Skip to main content
Log in

Surface contamination and damage from CF4 and SF6 reactive ion etching of silicon oxide on gallium arsenide

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two reactive ion etchants, CF4 and SF6, have been compared in terms of plasma characteristics, silicon oxide etch characteristics, extent of RIE damage, and formation of barrier layers on a GaAs surface after oxide etch. It was found that higher etch rates with lower plasma-induced dc bias can be achieved with SF6 plasma relative to CF4 plasma and that this correlates with higher atomic fluorine concentration in SF6 plasma. RIE damage, measured by loss of sheet conductance in a thin highly-doped GaAs layer, could be modelled as a region of deep acceptors at a high concentration in the conductive layer. By relating the sheet conductance change to the modelled damaged layer thickness, it was found that the RIE-damaged thickness from both CF4 and SF6 plasmas had the same linear relation to plasma dc bias. Barriers to subsequent GaAs RIE were created during oxide overetch at the GaAs surface. The barriers were identified by XPS as ∼20 A of GaF3 for CF4 plasma and ∼30 A of GaF3 on top of AsxSy for SF6 plasma. Ellipsometry was used to routinely determine the presence or absence of the barriers which could be removed in dilute ammonia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sang-Mo Shin, Ho-Kyoon Chung, Chung-Hsu Chen and Kin Tan, J. Appl. Phys. 62, 1729 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tohru Hara, Hidenori Suzuki and Akio Suga, J. Appl. Phys.62, 4109 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. L. Seaward, N. J. Moll, D. J. Coulman and W. F. Stickle,J. Appl. Phys. 61, 2358 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. W. Coburn and M. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 51, 3134 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ch. Steinbrüche, H. W. Lehmann and K. Frick, J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 180 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. M. Sze,Physics of Semiconductor Devices, (Wiley, New York, 1981) page 77.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. W. Pang, G. A. Lincoln, R. W. McClelland, P. D. DeGraff,M. W. Geis and W. J. Piacentini, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1,1334 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. James Comas and C. Burleigh Cooper, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 2820(1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Note that GaF3 was not observed by XPS after CCl2F2:He reactive ion etch of GaAs, as described in Ref. 3.

  10. K. L. Seaward, N. J. Moll and W. F. Stickle, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 6, 1645 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, ed Robert C. Weast(CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1985), p. B-74 and B-97.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. J. Fonash, Solid State Technol., April 1985, p. 201.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seaward, K.L., Moll, N.J. & Stickle, W.F. Surface contamination and damage from CF4 and SF6 reactive ion etching of silicon oxide on gallium arsenide. J. Electron. Mater. 19, 385–391 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651301

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651301

Key words

Navigation