Abstract
A model is developed for the kinetics of nucleation and growth of methane bubbles in the hydrogen attack of carbon steel. It is concluded that at high temperatures the time to incubate fissuring along grain boundaries is determined by the rate of iron diffusion away from microscopic growing bubbles. At lower temperatures and/or higher hydrogen pressures carbon supply is limiting. The equations fit the observed incubation times if the bubble density is high (~107/cm2) and essentially independent of temperature (T) and hydrogen pressure (P) over a wide range. It is postulated that the number of growing bubbles is limited at high nucleation rates (lowT and highP) by carbon starvation. At hiT and lowP chemisorption to lower the solid-vapor surface energy or fine inclusions are required to aid nucleation. A quantitative analysis of these processes leads to several predictions which can be checked experimentally.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Steel for Hydrogen Service at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures in Petroleum Refineries and Petrochemical Plants, API Publ. 941, July 1970.
Numerous papers resulted from this long term project. Essentially all were published in Proc. API. The principal investigators on the project have been F. H. Vitovec 1960-66, G. Geiger 1966-70, and F. J. Worzala 1970-73.
L. C. Wiener:Corrosion, 1961, vol. 17, pp. 137–43.
R. E. Allen, R. J. Jansen, P. C. Rosenthal, and F. H. Vitovec: Proc. API 1962, vol. 42, pp. 452–62.
H. J. Grabke and E. Martin:Arch Eisenhuettenw., 1972, vol. 44, pp. 837–42.
D. A. Westphal and F. J. Worzala:Hydrogen in Metals, I. M. Bernstein and A. W. Thompson, eds., pp. 78-89, ASM, 1974.
J. C. Swartz:Trans. TMS-AIME 1969, vol. 245, pp. 1083–92.
D. Keefer and C. A. Wert:Trans. TMS-AIME 1959, vol. 215, p. 114.
Methane data-X4A04FThermochemieal Data, 2nd ed., June 1971, NSRDS- NBS-37. Fe3C data—L. Darken and R. Gurry,Physical Chemistry of Metals, p. 401, McGraw Hill, N.Y., 1953.
H. H. Podgurski:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1961, vol. 221, pp. 389–94.
M. L. Hill and E.W. Johnson:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1959, vol. 215, pp. 717–25.
H. S. Carslaw and J. C. Jaeger:Conduction of Heat in Solids, Clarendon Press, 2nded., p. 191, 1959.
M.V. Speight and J. E. Harris:Metal Sci. J., 1967, vol. l,pp. 83–85.
R. Raj and M. Ashby:Acta Met., 1975, vol. 23, pp. 653–66.
Sten Bergh:Jarnkont. Ann., 1962, vol. 146, pp. 748–62. For an extended summary in English see Roland Kiessling:Non-Metallic Inclusions in Steel Part III, ISI Special Report 115. 1958, pp. 1-7.
M. Ashby and R. M. A. Centamore:Acta Met., 1968, vol. 16, p. 1081.
R. E. Miller, J. B. Hudson, G.S. Ansell:Met. Trans. A, 1975, vol. 6A, pp. 117–21.
L. Deffet and F. Ficks:Adv. in Thermophys., Prop at Extreme Tand P, Proc. of 3rd Symp., Serge Gratch, ed., ASME, 1965, pp. 107-13.
C.A. Wert:Phys. Rev., 1950, vol. 79, p. 601. (D = 0.02 exp (-20, 100/RT)cm2/s.)
F. S. Buffington, K. Hirano, and M. Cohen:Acta Met., 1961, vol. 9, p. 434. (D = 2.0 exp (-57,300/RT)cm2/s.)
D. W. James and G. M. Leak:Phil. Mag., 1965, vol. 12, p. 491. (D° = 1.1 × 10-6 exp (-41,500/RT)cm3/s.)
R. H. Harrison, R. T. Moore, and D. R. Douslin:J. Chem. Eng. Data, 1973, vol. 18, p. 131, report measurements on methane up to 350°C and 370 atm where the activity coefficient is 1.11, and 1.097 at 300°C and 371 atm. No equation exists for extrapolation to the significantly higher pressures of interest here.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Formerly Director, Division Material Research, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shewmon, P.G. Hydrogen attack of carbon steel. Metall Trans A 7, 279–286 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02644468
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02644468