Skip to main content
Log in

Fluid flow and mass transfer in an inductively stirred four-ton melt of molten steel: A comparison of measurements and predictions

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experimental measurements are reported on melt velocities and on the rate at which immersed carbon rods dissolve in a 4-ton induction furnace, holding a low carbon steel melt. These measurements are compared with theoretical predictions, based on the numerical solution of Maxwell’s equations and the turbulent Navier-Stokes equations. In general, good agreement has been obtained, both regarding the absolute values of the velocities and the mass transfer coefficients and the trends predicted by the theoretical analysis. In addition to providing further proof regarding the applicability of the mathematical modeling technique, the principal contribution of the work is that it provides an improved insight into the behavior of inductively stirred melts. In particular it was found that for an inductively stirred melt both the velocities and the rate of turbulence energy dissipation are relatively uniform spatially, in contrast to bubble stirred systems, where most of the agitation is confined to the jet plume and to the near surface region. It was found, furthermore, that the mass transfer coefficient characterizing the rate of dissolution of immersed carbon rods depends both on the absolute values of the melt velocity and on the local values of the turbulence intensity; thus significant mass transfer will occur in the region of the eye of the circulation, where the absolute value of the mean velocity is small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

vector potential (Wb/m)

B :

magnetic flux density (Wb/m2)

d :

diameter of graphite rod (m)

D :

carbon diffusivity in iron (m2/s)

Fs :

electromagnetic stirring force (N/m3)

h :

mass transfer coefficient (m/s)

I :

coil current (A)

J :

induced eddy current (A/m2)

k :

turbulent kinetic energy (m2 s2)

p :

pressure (N/m2)

r :

radial coordinate (m)

S :

cross-sectional area of elementary circuit (m2)

Uz,Ur :

axial and radial velocity, respectively (m/s)

Uc, max :

maxmaximum velocity at the centerline

U loc :

local velocity in the melt (m/s)

z :

axial coordinate (m)

μo :

magnetic permeability (H/m)

μl :

laminar viscosity (kg/m · s)

μeff :

effective viscosity (kg/m · s)

ρ:

density of the melt (kg/m3)

ε:

turbulent energy dissipation (m2 s3)

σ:

electric conductivity (Ohm · m)-1

ω :

frequency

NRe :

Reynolds number-ρU locd/ωl

Tu:

turbulence intensity-(U′2)1/2/Uc,max

N Sh :

Sherwood numberhd/D

N Sc :

Schmidt number ω/ρD

References

  1. SCANINJECT I. Proc. Int. Conf. on “Injection Metallurgy”, MEFOS, Luleå, Sweden, June 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. SCANINJECT II. Proc.Int.Conf. on “Injection Metallurgy,” MEFOS, Luleå, Sweden, June 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Secondary Steelmaking, Proc. Int. Conf., London, The Metal Soc., 1978.

  4. J. Szekely. N. El-Kaddah, and J. H. Grevet: SCANINJECT II, Luleâ, Sweden, 1980, p. 5:1.

  5. J.M. Grevet, J. Szekely, and N. El-Kaddah:Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer, 1982, vol. 25, p. 487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. El-Kaddah and J. Szekely:Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1981, vol. 8. p. 269.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Nakanishi, J. Szekely, and C.W. Chang:Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1975, vol. 3, p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Szekely and K. Nakanishi:Metall. Trans. B, 1975, vol. 6B, p. 245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. E. D. Tarapore and J.W. Evans:Metall. Trans. B, 1976, vol. 7B, p. 343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. E. D. Tarapore, J. W. Evans, and J. Langfeldt:Metall. Trans. B, 1977, vol. 8B, p. 179.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Szekely and C.W. Chang:Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1977, vol. 4, p. 196.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Szekely and C.W. Chang:Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1977, vol. 4. p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. El-Kaddah and J. Szekely:J. Fluid Mechanics, 1983, vol. 133, p. 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N. El-Kaddah and J. Szekely:Metall. Trans. B, 1983, vol. 14B, p. 401.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. W. K.H. Panofsky and M.Phillips:Classical Electricity and Magnetism, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, 1962.

  16. E. Koble and W. Reiss:Wiss. Z. Hochsch, Elektrotech, Ilmenan, 1963. vol. 9. p. 311.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.B. Spalding: Report HTS 76/2, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, 1976.

  18. T. C. Hsiao: MEFOS report, No. 79063E.

  19. V.T. Morgan:Advances in Heat Transfer, Actademic Press, 1975, vol. 11, p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. El-Kaddah and J. Szekely: Proc. Sem. on “Injection in Extraction and Refining,” Univ. of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, U.K., 1982, vol. 2, p. r:1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. El-Kaddah, J. Grevet, and J. Szekely: “Melting Rates in Turbulent Recirculating Flow Systems,”Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer, 1984, vol. 27, p. 1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

On leave at Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Kaddah, N., Szekely, J. & Carlsson, G. Fluid flow and mass transfer in an inductively stirred four-ton melt of molten steel: A comparison of measurements and predictions. Metall Trans B 15, 633–640 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02657283

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02657283

Keywords

Navigation