Abstract
X-ray topography provides a very sensitive map of lattice mismatch between a HgCdTe LPE epitaxial layer and its (111) CdZnTe substrate. A well-defined Crosshatch pattern in the three «110» directions indicates a positive room-temperature lattice mismatch. For conditions of near-perfect lattice matching (±0.003% mismatch), the Crosshatch pattern disappears, presumably because there are few or no misfit dislocations present near the interface, and a region free of topographic contrast is observed. The crosshatch-free region occurs for a small positive room-temperature mismatch (about 0.02%); this is attributed to differences in the lattice matching condition at room temperature and the growth temperature. For negative mismatches, where the film is in tension, a mosaic pattern, rather than a crystallographically oriented Crosshatch, is observed in the topograph. Rocking curve full width at half maximum of the epitaxial layer is minimized in the crosshatch-free zone at a value nearly equal to that of the substrate. Etch pit density of the HgCdTe layer shows a strong minimum for perfect room temperature lattice matching, with values as low as 1 x 104 cm−2. For nearly lattice matched layers, Crosshatch is present throughout the thickness of the epitaxial layer except for a narrow graded-composition region near the substrate interface. Crosshatch contrast appears to result from long-range strain fields associated with a misfit dislocation network near the substrate interface. Spatial variations in topographic features and mismatch across relatively small lateral distances are caused by variations in substrate alloy composition. For truly lattice-matched substrates, better control over the substrate lattice parameter is required.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Dudley,Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 307, 213 (1993).
I. Hähnert and M. Schenk,J. Cryst. Growth 101, 251 (1990).
K. Nakagawa, K. Maeda and S. Takeuchi,Appl. Phys. Lett. 34,574(1979).
S.L. Bell and S. Sen,J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3, 112 (1985).
B. Pellicari, G.L. Destefanis and L. Di Cioccio,J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7, 314 (1989).
S. Bernardi, C. Bocchi, C. Ferrari, P. Franzosi and L. Lazzarini,J. Cryst. Growth 113, 53 (1991).
I. Utke, L. Parthier and M. Schenk,J. Cryst. Growth 123,269 (1992).
J.H. Basson and H. Booyens,Phys. Stat. Solidi. (A) 80, 663 (1983).
M.G. Williams, R.D. Tomlinson and M.J. Hampshire,Solid State Comm. 7, 1831 (1969).
H.J. Holland and K. Beck,J. Appl. Phys. 39, 3498 (1968).
A. Nouruzi-Khorasani, I.P. Jones, P.S. Dobson, D.J. Williams and M.G. Astles,J. Cryst. Growth 96, 348 (1989).
D. Chandra, J.H. Tregilgas and M.W. Goodwin,J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 1852 (1991).
M. Yoshikawa,J. Appl. Phys. 63, 1533 (1988).
G. Cohen-Solal, F. Bailly and M. Barbé,J. Cryst. Growth 138, 68 (1994).
J.C. Brice,Properties of Mercury Cadmium Telluride, EMIS Datareviews Series No. 3 (London: INSPEC, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1987), p. 4.
R.A. Carlson, R. J. Hager and R.A. Wood,J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 5, 3048 (1987).
S.M. Johnson, D.R. Rhiger, J.P. Rosbeck, J.M. Peterson, S.M. Taylor and M.E. Boyd,J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10,1499 (1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tobin, S.P., Smith, F.T.J., Norton, P.W. et al. The relationship between lattice matching and crosshatch in liquid phase epitaxy HgCdTe on CdZnTe substrates. J. Electron. Mater. 24, 1189–1199 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653073
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653073