Skip to main content
Log in

The role of humor in the interpretation of sexist incidents

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the role of humor, gender, and sexist attitudes toward women in the interpretation of sexist incidents. Thirty female and thirty male university students rated the humorousness of and the reactions to recent sexist incidents on Canadian university campuses. As predicted, perceiving sexist incidents as humorous was associated with the tendency to see them as less sexist, to understand the actions and attitudes displayed as more acceptable, and to believe one would have shown approval of the latter. Path analysis indicated that gender did not affect the interpretations of and reactions to these incidents, and that the influence of sexist attitudes toward women was mainly indirect—that is, via their impact on the perception of humorousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, K. L., & Ware, N. C. (1984). Sexism and the English language: The linguistic implications of being a woman. In J. Freeman (Ed.),Women: A feminist perspective. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. (1975). Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P., & Vincent, S. (1980). Development and validation of the sexist attitudes towards women scale (SATWS).Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 276–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, C. (1968). On being born female.Vital Speeches of the Day, 35, 88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. (1986).The economics of women, men and work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleier, R. (1984).Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodzinsky, D. M., Barnet, K., & Aiello, J. R. (1981). Sex of subject and gender identity as factors in humor appreciation.Sex Roles, 7, 561–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrke, R. A. (1988). Factor dimensions across different measures of sex role ideology.Sex Roles, 18, 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor J. R. (1976). What is funny to whom? The role of gender.Journal of Communication, 26, 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. J. (1976). Is sexual humor sexist.Journal of Communication, 26, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, D. (1985). Perpetuation of gender inequality: a content analysis of comic strips.Sex Roles, 13, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, R. L. (1960). Laughter among colleagues. A study of the social functions of humor among the staff of a mental hospital.Psychiatry, 23, 81–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D., & Marlow, D. (1964).The approval motive: studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (1973).Beyond God the father: Towards a philosophy of women’s liberation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Crow, K. (1975).Sexist justice. New York: Vintage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, N., & Sadker, M. (1973).Sexism in school and society. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, S., & Smithson, I. (1990).Gender in the classroom: power and pedagogy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, B., & Cvetkovich, G. (1972). Humor appreciation and issue involvement.Psychonomic Science, 27, 199–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassett, J., & Houlihan, J. (1979). Different jokes for different folks.Psychology Today, 12, 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, B., & Fish, J. M. (1986). Gender and personality differences in the appreciation of cartoon humor.The Journal of Psychology, 120, 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I., (1982).Gender. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komisar, L. (1971). The image of women in advertising. In V. Garnick & R. K. Moran (Eds.),Women in sexist society. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, E. (1983). Forms of false consciousness among professional women. In P. Lattin, J. Bischoff, & L. Tafel (Eds.),Feminist research in the eighties. Dekalb: Northern Illinois University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Calla-Vickers, J. (1984).Taking sex into account. The policy consequences of sexist research. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T. E., Griffiths, K., & Payne, B. (1987). Gender, attitudes towards women, and the appreciation of sexist humor.Sex Roles, 16, 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1982).Multiple regression in behavioral research. Explanation and prediction. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B. (1974).Sexism in higher education. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruether, R. (1983).Sexism and God-talk: toward a feminist theology. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). The attitudes towards women scale: an objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society.JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternglanz, S. H., & Serbin, L. A. (1976). Sex roles stereotyping in children’s television programs. In R. G. Kaplan & J. P. Bean (Eds.),Beyond sex-role stereotypes: reading toward a psychology of androgyny. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetterling-Braggin, M. (Ed.). (1981).Sexist language: a modern philosophical analysis. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1976). A disposition theory of humor and mirth. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),Humor and laughter: theory, research and applications. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bill, B., Naus, P. The role of humor in the interpretation of sexist incidents. Sex Roles 27, 645–664 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651095

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651095

Keywords

Navigation