Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of antioxidants for fats on an equivalent molar basis

  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society

Summary

An oven incubation method for determining the relative effectiveness of antioxidants is described, which has yielded results with an over-all average variation of 2.07%. The antioxidants were compared on an equivalent molar basis, and potencies are expressed as a “catechol index”.

The catechol index of a given antioxidant is defined as the ratio of its antioxidant activity to that of an equivalent molar concentration of catechol. It provides a quantitative measure of the relative effectiveness of various antioxidants, which takes into consideration the concentration of antioxidant, the induction periods of the stabilized sample and control substrate, and, at least to some extent, the substrate used.

Catechol indexes of 28 phenolic compounds are given and discussed, and several relationships between structure and antioxygenic activity are pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Golumbic, C., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,63, 1142 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Golumbic, C., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,63, 1163 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Golumbic, C., Oil and Soap,23, 184 (1946).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Golumbic C., and Mattill, H. A., Oil and Soap,19, 144 (1942).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Riemenschneider, R. W., Luddy, F. E., Herb, S. F., and Turer, J., Oil and Soap,22, 174 (1945).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morris, S. G., and Riemenschneider, R. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,26, 638 (1949).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bickoff, E. M., J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.,28, 65 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fore, Sara A., Moore, R. N., and Bickford, W. G., J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.,28, 73 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Golden, M. J., J. Am. Pharm. Assoc.40, 119 (1951).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bates, R. W., and Ast, H. J., J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.,25, 42 (1948).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wheeler, D. H., Oil and Soap,9, 69 (1932).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Riemenschneider, R. W., Turer, J., and Speck, R. M., Oil and Soap,20, 169 (1943).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagy, J. J., Beadle, B. W., and Kraybill, H. R., Oil and Soap,22, 123 (1945).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lundberg, W. O., Halvorson, H. O., and Burr, G. O., Oil and Soap,21, 33 (1944).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bickoff, E., Williams, K. T., and Sparks, M., Oil and Soap,22, 128 (1945).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore, R. N., and Bickford, W. G., J. Am. Oil. Chem. Soc.,28, 73 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Higgins, J. W., and Black, H. C., Oil and Soap,21, 277 (1944).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Journal paper no. 981, Purdue Agricultural Experiment Station.

About this article

Cite this article

Everson, C.W., Miller, G.J. & Quackenbush, F.W. Comparison of antioxidants for fats on an equivalent molar basis. J Am Oil Chem Soc 34, 81–83 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02638026

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02638026

Keywords

Navigation