Abstract
This paper describes LCW, a procedure for learning customer preferences represented as feature weights by observing customers' selections from return sets. An empirical evaluation on simulated customer behavior indicated that uninformed hypotheses about customer weights lead to low ranking accuracy unless customers place some importance on almost all features or the total number of features is quite small. In contrast, LCW's estimate of the mean preferences of a customer population improved as the number of customers increased, even for larger numbers of features of widely differing importance. This improvement in the estimate of mean customer preferences led to improved prediction of individual customers' rankings, irrespective of the extent of variation among customers and whether a single or multiple retrievals were permitted. The experimental results suggest that the return set that optimizes benefit may be smaller for customer populations with little variation than for customer populations with wide variation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonzano A, Cunningham P, Smyth B (1997) Using introspective learning to improve retrieval in CBR: a case study in air traffic control. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on case-based reasoning (ICCBR-97) Providence. RI. Springer, Berlin, pp 291–302
Branting K (1999) Active exploration in instance-based preference modeling. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on case-based reasoning (ICCBR-99), Monastery Seeon, Germany. Lecture Notes in artificial intelligence 1650
Branting K, Broos P (1997) Automated acquisition of user preferences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46:55–77
Burke R, Hammond K, Kulyukin V, Lytinen S, Tomuro N, Schoenberg S (1997) Question answering from frequently-asked question files: experiences with the FAQ finder system. Technical report TR-97-05, University of Chicago, Department of Computer Science
Dent L, Boticario J, McDermott J, Mitchell T, Zabowski D (1992) A personal learning apprentice. In Proceedings of the 10th national conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI Press/MIT Press, San Jose, CA, pp 96–103
Goldberg D, Nichols D, Oki B, Terry D (1992) Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM 35(12):61–70
Keeney R, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Kira K, Rendell L (1992) The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm. In Proceedings of the 10th national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-92). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 129–134
Kohlmaier A, Schmitt S, Bergmann R (2001) A similiarity-based approach to attribute selection in user-adaptive sales dialogs In Aha D, Watson I (eds) Fourth international confernece on case-based reasoning (ICCBR 2001), Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 2080. Springer, Berlin, pp 306–320
Kolodner J (1984) Retrieval and organizational strategies in conceptual memory: a computer model Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Maes P (1994) Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM 37(n7):31–40
Nielson J (2000) Designing web usability. New Riders, Indianapolis, IN
Stahl A (2001) Learning feature weights from case order feedback. In Aha D, Watson I (eds). Case-based reasoning research and development: 4th international conference on case-based reasoning (ICCBR 2001). Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 2080. Springer, Berlin, pp 502–516
Sweller J, Chandler P, Tierney P, Cooper M (1990) Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General pp 176–192
Wettschereck D, Aha D (1995) Weighting features. In Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 1010. Springer, Berlin, pp 347–358
Wilke W (1999) Knowledge management for intelligent sales support in electronic commerce. PhD thesis, University of Kaiserslautern
Wilke W, Lenz M, Wess S (1998) Intelligent sales support with CBR. In Lenz M, Bartsch-Spoerl B, Burkhard H-D, Wess S (eds) Case-based reasoning technology: from foundations to applications. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 1400. Springer Berlin, pp 91–113
Zhang Z, Yang Q (1999) Dynamic refinement of feature weights using quantitative introspective learning. In Sixteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-99). Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA pp 228–233
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Branting, L.K. Learning feature weights from customer return-set selections. Knowledge and Information Systems 6, 188–202 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02637155
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02637155