Skip to main content
Log in

Thermal barrier coating experience in gas turbine engines at Pratt & Whitney

  • Reviewed Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Spray Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pratt & Whitney has accumulated more than three decades of experience with thermal barrier coatings (TBCs). These coatings were originally developed to reduce surface temperatures of combustors of JT8D gas turbine engines to increase the thermal fatigue life of the components. Continual improvements in de-sign, processing, and properties of TBCs have extended their applications to other turbine components, such as vanes, vane platforms, and blades, with attendant increases in performance and component du-rability. Plasma-spray-based generation I (Gen I) combustor TBCs with 7 wt % yttria partially stabilized zirconia deposited by air plasma spray (APS) on an APS NiCoCrAlY bond coat continues to perform ex-tremely well in all product line engines. Durability of this TBC has been further improved in Gen II TBCs for vanes by incorporating low-pressure chamber plasma-sprayed NiCoCrAl Y as a bond coat. The modi-fication has improved TBC durability by a factor of 2.5 and altered the failure mode from a “black fail-ure” within the bond coat to a “white failure” within the ceramic.

Further improvements have been accomplished by instituting a more strain-tolerant ceramic top layer with electron beam/physical vapor deposition (EB-PVD) processing. This Gen III TBC has demonstrated exceptional performance on rotating airfoils in high-thrust-rated engines, improving blade durability by three times through elimination of blade creep, fracture, and rumpling of metallic coatings used for oxi-dation protection of the airfoil surfaces. A TBC durability model for plasma-sprayed as well as EB-PVD systems is proposed that involves the accumulation of compressive stresses during cyclic thermal expo-sure. The model attempts to correlate failure of the various TBCs with elements of their structure and its degradation with thermocyclic exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.M. Meier and D.K. Gupta, The Evolution of Thermal Barrier Coat- ings in Gas Turbine Engine Applications,J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (Trans. ASME), Vol 116, 1994, p 250–257

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J.T. DeMasi, M. Ortiz, and K.D. Sheffler, “Thermal Barrier Coating Life Prediction Model Development, Phase I Final Report”, NASA Cr-182230, NASA-Lewis Research Center, 1989

  3. R.A. Miller and C.E. Lowell, Failure Mechanisms of Thermal Barrier Coatings Exposed to Elevated Temperature,Thin Solid Films, Vol 95, 1982, p 265–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bose, S., DeMasi-Marcin, J. Thermal barrier coating experience in gas turbine engines at Pratt & Whitney. JTST 6, 99–104 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02646318

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02646318

Keywords

Navigation