Skip to main content
Log in

Intergranular corrosion resistance of microstructure- modified type 316 austenitic stainless steel

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Cold working and a double aging treatment was used to produce a microstructure with fine nuclei of carbides distributed throughout the grains to improve the intergranular corrosion (IGC) resistance of austenitic stainless steel. The treatment was carried out on type 316 stainless steel as follows: cold working (20,30, and 40% reductions in thickness), sensitization (923 KJ5 h), and aging each for 1173,1223,1273, and 1323 K/l h, respectively. Specimens in the solution annealed condition (0% cold work) were also given the above treatment. All of the specimens were resensitized at 923 KJ5 h and tested for IGC resistance as per ASTM A262, Practice A(oxalic acid etch test) and Practice E (24 h immersion in boiling Cu-CuSO.4-H2SO4 and the U- bend test). Microhardness measurements were also carried out on all specimens. The results indicated that at an optimum treatment (30% cold work + sensitization + aging) all the specimens showed improved IGC resistance. The 0 and 20% cold worked specimens showed improvement at higher aging temperatures only. Specimens undergoing 40% cold work exhibited a decrease in IGC resistance. Compared to as-cold-worked specimens, an improvement in IGC resistance was obtained with 30% cold working.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.C. Bain, R.H. Aborn, and J.J.B. Rutherford,Trans. Am. Soc. Steel Treating, Vol 21, 1933, p 481–509.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. V. Cihal,Intergranular Corrosion of Steels and Alloys, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.S. Tedmon, Jr., D.A. Vermilyea, and D.E. Broecker,Corrosion, Vol 27, 1971, p 104–106.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. C.L. Briant and A.M. Ritter,Scr. Metall., Vol 13, 1979, p 177- 181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. R.K. Dayal, N. Parvathavarthini, S. Venkadesan, S.K. Mannan, and J.B. Gnanamoorthy, “Proc. Workshop on Experience in the Fabrication and Use of Stainless Steel Equipment in the Depart- ment of Atomic Energy Projects,” Paper No. C.66, Kalpakkam, India, 1981.

  6. S.K. Mannan, R.K. Dayal, M. Vijayalakshmi, and N. Parvathavarthini,J. Nucl. Mat., Vol 126, 1984, p 1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. C.L. Briant and A.M. Ritter,Metall. Trans., Vol 11A, 1980, p 2009–2017.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Pednekar and S. Smialowska,Corrosion, Vol 36, 1980, p 565- 577.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Parvathavarthini, R.K. Dayal, S.K. Seshadri, and J.B. Gnanamoorthy,J. Nucl. Mater., Vol 168, 1989, p 83–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. W.L. Clarke and G.M. Gordon,Corrosion, Vol 29,1973, p 1.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. L.E. Murr, A. Advani, S. Shankar, and D.G. Atteridge,Mater. Characterization, Vol 24, 1990, p 135–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Pascali, A. Benvenuti, and D. Wenger,Corrosion, Vol 40, 1984, p 21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S.M. Bruemmer,Mater. Sci. Forum, Vol 1989,1989, p 309–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S.M. Bruemmer, L.A. Chariot, and D.G. Atteridge, “Composition Effects on the Sensitization of Austenitic Stainless Steels,” Report NUREGJCR-3918, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1984; Pacific Northwest Laboratory, 1984.

  15. R.A. Mulford, E.L. Hall, and C.L. Briant,Corrosion, Vol 39, 1983, p132–143.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. A.J. Sedriks,Corrosion of Stainless Steels, John Wiley & Sons, 1979.

  17. A.H. Advani, D.G. Atteridge, and L.E. Murr,Scr. Metall. Mater., Vol 25, 1991, p 2221–2226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Weiss and R. Stickler,Metall.Trans., Vol 3A, 1972, p851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. U. Kamachi Mudali, S. Venkadesan, and J.B. Gnanamoorthy,J. Mater. Eng., Vol 12, 1990, p 227–234.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. “Standard Practices for Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Attack in Austenitic Stainless Steels,” A262-81, in1981 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 3.1, ASTM, 1984, p 66.

  21. D.C. Cook,Metall. Trans. A, Vol 18, 1987, p 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S.W. Yang and J.E. Spruiell,J. Mater. Sci., Vol 17, 1982, p 677- 690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. O. Terao and B. Sasmal,Metallography,Vol 13, 1980, p 117–133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. K.G. Samuel, P. Rodriguez, and K.A. Padmanabhan,Trans. Ind. Inst. Met., Vol 39, 1986, p 421–425.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamachi Mudali, U., Vinod, N., Sundar, M. et al. Intergranular corrosion resistance of microstructure- modified type 316 austenitic stainless steel. JMEP 1, 831–838 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02658267

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02658267

Keywords

Navigation