Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B

, Volume 3, Issue 11, pp 2959–2964 | Cite as

Microstructure and microsegregation effects in the intergranular corrosion of austenitic stainless steel

  • N. C. Barbi
  • G. Judd
Environmental Interactions


Intergranular corrosion in austenitic stainless steel was studied using transmission electron microscopy of corroded thin foils and electron probe microanalysis of bulk specimens. In the sensitized material, since carbides remained unattacked in corroded grain boundaries after exposure to a boiling copper sulfate-sulfuric acid solution, the location and severity of corrosion could be directly observed in relation to individual carbide particles for various precipitate morphologies. After the sensitized material was exposed to a potassium dichromate nitric acid solution, carbides were consistently absent from corroded grain boundaries as the particles themselves apparently became susceptible to attack in this environment. Chemical composition inhomogeneities were measured for nickel and chromium in the commercially annealed material and found to become more pronounced upon sensitization heat treatments. Such inhomogeneities can result in chemical composition differences across grain boundaries, which in turn can lead to electrochemical action that may adversely affect intergranular corrosion behavior.


Carbide Austenitic Stainless Steel Thin Foil Carbide Particle Metallurgical Transaction Volume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Aborn and E. Bain:Trans. Amer. Soc. Steel Treat, 1930, vol. 18, pp. 837–93.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Tedmon, D. Vermilyea, and J. Rosolowski:J. Electrochem. Soc, 1971, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Kinzel:AIME Trans., 1952, vol. 194, pp. 469–88.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Stickler and A. Vinckier:Trans. ASM, 1961, vol. 54, pp. 362–80.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Thomas:Transmission Electron Microscopy of Metals, 1st ed., pp. 150–64, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Stickler and A. Vinckier:Corrs. Sci., 1963, vol. 3, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Armijo:Corrosion, 1968, vol. 24, pp. 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Colby: Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., Allentown, Pennsylvania, private communication, 1969.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Younger, R. Baker, and R. Littlewood:Corrs. Sci., 1962, vol. 2, pp. 157–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Vermilyea and C. Tedmon:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1,pp. 1076–77.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Philbrook and M. Bever:Basic Open Hearth Steel Making, pp. 434–58, AIME, New York, 1951.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Aust, J. Armijo, and J. Westbrook:Trans. ASM, 1966, vol. 59, pp. 544–56.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Amijo:Corrosion, 1965, vol. 21, pp. 235–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Metallurgical of Society of AIME 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. C. Barbi
    • 1
  • G. Judd
    • 2
  1. 1.Materials Research and Process Engineering SectionGeneral Dynamics Corp., Electro Dynamic DivisionPomona
  2. 2.Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteMaterials DivisionUSA

Personalised recommendations