Skip to main content

Computer-based compensation of adult reading disabilities

Abstract

We studied the use of computer readers, and especially their speech synthesis component, as a compensatory tool for adults with dyslexia. We first explored the enhancement of reading skills in a group of college students and working adults. Their unaided reading was very slow, and most participants in the study could sustain reading for only short periods. Although their timed comprehension was poor, their untimed comprehension was above average. The computer reader enhanced the reading rate and comprehension of most participants and enabled them to sustain reading longer. The difference between aided and unaided reading rate was inversely proportional to the unaided rate. Slower readers experienced greater enhancement than faster ones. The enhancement of comprehension was also inversely proportional to unaided scores, and good predictions of the enhancement were obtained from multiple regression models that included scores from specific standard tests of auditory and visual cognitive abilities. We also explored the use of computer readers in the workplace and show through case studies that their use can have important positive effects on individual careers and self-confidence when specific conditions exist. Finally, we investigated the use of computer readers to supplement an adult remediation program. The readers allowed and motivated the students to read more and, as a result, to progress more rapidly.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Arkenstone 1993.An Open Book Unbound. Sunnyvale, CA: Arkenstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Bennett, J., and Hanna, G. 1981.The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Geneva, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, C. 1984.A Guide to 75 Tests for Special Education. Belmont, CA: Fearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, J., Cohen, K., and Murray, C. 1993. Using computer-based readers to improve reading comprehension of students with dyslexia.Annals of Dyslexia 42:238–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinshelwood, J. 1895. Word blindness and visual memory.Lancet 2:1564–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, D., Leigh, J., McNutt, G., and Larsen, S. 1981. A new definition of learning disabilities.Learning Disability Quarterly 4:336–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E., and Zvi, J. 1995. Assistive technology for post secondary students with learning disabilities: From research to practice.Annals of Dyslexia 45:123–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. 1992. Enhancing reading comprehension with text-to-speech (DECtalk) computer system.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4:205–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. 1995. Effects of on-line reading and simultaneous DECtalk auding in helping below average and poor readers comprehend and summarize text.Learning Disabilities Quarterly 18:101–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I. 1995. The computer as a tool of remediation in the education of students with reading disabilities—a theory-based approach.Learning Disabilities Quarterly 18:89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., and Olofsson, A. 1993. Can computer speech support reading comprehension?Computers in Human Behavior 9:283–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C., and Beis, P. 1993.Slingerland High School Level Screening for the Identification of Language Strengths and Weaknesses. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., and Wise, B. 1992. Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback.Reading and Writing 4:107–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., and Wise, B. 1987. Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech. In D. Reinking (ed.),Computers and Reading: Issues for Theory and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Foltz, G., and Wise, B. 1986. Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech.Behavior Research Methods 4:165–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, B. 1970.Slingerland Screening Test for Identifying Children with Specific Learning Disability. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, B. 1981.A Multisensory Approach to Language Arts for Specific Language Disability Children. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J., and Barker, T. 1995. Computers as aids in the prevention and remediation of reading disabilities.Learning Disabilities Quarterly 18:76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. 1974.The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Middleburg Heights, OH: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, B., and Olson, R. 1995. Computer-based phonological awareness and reading instruction.Annals of Dyslexia 45:99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R., and Johnson, M. 1989.Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xerox Imaging Systems 1993.BookWise. Peabody, MA: Xerox Imaging Systems.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerome Elkind.

Additional information

Support for this study was provided by Xerox, the Luke B. Hancock Foundation, and the Charles and Helen Schwab Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elkind, J., Black, M.S. & Murray, C. Computer-based compensation of adult reading disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia 46, 159–186 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648175

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648175

Keywords

  • Reading Comprehension
  • Reading Disability
  • Dyslexia
  • Reading Rate
  • Comprehension Score