Skip to main content
Log in

Fracture toughness and fatigue behavior of matrix II and M-2 high speed steels

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of heat treatment and of the presence of primary carbides on the fracture toughness,K Ic and the fatigue crack growth rates,da/dN, have been studied in M-2 and Matrix II high speed steels. The Matrix II steel, which is the matrix of M-42 high speed steel, contained many fewer primary carbides than M-2, but both steels were heat treated to produce similar hardness values at the secondary hardening peaks. The variation of yield stress with tempering temperature in both steels was similar, but the fracture toughness was slightly higher for M-2 than for Matrix II at the secondary hardening peaks. The presence of primary carbides did not have an important influence on the values ofK Ic of these hard steels. Fatigue crack growth rates as a function of alternating stress intensity, ΔK, showed typical sigmoidal behavior and followed the power law in the middle-growth rate region. The crack growth rates in the near threshold region were sensitive to the yield strength and the grain sizes of the steels, but insensitive to the sizes and distribution of undissolved carbides. The crack growth rates in the power law regime were shifted to lower values for the steels with higher fracture toughness. SEM observations of the fracture and fatigue crack surfaces suggest that fracture initiates by cleavage in the vicinity of a carbide, but propagates by more ductile modes through the matrix and around the carbides. The sizes and distribution of primary carbides may thus be important in the initiation of fracture, but the fracture toughness and the fatigue crack propagation rates appear to depend on the strength and ductility of the martensite-austenite matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.L. Averbach:Metal Progress, 1980, vol. 118, no. 8, pp. 19–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. A. Rescalvo and B. L. Averbach:Metall. Trans. A, 1979, vol. 10A, pp. 1265–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. L. R. Olsson and F. Fischmeister:Powder Met., 1978, vol. 21, pp. 13–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S.C. Lee and F.J. Worzala:Metall. Trans. A, 1981, vol. 12A, pp. 1477–84.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Eriksson:Scand. J. Metall., 1973, vol. 2, pp. 197–203.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. E.A. Almond and R.S. Irani:Powder Met., 1981, vol. 24, pp. 105–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. ASTM E399-81, “Standard Test Method for Plane Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials,” Amer. Soc. for Testing and Materials, 1981, Philadelphia, PA.

  8. J. Durnin and K. A. RActal:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1968, vol. 206, pp. 60–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Berry and M. J. Kadhim Al-Tornachi:Metals Technology, 1977, pp. 289-95.

  10. G. R. Speich, D. S. Dabrowski, and L. F. Porter:Metall. Trans., 1973, vol. 4, pp. 303–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R.O. Ritchie:Metal Science, 1977, vol. 11, pp. 368–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. R.O. Ritchie, F. A. McClintock, H. N-Hashemi, and M. A. Ritter:Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 101–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Tanaka and T. Mura:Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 111–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lou, B., Averbach, B.L. Fracture toughness and fatigue behavior of matrix II and M-2 high speed steels. Metall Trans A 14, 1889–1898 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02645560

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02645560

Keywords

Navigation