Skip to main content

Toward a definition of dyslexia

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adams, M.J. 1990.Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, M.J., and Bruck, M. 1995. Resolving the great debate.American Educator 19:7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychiatric Association. 1994.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aaron, P.G. 1989. Qualitative and quantitative differences among dyslexic, normal, and nondyslexic poor readers.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1:291–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bain, A.M., Bailet, L., and Moats, L.C. 1991.Written Language Disorders: Theory Into Practice. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ball, E.W., and Blachman, B.A. 1988. Phoneme segmentation training: Effects on reading readiness.Annals of Dyslexia 38:208–25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ball, E.W., and Blachman, B.A. 1991. Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling?Reading Research Quarterly 26:49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beck, I.L., and Juel, C. 1995. The role of decoding in learning to read.American Educator 19:8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bell, L.C., and Perfetti, C.A. 1994. Reading skill: Some adult comparisons.Journal of Educational Psychology 86:244–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blachman, B.A. 1991. Getting ready to read. InThe Language Continuum: From Infancy to Literacy, ed. J.F. Kavanagh. Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bradley, L., and Bryant, P.E. 1983. Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection.Nature 301:419–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brady, S. A., and Shankweiler, D. 1991.Phonological Processes in Literacy: A Tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bruck, M. 1988. The word recognition and spelling of dyslexic children.Reading Research Quarterly 23:51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruck, M. 1990. Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia.Developmental Psychology 26:439–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruck, M. 1992. Persistence of dyslexic’s phonological awareness deficits.Developmental Psychology 28:874–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cardon, L.R., Smith, S.D., Fulker. D.W., Kimberling, B.F., Pennington, B.F., and DeFries, J.C. 1994. Quantitative trait locus for reading disability on chromosome 6.Science 226:276–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Catts, H.W. 1989. Speech production deficits in developmental dyslexia.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 54:422–28.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Catts, H. 1986. Speech production/phonological deficits in reading-disordered children.Journal of Learning Disabilities 19:504–08.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chall, J.S. 1967.Learning To Read: The Great Debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Colheart, M. 1981. Disorders of reading and their implications for models of reading.Visible Language, 15:245–86.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cunningham, A.E. 1990. Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 50:429–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ehri, L.C. 1985. Sources of difficulty in learning to spell and read. InAdvances in Development and Behavioral Pediatrics, eds., M.L. Wolvaich and D. Routh. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ehri, L.C. 1989. The development of spelling knowledge and its role in reading acquisition and reading disability.Journal of Learning Disabilities 22:349–64.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fletcher, J.M. 1992. The validity of distinguishing children with language and learning disabilities according to discrepancies with IQ: Introduction to the special series.Journal of Learning Disabilities 25:546–48.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fletcher, J.M., and Morris, R. 1986. Classification of disabled learners: Beyond exclusionary definitions. InHandbook of Cognitive, Social, and Neuropsychological Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Vol. I, ed. S.J. Cicci. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Rourke, B.P., Shaywitz, S.E., and Shaywitz, B.A. 1992. The validity of discrepancy-based definitions of reading disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities 25:555–61.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Rourke, B.P., Shaywitz, S.E., and Shaywitz, B.A. 1993. Classification of learning disabilities: Relationships with other childhood disorders. InBetter Understanding Learning Disabilities: New Views From Research and Their Implications for Education and Public Policy eds. G.R. Lyon, D. Gray., J. Kavanagh, and N. Krasnegor. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fletcher, J.M., and Loveland, K.A. 1986. Neuropsychology of arithmetic disabilities in children.Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 8:23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Shankweiler, D., Katz, L., Liberman, I.Y., Steubing, K.K., Francis, D.J., Fowler, A.F. and Shaywitz, B.A. 1994. Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions.Journal of Educational Psychology 86:6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fowler, A. 1988. Grammaticality judgements and reading skill in grade 2.Annals of Dyslexia 38:73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fowler, A., and Liberman, I.Y. 1995. The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. InMorphological Aspects of Language Processing, ed. L. Feldman. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Steubing, K.K., Shaywitz, B.A., and Fletcher, J.M. 1994. Measurement of change: Assessing behavior over time and within a developmental context. InFrames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues ed. G.R. Lyon. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Frith, U., and Frith, C. 1983. Relationships between reading and spelling. InOrthography, Reading and Dyslexia eds. J. Kavanagh and R. Venezky. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Galaburda, A.M. 1988. The pathogenesis of childhood dyslexia. InLanguage, Communication, and the Brain ed. F. Plum. New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Galaburda, A.M., 1991. Anatomy of dyslexia: Argument against phrenology. InThe Reading Brain: The Biological Basis of Dyslexia eds., D.D. Duane and D.B. Gray. Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Galaburda, A.M., and Kemper, T.L. 1979. Cytoarchitectonic abnormalities in developmental dyslexia: A case study.Annals of Neurology 6:94–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Goodman, K. 1986.What’s Whole About Whole Language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Goswami, U., and Bryant, P.E. 1990.Phonological Skills and Learning to Read. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gough, P.B., Ehri, L.C., and Treiman, R., eds. 1992.Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gough, P.B., and Tunmer, W.E. 1986. Decoding, reading, and reading disability.Remedial and Special Education 7:6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hammill, D.D., Leigh, J., McNutt, G., and Larsen, S. 1981. A new definition of learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities 4:336–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hulme, C. 1988. The implausibility of low-level visual deficits as a cause of children’s reading deficits.Cognitive Neuropsychology 5:369–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hynd, G.W., Semrud-Clikeman, M., and Lyytinen, H. 1991. Brain imaging in learning disabilities. InNeuropsychological Foundations of Learning Disabilities eds. J.E. Obrzut and G.W. Hynd. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Johnson, D.J. 1994. Measurement of listening and speaking. InFrames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues ed. G.R. Lyon. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Johnson, D.J., and Myklebust, H. 1967.Learning Disabilities: Educational Principles and Practices. New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jorm, A.F., and Share, D.L. 1983. Phonological reading and acquisition.Applied Psycholinguistics 4:103–47.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Juel, C. 1988. Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades.Journal of Educational Psychology 80:437–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kamhi, A.G., Catts, H., and Mauer, J.D. 1990. Explaining speech production deficits in poor readers.Journal of Learning Disabilities 23:632–36.

    Google Scholar 

  49. LaBerge, D., and Samuels, S.J. 1974. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognitive Psychology 6:293–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lerner, J. W. 1989. Educational interventions in learning disabilities.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 28:326–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Liberman, A.M. 1992. The relation of speech to reading and writing. InOrthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning eds. R. Frost and L. Katz. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Liberman, I.Y., and Shankweiler, D. 1979. Speech, the alphabet, and teaching to read. InTheory and Practice in Early Reading (Vol. 2), eds. L.B. Resnick and P.A. Weaver. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Liberman, I.Y., and Shankweiler, D. 1985. Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write.Remedial and Special Education 6:8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., and Liberman, A.M. 1989. The alphabetic principal and learning to read. InPhonology and Reading Disability eds. D. Shankweiler and I.Y. Liberman. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lindamood, P.C. 1994. Issues in researching the link between phonological awareness, learning disabilities, and spelling. InFrames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues, ed. G.R. Lyon. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lovegrove, W., Martin, F., and Slaghuis, W. 1986. A theoretical and experimental case of a visual deficit in specific reading disability.Cognitive Neuropsychology 3:225–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lundborg, I., Olofsson, A., and Wall, S. 1980. Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phoneme awareness skills in kindergarten.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 21:159–73.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lyon, G.R. 1985. Identification and remediation of learning disability subtypes.Learning Disability Focus 1:21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lyon, G.R. 1987. Learning disabilities research: False starts and broken promises. InResearch in Learning Disabilities: Issues and Future Directions eds. S. Vaughn and C. Bos. San Diego: College-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lyon, G.R. 1988. The concept of severe discrepancy in the diagnosis of learning disabilities: Theoretical, developmental, psychometric, and educational implications.Learning Disabilities Research 3:9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lyon, G.R. 1989. IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities: A position in search of logic and data.Journal of Learning Disabilities 22:504–12.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lyon, G.R. 1994.Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues, ed. G.R. Lyon. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Lyon, G.R. 1995. Research initiatives in learning disabilities: Contributions from scientists supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Journal of Child Neurology 10:120–26.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lyon, G.R. in press. Learning Disabilities. InChildhood Psychopathology eds. E. Marsh and R. Barkley, New York: Guilford Press.

  65. Lyon, G.R. and Flynn, J.M. 1991. Assessing subtypes of learning disabilities. InHandbook on the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: Theory, Research, and Practice ed. H.L. Swanson. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lyon, G.R., Gray, D., Kavanagh, J., and Krasnegor, N. 1993.Better Understanding Learning Disabilities: New Views from Research and their Implications for Public Policies Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lyon, G.R. and Moats, L. 1988. Critical issues in the instruction of the learning disabled.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56:830–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Lyon, G.R., and Moats. L.C. 1993. An examination of research in learning disabilities: Past practices and future directions. InBetter Understanding Learning Disabilities: New Views from Research and Their Implications for Education and Public Policies eds. G.R. Lyon, D.B. Gray, J.F. Kavanaugh, and N.A. Krasnegor. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Lyon, G.R., Moats, L., and Flynn, J.M. 1989. From assessment to treatment: Linkages to interventions with children. InIssues in Child Neuropsychology: From Assessment to Treatment eds. M. Tramontana and S. Hooper. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lyon, G.R., and Rumsey, J., in press.Neuroimaging: A Window to the Neurological Foundations of Learning and Behavior in Children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

  71. Martin, F., and Lovegrove, W. 1988. Uniform & field flicker in control and specifically-disabled readers.Perception 17:203–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. McPike, E. 1995. Learning to read: Schooling’s first mission.American Educator 19:3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Moats, L.C. 1994a. The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language.Annals of Dyslexia 44:81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Moats, L.C. 1994b. Assessment of spelling in learning disabilities research. InFrames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues ed. G.R. Lyon. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Moats, L.C., and Lyon, G.R., in press. Wanted: Teachers with knowledge of language.Topics in Language Disorders.

  76. Moats, L. and Lyon, G.R. 1993. Learning disabilities in the United States: Advocacy, science, and the future of the field.Journal of Learning Disabilities 26:282–94.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Mody, M., Studdert-Kennedy, M., and Brady, S. (submitted). Speech perception deficits in poor readers: Auditory processing or phonological coding? Submitted to theJournal of Experimental Child Psychology.

  78. Morris, R. 1988. Classification of learning disabilities: Old problems and new approaches.Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 3:79–99

    Google Scholar 

  79. Morris, R. 1993. Issues in empirical versus clinical identification of learning disabilities. InBetter Understanding Learning Disabilities: New Views From Research and their Implications for Public Policies eds. G.R. Lyon, D. Gray, J. Kavanagh, and N. Krasnegor. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Morris, R., and Fletcher, J.M. 1988. Classification in neuropsychology: A theoretical framework and research paradigm.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 10:640–58.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Morris, R., Lyon, G.R., Alexander, D., Gray, D., Kavanagh, J., Rourke, B., and Swanson H.L. 1994. Proposed guidelines and criteria for describing samples of persons with learning disabilities.Learning Disabilities Quarterly 17:106–9.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Olson, R., Wise, B., Connors, F., Rack, J., and Fulker, D. 1989. Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences.Journal of Learning Disabilities 22:339–48.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Olson, R., Forsberg, Wise, B. and Rack, J. 1994. Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. InFrames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Assessment Issues ed. G.R. Lyon. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Orton, S.T. 1937.Reading, Writing, and Speech Problems in Children: A Presentation of Certain Types of Disorders in the Development of the Language Faculty. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Pennington, B.F., Gilger, J.W., Olson, R.K., and DeFries, J.C. 1992. The external validity of age-versus IQ-discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Lessons from a twin study.Journal of Learning Disabilities 29:562–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Pennington, B.F., Van Orden, G.C., Smith, S.D., Green, P.A., and Haith, M.M. 1990. Phonological processing skills and deficits in adult dyslexics.Child Development 61:1753–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Pennington, B.F. 1995. Genetics of learning disabilities.Journal of Child Neurology 10:69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Perfetti, C.A., 1985.Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Pratt, A.C., and Brady, S. 1988. Relation of phonological awareness to reading disability in children and adults.Journal of Educational Psychology 80:319–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Rayner, K., and Pollatsek, A. 1989.The Psychology of Reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Rumsey, J., Dorwart, R., Vermess, M., Denckla, M.B., Kruesi, M.J., and Rapaport, J.L. 1986. Magnetic resonance imaging of brain anatomy in severe developmental dyslexia.Archives of Neurology 43:1045–46.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Rummelhart, D.E., and McClelland, J.L. 1982. An interactive model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review 89:60–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Rutter, M. 1978. Dyslexia. InDyslexia: An Appraisal of Current Knowledge eds. A.L. Benton and D. Pearl. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Samuels, S.J., and Kamil, M.J. 1984. Models of the reading process. InHandbook of Reading Research, eds. P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, and P. Mosenthal, New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Scarborough, H.S. 1990. Very early language deficits in dyslexic children.Child Development 61:1728–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Shankweiler, D., and Crain, S. 1986. Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach.Cognition 24:139–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A.E., Liberman, A., Brady, S. A., Thornton, R., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L., Fletcher, J.M., Steubing, K.K., Shaywitz, S.E., and Shaywitz, B. A. 1995. Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax.Psychological Science 6:149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Shankweiler, D., and Liberman, I.Y., eds. 1989.Phonology and Reading Disability. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Share, D.L., McGee, R., and Silva, P. 1989. IQ and reading progress: A test of the capacity notion of IQ.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 28:97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Share, D.L., and Stanovich, K.E. 1995. Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a mode of acquisition.Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology 1:1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., Pugh, K.R., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R.K., Constable, T., Bronen, R.A., Fletcher, J.M., Liberman, A.M., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, L., Lacadie, C., and Gore, J.C., in press. The neurobiology of developmental reading disorders as viewed through the lens of neuroimaging technology. InNeuroimagaing: A Window to the Neurological Foundations of Learning and Behavior eds. G.R. Lyon and J. Rumsey. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

  102. Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M., and Shaywitz, S.E. 1995. Defining and classifying learning disabilities and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Journal of Child Neurology 10:50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Shaywitz, S.E., Escobar, M.D., Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M., and Makuch, R. 1992. Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of the normal distribution of reading ability.New England Journal of Medicine 326:145–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Shaywitz, S.E., Fletcher, J.M., and Shaywitz, B.A. 1994. A conceptual framework for learning disabilities and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder.Canadian Journal of Special Education 9:1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M., Holahan, J.M., and Shaywitz, S.E. 1992. Discrepancy compared to low achievement definitions of reading disability: Results of the Connecticut longitudinal study.Journal of Learning Disabilities 25:639–48.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Shaywitz, B.A., and Shaywitz, S.E. 1994. Measuring and analyzing change. InFrames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues ed. G.R. Lyon. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.E., Liberman, I.Y., Fletcher, J.M., Shankweiler, D., Duncan, J., Katz, L., Liberman, A., Francis, D., Dreyer, L., Crain, S., Brady, S., Fowler, A., Kier, L., Rosenfeld, N., Gore, J., and Makuch, R. 1991. Neurolinguistic and biologic mechanisms in dyslexia. InThe Reading Brain: The Biological Basis of Dyslexia eds. D.D. Duane and D.B. Gray. Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.E., Pugh, K., Constable, R.T., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R.K., Brosner, R.A., Fletcher, J.M., Shankweiler, D., Katz, L., and Gore, J.C. 1995. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language.Nature 373:607–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Shepard, M.J. 1988. Discussion. InLearning Disabilities: Proceedings of the National Conference eds. J. Kavanagh and T. Truss. Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Siegel, L.S. 1989. IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities 22:469–78.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Smith, F. 1971.Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Snowling, M. 1990.Dyslexia: A Cognitive Developmental Perspective. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Stanovich, K.E. 1980. Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency.Reading Research Quarterly 16:32–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Stanovich, K.E. 1986. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly 21:360–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Stanovich, K.E. 1990. Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, modularity.Developmental Review 19:72–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Stanovich, K.E. 1991. Word recognition: Changing perspectives. InHandbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2) eds. M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, and D. Pearson. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Stanovich, K.E. 1992. Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading acquisition. InReading Acquisition eds. P. Gough, L. Ehri, and R. Treiman. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Stanovich, K.E. 1993. The construct validity of discrepancy definitions of reading disability. InBetter Understanding Learning Disabilities: New Views on Research and Their Implications for Public Policies eds. G.R. Lyon, D. Gray, J. Kavanagh, and N. Krasnegor. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Stanovich, K.E. 1994. Romance and reality.The Reading Teacher 47:280–91.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Stanovich, K.E., and Siegel, L.S. 1994. Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model.Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 24–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Studdert-Kennedy, M., and Mody, M. in press. Auditory temporal perception deficits in the reading-impaired: A critical review of the evidence.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.

  122. Tallal, P. 1980. Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children.Brain and Language 9:182–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Tallal, P. 1988. Developmental language disorders. inLearning Disabilities: Proceedings of the National Conference eds. J.F. Kavanagh, and T.J. Truss. Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Tallal, P., and Piercy, M. 1973. Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia.Nature 241:468–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Torgesen, J.K., in press. A model of memory from an information processing perspective: The special case of phonological memory. InAttention, Memory, and Executive Function eds. G.R. Lyon and N.A. Krasnegor. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

  126. Torgesen, J.K. 1988. Discussion. InLearning Disabilities: Proceedings of the National Conference. Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  127. U.S. Office of Education. 1977. Definition and criteria for defining students as learning disabled.Federal Register 42:250, p. 65083. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Vellutino, F.R. 1979.Dyslexia: Theory and Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Vellutino, F.R., and Scanlon, D.M. 1987. Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33:321–63.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., and Tanzman, M.S. 1994. Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding, and orthographic coding. InFrames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues ed. G.R. Lyon. Baltimore: Paul. H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Venezky, R.L. 1970.The Structure of English Orthography. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Wagner, R.K. in press. From simple structure to complex function: Major trends in the development of theories, models, and measurements of memory. InAttention, Memory, and Executive Function eds. G.R. Lyon and N.A. Krasnegor. Baltimore: Paul H, Brookes Publishing.

  133. Wagner, R.K., and Torgesen, J.J. 1987. The nature of phonological processing, and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills.Psychological Bulletin 101:192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Wolff, M., Bally, H., and Morris, R. 1986. Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers.Child Development 57:900–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Wood, F. 1990. Functional neuroimaging in neurobehavioral research. InNeuromethods (Vol. 17) eds. A. Boulton, G. Baker, and M. Hiscock. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Wood, F., Felton, R., Flowers, L., and Naylor, C. 1991. Neurobehavioral definition of dyslexia. InThe Reading Brain: The Biological Basis of Dyslexia eds. D.D. Duane and D.B Gray. Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Zigmond, N. 1993. Learning disabilities from an educational perspective. InBetter Understanding Learning Disabilities: New Views From Research and Their Implications for Public Policies eds. G.R. Lyon, D. Gray, J. Kavanagh, and N. Krasnegor. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyon, G.R. Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia 45, 1–27 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648210

Download citation

Keywords

  • Word Recognition
  • Phonological Awareness
  • Reading Skill
  • Poor Reader
  • Reading Disability