Skip to main content
Log in

Consequentialism or deontology?

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Basterra, F. J. E. (1991).Bioethics. Middlegreen. St Pauls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, J. (1995).The act itself. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1960).A fragment on government with an introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (ed. by W. Harrison), Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (First published: 1789)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S. (1998).Ruling passions. A theory of practical reasoning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R. B. (1996).Facts, values, and morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, C. D. (1949). Some of the main problems of ethics. In H. Feigl & W. Sellars (Eds.),Readings in philosophical analysis (pp. 547–563). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, C. D. (1952).Ethics and the history of philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, C. D. (1967).Five types of ethical theory (6th ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A. & Kohlberg, L. (1987).The measurement of moral judgement (Vol. 1): Theoretical foundations and research valuation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donagan, A. (1977).The theory of morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. (1988).Explaining behavior: Reasons in a world of causes. Cambridge/Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, W. K. (1973).Ethics (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, C. (1978).Right and wrong. Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M. (1973).Freiheit und Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M. (1993). A utilitarian approach. In Kuhse, H. & Singer, P. (Eds.),A Companion to Bioethics (pp.80–85). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1977). Rule utilitarianism and decision theory.Erkenntnis, 11, 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Käuflein, A. (1995).Deontologische oder teleologische Begründungen sittlicher Normen? St. Ottilien: EOS-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, D. & Rawling, P. (1998). On defending deontology.Ratio, 11, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1863).Utilitarianism. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1975).Grundprobleme der Ethik. München: Beck. (Originally published 1912: Ethics)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell-Smith, P. H. (1957).Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971).A theory of justice. Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. D. (1930).The right and the good. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. D. (1939).Foundations of ethics. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runggaldier, E. (1996).Was sind Handlungen? Eine philosophische Auseinandersetzung mit dem Naturalismus. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzman, T. A. (1995).Deontology and teleology: An investigation of the normative debate in the Roman Catholic moral theology. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, S. (1995).The rejection of consequentialism (rev. ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüller, B. (1973).Die Begründung sittlicher Urteile: Typen ethische Argumentation in der Moraltheologie. Düsseldorf: Patmos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H. (1981).The methods of ethics (7th ed.) Indianapolis/Camb.: Hackett. (Originally published 1907)

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M. (2001).Morals from motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tugendhat, E. (1993).Vorlesungen über Ethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. H. v. (1963).The varieties of goodness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. H. v. (1983).Practical reason. Philosophical papers (Vol. 1): Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spielthenner, G. Consequentialism or deontology?. Philosophia 33, 217–235 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652653

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652653

Keywords

Navigation