Skip to main content
Log in

The size of martensite plates in 01 tool steel

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The size of martensite plates formed in a commercial 01 tool steel austenitized at 982°C (1800°F) to an ASTM grain size No. 9.4 has been studied and data are compared with those obtained previously on the same steel austenitized at 1204°C (2200°F) to an ASTM grain size No. 2.5. In the fine-grained austenite the first half of the martensitic transformation involves plates of the same diameter and thickness whereas in the coarse-grain austenite transformation involves plates of gradually decreasing diameter but of constant thickness. The reason for this behavior is unclear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. C. Fisher, J. H. Holloman, and D. Turnbull:Trans. AIME, 1949, vol. 185, pp. 691–700.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. H. Shih, C. L. Averbach, and M. Cohen:Trans. AIME, 1955, vol. 203, pp. 183–87.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Kaufman and M. Cohen:Progr. Metal Phys., 1958, vol. 7, pp. 165–246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. V. Raghavan and A. R. Entwisle:Physical Properties ofMartensite and Bainite, Spec. Rept. No. 93, pp. 29–37. Iron and Steel Institute, London, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. R. Entwisle:Metal Sci. J., 1968, vol. 2, pp. 153–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. R. Pati and M. Cohen:ActaMet., 1969, vol. 17, pp. 189–99.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Raghavan and M. Cohen:Met. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 2409–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. L. Magee:Phase Transformation, pp. 115–59, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. G. McMurtrie and C. L. Magee:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 3185–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Y. C. Chen and P. G. Winchell:Met. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 7A, pp. 1177–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. E. Hilliard:Quantitative Microscopy, DeHoff and Rhines, eds., p. 72. McGraw Hill, New York, N. Y., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. E. Underwood:Quantitative Stereology, pp. 5–11. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. L. Fullman:Trans. AIME, 1953, vol. 197, pp. 447–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. E. Hilliard:Metal Progr., 1964, vol. 85, p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. P. Koistinen and R. E. Marburger:ActaMet., 1959, vol. 7, pp. 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. DeHoff:Quantitative Microscopy, DeHoff and Rhines, eds., p. 139, McGraw Hill, N. Y., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. R. Marder and G. Krauss:Trans. ASM 1967, vol. 60, pp. 651–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. G. Davies and C. L. Magee:Met. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, pp. 307–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Formerly stu-dent at Purdue University

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, W.Y.C., Jones, E.N. & Winchell, P.G. The size of martensite plates in 01 tool steel. Metall Trans A 9, 1659–1661 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02661949

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02661949

Keywords

Navigation