Skip to main content
Log in

Crime as a negotiated commodity: The police use of informers

  • Essays
  • Published:
The journal of Human Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Criminologists have long been interested in the relationship between policing and community participation. Traditionally, it has been argued that law enforcement agencies are dependent upon the general community for crime information. Recently, however, there is a growing interest among criminologists to explore the dependency relations police create within different subpopulations, especially diverse street subcultures.

This study explores the social organization of police-street hustlers relations. Using qualitative data on 70 hustlers and 50 police officers, we examine how crime is manipulated as a commodity in advancing the interests of informers and the police. It is argued that although separate and unrelated situational factors are important, a more comprehensive understanding of the nature of these exchanges warrants an investigation of social networks and law. It is concluded that the informal contexts of law significantly pervade the informal contexts of these encounters. This topic demands considerable attention given the lack of organizational policies or standards which jeopardizes public confidence and erodes the informer's constitutional protections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bottoms, A. and J. McClean,Defendants in the Criminal Process. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, S.,Power, Crime and Mystification London: Tavistock, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R.:Making Crime: A Study of Detective Work Toronto: Butterworths, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson R. and P. Baranek,The Ordering of Justice Toronto University of Toronto Press 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.Discipline and Punish New York: Pantheon, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.Power/Knowledge New York: Pantheon, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuykendall, J. “The Municipal Police Detective: An Historical Analysis”Criminology 24(1), 1986::175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P.:The Narc's Game Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, G. “Who Really Gets Stung: Some Issues Raised by the New Police Undercover Work”Crime and Delinquency 8, 1982:165–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBarnet, D. “Arrest: The Legal Context of Policing” S. Holdoway (ed.)The British Police London: E. Arnold, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., “Observations of Police Undercover Work”Criminology 25(1), 1987:27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. “Assertions of Power: An Examination of Marginal Negotiations Between Police Officers and Citizens”. Unpublished M.A. thesis, York University, 1986.

  • Rubinstein, J.: “City Police New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J.:Justice Without Trial, New York: Wiley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes and Social Order, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk, A.Political Criminality Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. and L. Guess “The Informant: A Narcotics Enforcement Dilemma”Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 13, 1981:235–245.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visano, L. Crime as a negotiated commodity: The police use of informers. The Journal of Human Justice 2, 105–115 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02637533

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02637533

Keywords

Navigation