Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Defending Berkeley's divine ideas

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acton, H.B. 1967. “George Berkeley.” In P. Edwards, ed.Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfrage, Bertil. 1987.George Berkeley's Manuscript Introduction. Oxford: Doxa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, George. 1975.Philosophical Works, Including the Works on Vision. M. Ayers, ed. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, George. 1948-57.The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. A.A. Luce and T.E. Jessop, eds. 9 vols. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brykman, Geneviève. 1987. “Berkeley on ‘Archetype.’” In E. Sosa, ed.Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. Boston: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, Denis. 1952. “The Solipsism of Bishop Berkeley.”Philosophical Quarterly 2: 338–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolley, Nicholas. 1996. “Berkeley, Malebranche, and Vision in God.”Journal of the History of Philosophy 34: 535–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. 1975.An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Peter Nidditch, ed. New York: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabbott, J.D. 1968. “The Place of God in Berkeley's Philosophy.” In D. Armstrong and C.B. Martin, eds.Locke and Berkeley: A Collection of Critical Essays. South Bend: Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malebranche, Nicolas. 1997a.Dialogues on Metaphysics and Religion. David Scott, trans., Nicholas Jolley, ed. New York: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malebranche, Nicholas. 1997b.The Search After Truth and Elucidations of the Search After Truth. Thomas Lennon and Paul Olscamp, trans. New York: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKim, Robert. 1982. “Wenz on Abstract Ideas and Christian Neo-Platonism in Berkeley.”Journal of the History of Ideas 43: 665–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynor, David. 1987. “Berkeley's Ontology.”Dialogue 26: 611–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, G.J. 1970.Berkeley's Analysis of Perception. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubenberg, Leopold. 1990. “Divine Ideas: The Cure-All for Berkeley's Immaterialism?”Southern Journal of Philosophy 28: 221–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tipton, I.C. 1988.The Philosophy of Immaterialism. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, G.J. 1982.Berkeley. South Bend: Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenz, Peter. 1976. “Berkeley's Christian Neo-Platonism.”Journal of the History of Ideas 37: 537–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, Kenneth. 1989.Berkeley: An Interpretation. New York: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yandell, David. 1995. “Berkeley on Common Sense and the Privacy of Ideas.”History of Philosophy Quarterly 12: 411–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hampden-Sydney College, 23943, Hampden-Sydney, Virginia, USA

    Marc A. Hight

Authors
  1. Marc A. Hight
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hight, M.A. Defending Berkeley's divine ideas. Philosophia 33, 97–128 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652649

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652649

Keywords

Search

Navigation