Comparison of percutaneous and endoscopic retrograde removal of postoperatively retained bile duct stones

Abstract

Forty-one patients underwent nonsurgical removal of postoperatively retained bile duct stones in two nonrandomized groups. The endoscopic-retrograde technique was used in 21 patients, and succeeded in 19. The percutaneous approach through the T-tube tract was used in 22 patients, including the two in whom endoscopic stone removal had failed, and was successful in 21 patients. Individual preferences and prior history introduced a selection bias against the percutaneous technique. Auxiliary extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) was used in 2 patients whose stones could not be fragmented mechanically by the percutaneous basket technique. ESWL was successful in one patient but failed in the second. Because endoscopy had also failed in this case, the patient subsequently underwent repeat surgery. Procedure-related complications were minor with both techniques and were readily treated by conservative measures. We conclude that both the retrograde and the percutaneous approaches are effective and safe. The endoscopic approach appears convenient because there is no need to await maturation of the percutaneous tract, but sphincterotomy carries a small but distinctive risk. Because the percutaneous approach uses an existing tract, is only minimally invasive and leaves the sphincter of Oddi intact, it is preferable in those patients who have T-tubes of approapriate size and position in place.