Abstract
The systems approach permits us to analyze national security as a cluster of interconnected elements, in which the environmental dimension appears to be the most important one. The environmental problem is divided into two main aspects: environmental security per se and the impact of environment on the overall status of a nation's security. It is argued here that the quality of life and health serve as both the main objective and the principal criterion of environmental security in a social system. Indices of these two factors are used in this article as indicators of the state of this type of security. They confirm that vast areas of Russia, the Ukraine, and Central Asia (especially the Aral Sea region) should be considered as presenting a substantial risk to local people and even producing global impacts on both natural and man-made systems. Environmental factors that destabilize national security are also divided into two groups: those that impact social systems directly and negatively (mainly natural disasters) and technological and sociopolitical agents that cause indirect impacts, in both war and peace time, as well as in the civil and military sectors of the economy. Developments in the former Soviet Union (the Commonwealth of Independent States) are used as an illustration of the consequences that such impacts may have on the status of national security.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Argumenty y Facty. 1991. (Untitled) 7:3 (Moscow).
Baburin, V. L. 1990. Socialno-economicheskaya otzenka opasnych prirodnich yavleniy. Pages 23–29in S. M. Myagkov (ed.), Opasniye prirodniye yavleniya. State University, Moscow.
Dergachev, A. 1991. Sledi Chernobilya v centre Sochi.Izvestiya 35, 9 February (Moscow).
Glotov, B. 1990. Otkuda “globaya” voda?Pravda 11 May (Moscow).
Gosudarstvennaya Programma. 1990. Gosudarstvennaya Programma po Ochranye Okruzhayuschey Sredi i Ratzionalnomu Ispolzovaniyu Prirodnich Resursov SSSR na 1991–1995 Godi y na Perspektivu do 2005 Goda. Proekt.Pravitelstvenniy Vestnik 40:5–6.
Koryakin, Yu. I. 1990. Socialniye aspecti yadernoi energetiki.Energeticheskoye Stroitelstvo 8:8–12.
Kunreuther, H. 1980. Decision making for low-probability events: A conceptual framework. WP-80-169, IIASA, Luxembourg.
Legasov, V. A. 1987. Iz segodnaya—v zavtra.Pravda 5 October: 5 (Moscow).
Manucharova. 1991. Sekreti oplachenniye zdoroviem.Izvestiya 20, 23 January (Moscow).
NATO. 1989. Facts and figures. North Atlantic Treaty Organization Information Service, Brussels, 386 pp.
Nikipelov, B. V., G. N. Romanov, L. A. Buldakov, N. S. Babaev and Yu. B. Kholina. 1989. Radiatzionnaya avariya na Yuzhnom Urale.Atomnaya Energetika 67(2):22–30.
Otway, H., and P. Pahner. 1976. Risk assessment.Futures 8:122–134.
Otway, H., and K. Thomas. 1982. Reflections on risk perception and policy.Risk Analysis 2(2):69–82.
Porfiriev, B. N. 1990. Economicheskiye i organitzatzionnoupravlecheskiye problemi ekologisheskoi politiki v SSSR.Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Serie economicheskaya 3:22–30 (Moscow).
Porfiriev, B. N. 1991a. The concept of national security and its environmental aspects.National Security and Strategic Stability 1:111–129 (Moscow).
Porfiriev, B. N. 1991b. Premières victimes, les enfants.La Croix 32881 (26 Avril):4.
Reshetnikov, V. 1991. Neuzheli obyazatelno nuzhni katastrofi?Izvestiya 23, 26 January (Moscow).
Shevchenko, V. A. 1990. The genetic consequences of the impact of ionizing radiation on the natural population after Kyshtym and Chernobyl. Proceedings of the seminar on assessment of the environmental impact of radionuclides released during major nuclear accidents: Kyshtym, Windscale and Chernobyl. International Radiological Union, Luxembourg, October 1–5 1990.
Sivard, R. L. 1991. World Military and Social Priorities, 1991. World Priorities, Washington, DC, 64 pp.
Slovik, P. 1987. Perception of risk.Science 236:280–285.
Slovic, P., B. Fischhof, and S. Lichtenstein. 1979. Rating the risks.Environment 21(3):14–17, 36–39.
Slovic, P., B. Fischhof, and S. Lichtenstein. 1980. Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. Pages 181–216in R. C. Shwing and W. A. Albers, Jr. (eds.), Societal risk assessment: How safe is safe enough? Plenum Press, New York.
Starr, C. 1969. Societal benefit versus technological risk.Science 165:1232–1238.
Sverdlik, Sh. B. 1990. Volny ekonomist prtoiv vsey korolevskoi rati.ECO 12:111–118.
Vasinsky, A. 1992. Budem zhivi-ne pomrem.Izvestiya 56, 6 March.
Verchovny Soviet. 1990. Postanovleniye “O edinoy programme po likvidatzii postedstviy avarii na Chernobylskoi AES i situatzii, svyazannoi s etoi avariyei.”Pravda 25 April (Moscow).
Vlek, C., and P.-I. Stallen. 1981. Judging risks and benefits in the small and large.Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance 2:235–271.
Whelan, E. 1985. The toxic terror: The truth about the scare of cancer. Samson Books, Ottawa, Illinois.
Yablokov, A. V. 1989. Vistuplenie na i Sziezde narodnich deputatov SSSR.Pravda 10 April: 2 (Moscow).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Porfiriev, B.N. The environmental dimension of national security: A test of systems analysis methods. Environmental Management 16, 735–742 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02645663
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02645663