Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of pore structure evolution during solvent and thermal debinding of powder injection molded parts

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The solvent debinding process has been widely accepted in the powder injection molding (PIM) industry due to its short debinding cycle. In the current study, specimens were immersed in a heptane bath for different lengths of time, and the pore structure evolvement in the compact was analyzed. Mercury porosimetry analyses and scanning electron micrographs showed that the binder extraction started from the surface and progressed toward the center of the compacts. As the debinding contin-ued, the pores grew and were widely distributed in size. This pore structure evolvement was different from that of straight thermal debinding in which the pore size distribution was quite narrow and the mean pore diameter shifted toward smaller sizes as debinding time increased. After the soluble binders were extracted, parts were subjected to a subsequent thermal debinding during which these pores served as conduits for decomposed gas to escape. Concurrently, the remaining binder became fluidlike and was redistributed within the compact due to capillarity. This pore structure, as observed from the mercury intrusion curves, showed a sharp increase in the pore volume at the 0.8-µm size, followed by a series of fine pores, which is different from the pore structure of straight thermal debinding. The difference in the pore structure evolvement between solvent and thermal debinding and its effect on the debinding rate are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.M. German:Powder Injection Molding, Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, NJ, 1990, pp. 321–46.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.E. Wiech, Jr.: U.S. Patent No. 4,404,166, 1983.

  3. T.S. Wei and R.M. German:Int. J. Powder Metall., 1988, vol. 24, pp. 327–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. K.S. Hwang and T.H. Tsou:Metall. Trans. A, 1992, vol. 23A, pp. 2775–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Verweij and W.H.M. Bruggink:J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 1990, vol. 73, pp. 226–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Woodthorpe, M.J. Edirisinghe, and J.R.G. Evans:J. Mater. Sci., 1989, vol. 24, pp. 1038–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K.P. Johnson: U.S. Patent No. 4,765,950, 1988.

  8. R.E. Wiech, Jr.: U.S. Patent No. 4,197,118, 1980.

  9. J. Ebenhoch, P. Trubenbach, and D. Weinand:Powder Injection Molding Symposium—1992, P.H. Booker, J. Gaspervich, and R.M. German, eds., Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, NJ, 1992, pp. 385–92.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C.W. Finn:Int. J. Powder Metall, 1991, vol. 27, pp. 127–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. B.K. Lograsso and R.M. German:Powder Metall. Int., 1990, vol. 22, pp. 17–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. R.M. German:Int. J. Powder Metall, 1987, vol. 23, pp. 237–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Calvert and M. Cima:J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 1990, vol. 73, pp. 575–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. G.C. Stangle and I.A. Aksay:Chem. Eng. Sci., 1990, vol. 45, pp. 1719–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. F.W. Billmeyer, Jr.:Textbook of Polymer Science, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1984, pp. 151–52.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S.T. Lin and R.M. German:Powder Met. Int., 1989, vol. 21, pp. 19- 24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. I. Nanjo, M. Achikita, and S. Matsuda:Proc. 1993 Powder Metall. World Congr., Y. Bando and K. Kosuge, eds., Japan Society of Powder and Powder Metallurgy, Tokyo, 1993, pp. 241–44.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K.S. Hwang, R.M. German, and F.V. Lenel:Metall. Trans. A., 1987, vol. 18A, pp. 11–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. K.S. Hwang, R.M. German, and F.V. Lenel:Rev. Powder Metall, and Phys. Ceram., 1986, vol. 3, pp. 113–64.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H.H. Angermann and O.O. Van Der Biest:Int. J. Powder Metall, 1993, vol. 29, pp. 239–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hwang, K.S., Hsieh, Y.M. Comparative study of pore structure evolution during solvent and thermal debinding of powder injection molded parts. Metall Mater Trans A 27, 245–253 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648403

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648403

Keywords

Navigation