Skip to main content
Log in

Upgrading copper concentrate by hydrothermally converting chalcopyrite to digenite

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chalcopyrite in copper flotation concentrates can be hydrothermally converted to digenite directly with oxygen in a continuous process, provided the oxygen supply rate is stoichiomet-rically matched to the chalcopyrite feed rate. Substantial elimination of iron and sulfur can result and may be used to significantly increase smelter copper throughput. A simple process flowsheet is described with only three steps: regrind, hydrothermal conversion, and solid/liquid separa-tion. Fine particle size and autoclave temperatures above 200 °C provide a high conversion yield in residence times less than 1 hour using a single-stage mixing autoclave with good gas dis-persion. Extrapolated kinetic data from monosize particle batch conversion experiments were coupled with particle size distributions and ideal back-mix reactor residence time distributions to compute process yields for a continuous reactor. Optimum processing conditions are deduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.H. Emmons:The Enrichment of Sulfide Ores, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 529, 1913, p. 260.

  2. A.M. Bateman:Economic Mineral Deposits, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1955, pp. 274–89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.J. McGauley and E.S. Roberts: U.S. Patent No. 2,568,963, Sept. 25, 1951.

  4. E.S. Roberts, F.A. Schaufelberger, and P.J. McGauley: U.S. Patent No. 2,662,009, Dec. 8, 1953.

  5. P.J. McGauley, F.A. Schaufelberger, and E.S. Roberts: U.S. Patent No. 2,755,172, July 17, 1956.

  6. W.A. Yuill, D.B. Willson, R.D. Armstrong, and B.A. Krebs: Presented at Annual AIME Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, Feb. 26, 1984; also see Canadian Patent No. 1,258,181.

  7. H.J. Sohn and M.E. Wadsworth: Presented at Annual AIME Meeting, Session on Hydrometallurgy, Los Angeles, CA, Feb. 26, 1984.

  8. H.J. Sohn and M.E. Wadsworth:J. Met., 1980, vol. 32 (11), pp. 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.R. McKay and E.G. Parker: U.S. Patent No. 4,024,218 and Canadian Patent No. 1,016,755.

  10. R.W. Bartlett, D.B. Wilson, B.J. Savage, and R.J. Wesely: inHydrometallurgical Reactor Design and Kinetics, R.G. Bautista, ed., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1986, pp. 227–46.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Hackl and E. Peters: Presented at meeting of Canadian Institute of Mining, Toronto, ON, Canada, Aug., 1982.

  12. H.J. Sohn: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.D. Peterson: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Schuhmann:Trans. SME-AIME, 1960, vol. 217, pp. 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robert W. Bartlett:Metall. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 2999–3006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R.W. Bartlett:Metall. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, pp. 913–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P.G. Mason:J. Met., 1990, vol. 42 (9), pp. 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G.D. Ulrich:A Guide to Chemical Engineering Process Design and Economics, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1984, p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartlett, R.W. Upgrading copper concentrate by hydrothermally converting chalcopyrite to digenite. Metall Trans B 23, 241–248 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656279

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656279

Keywords

Navigation