Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of work-hardening and rate sensitivity on the sheet tensile test

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of strain hardening and strain-rate hardening in sheet tensile tests has been investigated using finite-element modeling (FEM). A Hollomon-type material law was examined with n-values (logarithmic work hardening rate) between 0.0 and 0.5 andm- values (logarithmic strainrate sensitivity) between -0.002 and 0.3. A von Mises yield condition with isotropic hardening rule completed the material model. The results of these simulations showed that, as expected, the uniform elongation(e u ) depends mainly onn, with a small dependence onm. The post-uniform elongation (e f e u ;e f = total elongation) depends on bothn andm, and is highly nonlinear in either variable for large parametric values. That is, combined increases ofn andm extend ductility more than the additive increase expected from separate effects. Earlier presumptions thatn is unimportant in the post-uniform region appear incorrect. Approximate relations between (e f ,e u ) and (n,m) were developed quantitatively. These relations have been compared with superplastic data in the literature and appear to agree well, given uncertainties in specimen geometry and test procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Considére:Ann. des Ponts et Chaussees, 1885, vol. 9, ser. 6, p. 574.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.W. Hart:Acta Metall., 1967, vol. 15, pp. 351–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Duncombe:Inter. J. Mech. Sci., 1972, vol. 14, pp. 325–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. K. Ghosh:Metall. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 1221–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J.W. Hutchinson and K.W. Neale:Acta Metall., 1977, vol. 7A, pp. 839–46.

    Google Scholar 

  6. U.F. Kocks, J.J. Jonas, and H. Mecking:Acta Metall., 1979, vol. 27, pp. 419–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. F. A. Nicois:Acta Metall., 1980, vol. 28, pp. 663–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. I.H. Lin, J. P. Hirth, and E. W. Hart:Acta Metall., 1981, vol. 29, pp. 819–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Lee and W. A. Backofen:Trans. AIME, 1967, vol. 239, p. 1034.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. A. Woodford:Trans. Am. Soc. Metals, 1969, vol. 62, pp. 291–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Rai and N.J. Grant:Metall. Trans. A, 1975, vol. 6A, pp. 385–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A.K. Ghosh:J. Eng. Mat. Tech. Trans. ASME, 1977, vol. 99, pp. 264–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J.H. Hollomon:Trans. AIME, 1945, vol. 162, pp. 268–90.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Hill:Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 1979, vol. 85, pp. 179–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P. B. Mellor and A. Parmer:Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming, D.P. Koistinen and N.-M. Wang, eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1978, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Chung and R.H. Wagoner:Metall. Trans. A, 1986, vol. 17A, pp. 1632–33.

    Google Scholar 

  17. N.-M. Wang:Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, J.F.T. Pittman, R.D. Wood, J.M. Alexander, and O.C. Zienkiewicz, eds., Pineridge Press, Swansea, U.K., 1982, p. 797.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tensilkut Engineering, Danbury, CT 06810.

  19. S.L. Semiatin and J.J. Jonas:Formability and Workability of Metals, ASM, Metals Park, OH.

  20. P. W. Bridgeman:Trans. ASM, 1944, vol. 32, pp. 553–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

K. CHUNG, formerly Postdoctoral Research Associate, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, The Ohio State University

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, K., Wagoner, R.H. Effects of work-hardening and rate sensitivity on the sheet tensile test. Metall Trans A 19, 293–300 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652538

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652538

Keywords

Navigation