Skip to main content
Log in

Aqueous extraction—An alternative oilseed milling process

  • Technical
  • Symposium: Processing Methods for Oilseeds Presented at the AOCS 64th Annual Spring Meeting New Orleans, Louisiana
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society

Abstract

Oil can be removed from oilseed materials by a process which consists of an aqueous extraction of the comminuted seed, followed by a centrifugal separation which divides the aqueous extract into oil, solid, and aqueous phases. The protein may be recovered in the solids or aqueous phase, depending upon the conditions selected. Unit operations of this process are grinding, solid-liquid separation, centrifugation, demulsification, and drying of products. Aqueous extraction has been applied, to date, to coconuts and peanuts. For coconuts, a procedure has been developed to recover 93% of the oil and 91% of the protein. The major protein product is 25% protein and, when reconstituted in water, forms an acceptable beverage. The estimated production cost of this product is $.24/1b. For peanuts, the recovery of oil was 89% and protein 92% for the concentrate procedure, whereas the corresponding values for the isolate procedure were 86% and 89%, respectively. The costs of production were estimated as $.17/1b of concentrate (67% protein) and $.28/1b of isolate (89% protein). Aqueous extraction offers several advantages over conventional solvent extraction-less initial capital investments, safer operation, capability of discontinuous operation, and production of a variety of products. Another advantage of aqueous processing is the capability for utilization of certain chemicals to remove or inactivate undesirable substances. In the case of peanuts, hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypoehlorite have proven to be effective for destruetion of aflatoxins. Aqueous processing has the potential for application to a variety of other oilseeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chayen, I.H., and D.R. Ashworth, J. Appl. Chem. 3:529 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sugarman, N., U.S. Pat. 2,762,820 (1956).

  3. Dangoumau, A., Rev. Franc. Corps Gras 5:254 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Subrahmanyan, J., D.S. Bhatia, S.S. Kalbag, and N. Subramanian, JAOCS 36:66 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chayen, I.H., U.S. Pat. 2,928,821 (1960).

  6. Rajasekharan, N., “Chemical and Technological Investigations on Coconut Products,” Thesis, Banaras Hindu University, Utter Pradash, India, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bhatia, D.S., M.A.B. Parpia, and B.P. Baliga, J. Food Sci. Technol. (India) 3:2 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eapan, K.E., S.S. Kalbag, and V. Subrahmanyan, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 43:585 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rajasekharan, N., and A. Sreenivasan, J. Food Sci. Technol. (India) 4:59 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sreenivasan, A., “Nutrition Document,” R9/Add 5 PAG, WHO-FAO-UNICEF, Geneva, 1963.

  11. Smith, R.H., Adv. Chem. Series 57:133 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Orr, E., and D. Adair, “Tropical Products Institute Report,” G-31, Ministry of Overseas Development, Great Britain, June 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hagenmaier, R.D., C.M. Cater, and K.F. Mattil, J. Food Sci. 38:516 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rhee, K.C., C.M. Cater, and K.F. Mattil, Ibid. 37:90 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rhee, K.C., C.M. Cater, and K.F. Mattil, Ibid. 38:126 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Watt, B.K. and A.L. Merrill, “Agricultural Handbook,” No. 8, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1963.

  17. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Agricultural Statistics,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1972.

  18. Rhee, K.C., K.R. Natarajan, C.M. Cater, and K.F. Mattil, J. Amer. Peanut Res. Education Assoc. 4:215 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sreenivasamurthy, V., H.A.B. Parpia, S. Srikanta, and A.S. Murti, J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. chemists 50:350 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fischbach, H., and A.D. Campbell, Ibid. 48:28 (1965).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sosulski, F.W., and C.W. McCleary, J. Food Sci. 37:253 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sosulski, F.W., F.S. Soliman, and R.S. Bhatty, Can. Inst. Food Technol. J 5:101 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Cater, C.M., Rhee, K.C., Hagenmaier, R.D. et al. Aqueous extraction—An alternative oilseed milling process. J Am Oil Chem Soc 51, 137–141 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02639723

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02639723

Keywords

Navigation