Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of substrate surface roughness on the fracture toughness of Cu/96.5Sn-3.5Ag solder joints

  • Regular Issue Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of substrate surface roughness, joint thickness, time above liquidus, and testing temperature on the chevron notch fracture toughness of Cu/96.5Sn-3.5Ag solder joints are investigated. Of these four variables,only the surface roughness of the copper surfaces to be soldered has a significant effect. A minimum fracture toughness is obtained when the average surface roughness, Ra, is between 0.2 and 1.0 μm. This encompasses the surface roughnesses produced by many cold forming operations. Decreasing the roughness to 0.04 μm increases the fracture toughness from 4.7 to 11.0 MPa√m, an improvement of 135%. Increasing the roughness to 2.0 μm increases the fracture toughness to 8.8 MPa√m, an improvement of 80%. We attribute these effects to the increased growth stresses that develop in the brittle intermetallic layer when the size scale of individual intermetallic particles is comparable to the size of the roughness features of the substrate. Two models that describe how these growth stresses might develop are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.J. Fields, S.R. Low III and G.K. Lucey, Jr.,The Metal Science of Joining, ed. M.J. Cieslak, J.H. Perepezko, S. Kang and M.E. Glicksman (Warrendale PA: TMS, 1992), p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.E. Pratt, E.I. Stromswold and D.J. Quesnel, submitted toIEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology (1993).

  3. C.J. Thwaites and W.B. Hampshire,Welding Research Supplement (Oct. 1976), p. 323s.

  4. Masahide Harada and Ryoohei Satoh,IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology 13 (1990) p. 736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. K.R. Stone, R. Duckett, S. Muckett, M.E. Warwick and A.I. Corr,Brazing and Soldering No. 4 Doc. 636, (International Tin Research Institute, Spring 1983), p. 20.

  6. Westinghouse Report, “Development of Highly Reliable Soldered Joints for Printed Circuit Boards” (1968).

  7. H.D. Solomon,J. of Electron. Packaging 113, 102 (June 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.M. Jarobe,Thermal Fatigue Evaluations of Solder Alloys, #BDX-613-2341 (NTIS Feb. 1980), p. 1.

  9. P.N. Wild,Some Fatigue Properties of Solders and Solder Joints, No. 74Z000481 (IBM, Oct. 1975), p. 1.

  10. E.I. Stromswold, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester NY (1993).

  11. D.L. Linman,Hybrid Circuit Technology 28 (Nov. 1990).

  12. Ben Cunningham,Circuits Assembly 55 (Nov. 1990).

  13. P.C. Kasmierowecz,Circuits Assembly 59 (Aug. 1992).

  14. E.I. Stromswold, R.E. Pratt and D.J. Quesnel,Review of Scientific Instruments (in print).

  15. E.I. Stromswold, M.S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester (1990).

  16. E.I. Stromswold and D.J. Quesnel,Engineering Fracture Mechanics 41, 3, 309 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. American Society for Metals, Metals Handbook: Metallography and Phase Diagrams, 8th edition, Vol. 8 (Materials Park, OH: ASM, 1973).

  18. P. Villars and L.D. Calvert,Pearson's Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases (Materials Park, OH: ASM, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D.R. Frear, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California at Berkeley (1987).

  20. J.W. Morris, Jr., D. Grivas, D. Tribula, T. Summers and D. Frear,Proc. Department of Navy 13th Annual Electronics Manufacturing Seminar, China Lake, CA (1989).

  21. A.J. Kinloch and S.J. Shaw,J. Adhesion 12, 59 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. D.L. Hunston, A.J. Kinloch and S.S. Wang,J. Adhesion 28, 103 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Joint Committee for Powder Diffraction Studies,X-Ray Powder Data File, Inorganic Volume (Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  24. C.W. Fairhurst and J.B. Cohen,Acta Cryst. B28, 371 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stromswold, E.I., Pratt, R.E. & Quesnel, D.J. The effect of substrate surface roughness on the fracture toughness of Cu/96.5Sn-3.5Ag solder joints. J. Electron. Mater. 23, 1047–1053 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650374

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650374

Key words

Navigation