Advertisement

Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society

, Volume 47, Issue 10, pp 384–388 | Cite as

Preparation of epiminostearates. Comparison of methods

  • T. A. Foglia
  • G. Maerker
  • G. R. Smith
Technical

Abstract

The addition of N,N-dichlorourethan (DCU) to internal olefins has been found to be an acceptable reaction leading to the preparation of internal fatty acid aziridines. The yields of isolated epimino derivatives are in the 50–60% range, only slightly lower than those obtained by the iodine isocyanate (INCO) method. In order to compare the stereochemistry of the two methods, an IR spectroscopic procedure was developed which permits an estimation of the relative amounts ofcis- andtrans-aziridines in mixtures of the two. In agreement with literature reports, the INCO method is stereospecific, thecis-olefins giving rise tocis-aziridines and thetrans-olefins formingtrans-aziridines. On the other hand, DCU addition to olefins results in mixtures ofcis- andtrans-aziridines in which the latter isomers predominate. This finding is compatible with the reported free-radical nature of the DCU reaction.

Keywords

Methyl Oleate Ring Closure Aziridine Boron Trifluoride Etherate Methyl Elaidate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fanta, P. E., in Heterocyclic Compounds with Three and Four Membered Rings, Part I, Edited by A. Weissberger, ed., Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1964, p. 524–575 and references listed therein.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gembitskii, P. A., N. M. Loim and D. S. Zhuk, Russ. Chem. Rev. (English Transl.)35, 105–122 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gebelein, C. G., G. Swift and D. Swern, J. Org. Chem.32, 3314–3317 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McGhie, B. F., and B. T. Warren, Chem. and Ind.1968, 253.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Foglia, T. A., and D. Swern, J. Org. Chem.31, 3625–3631 (1966).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foglia, T. A., and D. Swern, Ibid.32, 75–78 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foglia, T. A., and D. Swern, Ibid.33, 766–771 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dyen, M. E., H. C. Hamann and D. Swern, JAOCS43, 431–432 (1966).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maerker, G., E. T. haeberer, L. M. Gregory and T. A. Foglia, Anal. Chem.41, 1698–1700 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosen, S., and D. Swern, Ibid.38, 1392–1397 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hassner, A., and C. C. Heathcock, Tetrahedron Lett.1963, 393–397.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hassner, A., and C. C. Heathcock, Ibid. 1125–1130 (1964).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hassner, A., and C. C. Heathcock, Tetrahedron20, 1037–1042 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hassner, A., and C. C. Heathcock, J. Org. Chem.29, 3640–3645 (1964).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maerker, G., E. T. Haeberer and T. A. Foglia, Chem. and Ind.1968, 1524–1525.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rabourn, W. J., and W. L. Howard, J. Org. Chem.27, 1039–1041 (1962).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The American Oil Chemists' Society 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. A. Foglia
    • 1
  • G. Maerker
    • 1
  • G. R. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Eastern Utilization Research and Development DivisionPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations