Abstract
The effect of various silicon levels on the reaction between iron panels and Al-Zn-Si liquid baths during hot dipping at 610°C was studied. Five different baths were used: 55Al−0.7Si−Zn, 55Al−1.7Si−Zn, 55Al−3.0Si−Zn, 55Al−5.0Si−Zn, and 55Al−6.88Si−Zn (in wt pct). The phases which formed as a result of this reaction were identified as Fe2Al5 and FeAl3 (binary Fe−Al phases with less than 2 wt pct Si and Zn in solution),T1, T2, T4, T8, andT 5H (ternary Fe−Al−Si phases), andT 5C (a quaternary Fe−Al−Si−Zn phase). Compositional variations through the reaction zone were determined. The phase sequence in the reaction zone of the panel dipped for 3600 seconds in the 1.7 wt pct Si bath was iron panel/(Fe2Al5+T 1)/FeAl3/(T 5H+T 5C)/overlay. In the panel dipped for 1800 seconds in the 3.0 wt pct Si bath the reaction zone consisted of iron panel/Fe2Al5/(Fe2Al5+T 1)/T 1/FeAl3/(FeAl3+T 2)/T 5H/overlay. In the panel dipped for 3600 seconds in the 6.88 wt pct Si bath the phase sequence was iron panel/Fe2Al5/(Fe2Al5+T1)/(T1+FeAl3)/(T1+T2)/T2/T8/T4/overlay. The growth kinetics of the reaction zone were also studied. A minimum growth rate for the reaction zone which formed from a reaction between the iron panel and molten Al−Zn−Si bath was found in the 3.0 wt pct Si bath. The growth kinetics of the reaction layers were found to be diffusion controlled in the 0.7, 1.7, and 6.88 wt pct Si baths, and interface controlled in the 3.0 and 5.0 wt pct Si baths. The presence of the interface between theT2/T5H, Fe2Al5/T 1, orT 1/FeAl3 phases is believed responsible for the interface controlled growth kinetics exhibited in the 3.0 and 5.0 wt pct Si baths.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. C. Zoccola, H. E. Townsend, A. R. Borzillo, and J. B. Horton: Special Technical Publication 646, ASTM, Phila, PA, 1978.
J. H. Selverian, A. R. Marder, and M. R. Notis:Metall. Trans. A, 1988, vol. 19A, pp. 1193–1203.
J. H. Selverian, A. R. Marder, and M. R. Notis:J. Electron Micro. Tech., 1987, vol. 5 (3), pp. 223–26.
H. J. Cleary,Microstructural Science, D. O. Northwood, W. E. White, and G. F. Van der Voort, eds., ASM, Metals Park,, OH, 1985, vol. 12, pp. 103–23.
J. H. Selverian, A. R. Marder, and M. R. Notis:J. of Material Engineering, 1987, vol. 9 (2), pp. 133–40.
V. G. Rivlin and G. V. Raynor,Inter. Met. Rev., 1981, vol. 26 (3), pp. 133–52.
W. Köster and T. Godecke:Z. Metallkde., 1970, vol. 61, pp. 649.
P. R. Sperry and M. H. Bankard:Metals Handbook, 8th ed., ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1973, vol. 8, p. 124.
J. L. Devore: inProbability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Brooks/Cole Publ. Co., Monterey, CA, 1982, p. 319.
S. Takeda and K. Mutuzaki:Tetsu-to-Hagané, 1940, vol. 26, pp. 335–61.
J. B. Clark and F. N. Rhines:Trans. ASM, 1959, vol. 51, pp. 199–221.
J. Iglessis, C. Frantz, and M. Gantois:Mém. Sci. Rev. Métall., 1977, vol. 73 (4), pp. 237–42.
J. I. Goldstein, D. E. Newbury, P. Echlin, D. C. Joy, C. Fliori, and E. Lifshin: inScanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis, Plenum Press: New York, NY, 1981, pp. 75–75, 158–59, 173–75.
D. Munson:J. Inst. Met., 1967, vol. 95, pp. 217–19.
V. T. Heumann and S. Dittrich:Z. Metallkde., 1959, vol. 50 (10), pp. 617–25.
Card #29–43, Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS), Swarthmore, PA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Selverian, J.H., Marder, A.R. & Notis, M.R. The effects of silicon on the reaction between solid iron and liquid 55 wt pct Al−Zn baths. Metall Trans A 20, 543–555 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653934
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653934