatigue, creep, and hold time loading conditions has been characterized as a temperature of 650 ‡C in laboratory air. Fatigue crack growth rate (per second) was observed to increase with increasing frequency. The linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) parameter, δK, was found to be a useful parameter to correlate crack growth rates for fatigue. In creep and hold time cases, where significant plasticity was observed, the energy rate line integral parameter, C*, is a useful descriptive parameter. In fact, C* is capable of consolidating all creep and hold time data into a single straight line on a logarithmic plot. Both creep and hold time tests show the same characteristic deflection curves. This demonstrates that hold time tests are more creep-like than fatigue-like for the test conditions here. Compared to creep loading, fatigue deflection curves show much less induced plasticity, most of which is gathered during the final stages of the experiments at high-stress intensity values. Microstructural examination revealed that a transgranular crack growth mode is predominant during fatigue, while both creep and hold time tests are cavity-controlled crack growth processes with the exception that striations are observed along cavity edges in the hold time tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, ASME, New York, NY, 1983.

  2. ASTM. Standard E647-86,1986 Annual Book of ASTM Stan- dards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1986, vol. 3.01, pp. 714–36.

  3. L.A. James, J.L. Straalsund, and R.E. Bauer:J. Nucl. Mater., 1979, vol. 85-86, pp. 851–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. ASTM Standard E399-81,1986 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1986, vol. 3.01, pp. 522–57.

  5. K.H. Schwalbe:J. Test. Eval., 1981, vol. 9 (3), pp. 218–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H.H. Johnson:Material Research and Standards, 1965, vol. 5, pp. 442–45.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.D. Landes and J.A. Begley: inMechanics of Crack Growth, ASTM STP 590, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1976, pp. 128–48.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. E. Jaske: inThe Mechanism of Fracture, ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1986, pp. 577–85.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.R. Foulds: Presented at the 3rd Int. Symp. on Non-Linear Frac- ture Mechanics, Knoxville, TN, 1986, ASTM STP, in press.

  10. H. Riedel: inFracture at High Temperatures, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1987, pp. 373–75.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. SActananda and P. Shahinian:Metall. Trans. A, 1983, vol. 14A, pp. 1467–80.

    Google Scholar 

  12. V.M. Radhakrishnan and A.J. McEvily:J. Eng. Mater. Tech., 1980, vol. 102, pp. 200–06.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Saxena and J.D. Landes:in Advances in Fracture Research: Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Fracture, 1984, vol. 6, pp. 3977–88.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Taira, R. Dhtani, and T. Komatsu:Trans. ASME, 1979, vol. 101, pp. 154–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Saxena: inFracture Mechanics, ASTM STP 700, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1980, pp. 131–51.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Smith and G.A. Webster: inElastic-Plastic Fracture, ASTM STP 803, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1983, pp. 654–74.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K.M. Nikbin, D.J. Smith, and G.A. Webster:Trans. ASME, 1986, vol. 108, pp. 186–91.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Krompholz, E. Boamann, G. Gnirss, and H. Huthmann:J. Nucl. Technol., 1984, vol. 66, pp. 371–79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J.R. Foulds:Proc. of the Failure Analysis and Related Papers, presented at the Int. Conf. on Fatigue, Corrosion Cracking, Frac- ture Mechanics, and Failure Analysis, ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1986, pp. 269–78.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.A. James:J. Eng. Mater. Tech., 1974, vol. 96, pp. 249–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Shahinian:Met. Technol., 1978, vol. 5, pp. 372–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hour, K.Y., Stubbins, J.F. The effects of hold time and frequency on crack growth in alloy 800H at 650 °C. Metall Trans A 20, 1727–1734 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663204

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663204

Keywords

Navigation