Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A study of fracture in high purity 7075 aluminum alloys

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 September 1978

Abstract

Ten different alloys based on the 7075 composition were used to study the effect of purity level, dispersoid type, and heat treatment on fracture toughness. Five purity levels ranging from 0.03 to 0.30 wt pct Fe + Si and two dispersoid types were investigated. Each alloy was given two heat treatments: the standard T651 heat treatment or a special thermomechanical treatment (TMT). Fracture toughness was measured using notched round tensile specimens taken from both the longitudinal and long-transverse directions. The notched round tensile test was modified to give the “plastic energy per unit area”. This fracture toughness parameter gave the same ranking for corresponding alloy/heat treatment combinations as the total energy per unit area measured on precracked Charpy specimens. The fracture toughness ranking for the ten alloys was the same in the longitudinal and long-transverse directions. This suggests the elongated distribution of constituent particles in the rolling direction does not change the failure mechanism. Fractographic evidence showed a bimodal distribution of ductile dimple size in all ten alloys. The number of large ductile dimples decreased with increasing purity level while the number of small ductile dimples increased. This is interpreted to mean that the smaller dispersoid and hardening particles become increasingly important in controlling the fracture toughness as the large intermetallic particles are eliminated by increasing the purity of these aluminum alloys. Since thermomechanical processing controls the amount and type of these smaller particles, it is a useful means for increasing fracture toughness in high purity aluminum alloys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Influence of Iron and Silicon Content on the Tensile Properties of 7X75 and Zr-Modified 7X75 Aluminum Plate, Technical Report Number AFML-TR-75- 140, July 1975, Air Force Materials Laboratory, WPAFB, OH. (Available through NTIS, Department of Commerce, Springfield, Va. 22151.)

  2. Effect of Iron and Silicon Content on Stress Corrosion Cracking in a Thermo- mechanically Processed Aluminum Alloy, Technical Report Number AFML- TR-75-43, July 1975, Air Force Materials Laboratory, WAPFB, OH. (Available through NTIS, Department of Commerce, Springfield, Va. 22151.)

  3. Effect of Iron and Silicon Content on the Fracture Toughness of 7X75 and Zr-Modified 7X75 Aluminum Plate, Technical Report Number AFML-TM-LL-75-10, July 1975, Air Force Materials Laboratory, WPAFB, OH. (Available through NTIS, Department of Commerce, Springfield, Va. 22151.)

  4. High Strength Aluminum Alloy Development, Technical Report Number AFML-TR-70-171, August 1970, Air Force Materials Laboratory, WPAFB, OH. (Available through NTIS, Department of Commerce, Springfield, Va. 22151.)

  5. M. V. Hyatt and W. E. Quist: unpublished Boeing data 1967.

  6. A. S. Tetelman and A. J. McEvily, Jr.:Fracture of Structural Materials, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Program to Improve the Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Resistance of Alumi- num Sheet and Plate for Airframe Applications, Technical Report Number AFML-TR-73-224, September 1973, Air Force Materials Laboratory, WPAFB, OH 45433. (Available through NTIS, Department of Commerce, Springfield, Va. 22151.)

  8. J. Waldman, H. Sulinski, and H. Markus:Met. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 573–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. P.J. Blau:Metallogr., 1975,,vol. 7, pp. 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 1975 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 10:Metals-Mechanical, Fracture,and Corrosion Testing;Fatigue;Erosion;Effect of Temperature. Proposed Method for Sharp-Notch Tension Testing of Thick High-Strength Aluminum and Magnesium Alloy Products with Cylindrical Specimens, pp. 799-810.

  11. J. S. Santner and A. Gunderson:Development of a Low Cost Reliable Test to Verify Fracture Toughness of Light Metal Alloys, Mini-Symposium of New Avenues for Progress in Aerospace Research Technology & Systems, WPAFB, OH, 25 March 1976.

  12. Rapid Inexpensive Tests for Determining Fracture Toughness, Report of the Committee on Rapid Inexpensive Tests for Determining Fracture Toughness, National Materials Advisory Board, Publication NMAB-328, National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C., 1976, (Available from Printing and Publishing Office, National Academy of Sciences, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20418.)

  13. A. W. Thompson and P. F. Weihrauch:Scripta Met., 1976, vol. 10, pp. 205–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. T. M. F. Ronald, J. A. Hall, and C. M. Pierce:Met. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, pp. 813–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Research on Synthesis of High-Strength Aluminum Alloys, Technical Report Number AFML-TR-72-199, Part II, July 1973, Air Force Materials Laboratory, WPAFB, OH, (Available through NTIS, Department of Commerce, Springfield, Va. 22151.)

  16. G. T. Hahn and A. R. Rosenfield:Met. Trans. A, 1975, vol. 6A, pp. 653–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. G. T. Hahn and A. R. Rosenfield:Relations Between Microstructure and the Fracture Toughness of Metals, Third International Conference on Fracture, Paper PL-III-211, Munich, 1973.

  18. D. Broek:A Study on Ductile Fracture, National Aerospace Laboratory, NRL, The Netherlands, NLR-TR-71021U, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. H. Van Stone and J. A. Psioda:Met. Trans. A, 1975, vol. 6A, pp. 668–70.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. S. Santner and M. E. Fine:Met. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 7A, pp. 601–04.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Damage Tolerant Design Handbook, Part I, January 1975, distributed by the National Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, Va. 22151.

  22. E. DiRusso, M. Conserva, F. Gatto, and H. Markus:Met. Trans., 1973, vol. 4, pp. 1133–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. W. H. Reimann and A. W. Brisbane:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1973, vol. 5, pp. 67–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Improvement of Helicopter Forgings by Controlled Solidification and Thermal- Mechanical Treatments, U.S. Army Aviation Systems Command, AVSCOM Report No. 76-41, October 1976, St. Louis, Mo. 63166. (Available through NTIS, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22151.)

  25. Metallurgical Factors Controlling Structure in High Strength Aluminum P/M Products, Technical Report Number AFML-TR-76-60, May 1976, Air Force Materials Laboratory, WPAFB, OH 45433. (Available through NTIS, U.S. De- partment of Commerce, Springfield, Va. 22151.)

  26. J. M. Van Orden and D. E. Pettit:MetalProgr., 1977, vol. 112, no. 8, pp. 28- 31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Metals and Ceramics Division, Air Force Materials Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 45433, OH

    Joseph S. Santner (Project Engineer)

Authors
  1. Joseph S. Santner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02652264.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santner, J.S. A study of fracture in high purity 7075 aluminum alloys. Metall Trans A 9, 769–779 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02649786

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02649786

Keywords

Search

Navigation