Skip to main content
Log in

Nonionic surfactant polarity index determination by inverse gas chromatography

  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

Abstract

Polyglycol nonionic surfactants are widely used in industrial and consumer products. Two classes of these surfactants, made from selected combinations of 1,2-butylene oxide, propylene oxide and ethylene oxide, were compared to alcohol ethoxylate (AE) and nonyl phenol ethoxylate nonionic surfactants in this study. Polyglycol copolymers consisted of either a polypropylene glycol (PPG) or polybutylene glycol (PBG) central hydrophobe. Ethoxylation of the hydrophobes produced polyethylene glycol hydrophilic blocks. Differences in hydrophobe polarity were determined by inverse gas chromatography (IGC). IGC is a useful analytical method by which the physical and chemical characteristics of a material are studied. The stationary surfactant material under study was coated onto an inert support and used as the packing for the column. A probe mixture, containing simple organic molecules of varying polarity, was injected, and the retention characteristics were measured. The retention characteristics of the standard probe mixture were used to reveal relative polarity information about the stationary surfactant coatings. Polarities of the four hydrophobes were (in decreasing order): PPG, PBG, nonyl phenyl and fatty alkyl. Comparisons were then made between the calculated hydrophile-lipophile balance values and polarity indices of the hydrophobes and their ethoxylates. The effects of hydroxyl groups on polarity were also studied and quantified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Becher, P., and R.L. Birkmeier,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 41:169 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Munk, P., inModern Methods of Polymer Characterization, edited by H.G. Barth, and J. W Mays, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1991, Chapter 5, p. 151.

  3. Newman, R.D., and J.M. Prausnitz,J. Paint Tech. 45:33 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schott, H.,J. Pharm. Sci. 73:790 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sen, A.K., and R. Kumar,J. Soc. Trib. Lub. Eng. 47:211 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Poole, C.F., T.O. Kollie and S.K. Poole,Chromatographia 34:281 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kersten, B.R., and C.F. Poole,J. Chromatog. 452:191 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Inui, T., Y. Murakami, T. Suzuki and Y. Takegami,Polymer J. 14:261 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Munk, P., Z.Y. Al-Saigh and T.W. Card,Macromolecules 18:2196 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kollie, T.O., and C.F. Poole,J. Chromatog. 556:457 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heubner, V.R.,Analytical Chem. 34:488 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, S.A., B. Bann and R.D. Thrower,J. Chem. Soc. 3623 (1950).

  13. Szymanowski, J., J. Nowicki and A. Voelkel,Coll. & Pol. Sci. 257:494 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Voelkel, A., J. Szymanowski and W. Hreczuch,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 70:711 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Nace, V.M., Knoell, J.C. Nonionic surfactant polarity index determination by inverse gas chromatography. J Am Oil Chem Soc 72, 89–95 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02635784

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02635784

Key words

Navigation