Advertisement

Remediation of contaminated soils with green plants: An overview

  • Scott D. Cunningham
  • William R. Berti
Special—Bioremediation

Summary

Billions of dollars each year are spent on the remediation of contaminated soils in the United States alone. Contaminated soils represent an economic liability as well as a technical challenge. New technologies are needed to address numerous contaminants, especially those that are neither volatile nor mobile in soil solutions. One emerging technology, “phytoremediation”, employs green plants in the remediation process. The technique is relatively new, with few field demonstrations; however, it represents an ever-growing area of research built on a sound technical basis. This technology draws heavily from a wide range of agronomic, biological, and engineering disciplines. Exploiting all plant-influenced biological, microbial, chemical, and physical processes to remediate contaminated sites is the goal of much research in this area. In certain situations, sites remediated with a plant- based technology are expected to have significant economic, aesthetic, and technical advantages over traditional engineering solutions. This paper provides an overview of the phytoremediation area with an emphasis on providing background information and research avenues to plant biologists.

Key words

hydrocarbons heavy metals pollution metabolism detoxification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, T. A.; Walton, B. T. Comparative plant uptake and microbial degradation of trichlorethylene in the rhizospheres of five plant species—implications for bioremediation of contaminated surface soils. Oak Ridge, TN: OakRidge National Laboratory. Environmental Science Division, Pub. 3809. ORNL/TM-12017; 1992.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker, A. J. M.; McGrath, S. P. In situ decontamination of heavy metal polluted soils using crops of metal accumulating plants—a feasibility study. In: Hinchee, R. E., ed. In situ bioreclamation. Butterworth-Heinemann; Boston. 1991.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, A. J. M.; Brooks, R. R. Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metalic elements—a review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery 1:81–126; 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker, A. J. M.; Brooks, R. R.; Reeves, R. Growing for gold…and copper… and zinc. New Sci. 10 March:44–48; 1988.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banks, K. M.; Schwab, A. P. Dissipation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the rhizosphere. In: Symposium on bioremediation of hazardous wastes: research, development and field evaluations. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-93/054; 1993:246.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bell, R. M. Higher plant accumulation of organic pollutants from soils. USEPA, Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. EPA/600/SR-92/138; Oct. 1992.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyle, J. J.; Shann, J. R. Biodegradation of 2,4-D and phenol in the plant rhizosphere. Abstracts. SETAC 13th annual meeting, Nov. 1992:243.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bromilow, R. H.; Chamberlain, K. (1989) Designing molecules for systemicity. In RK Atkin, DR Clifford, eds, Mechanisms and Regulation of Transport Processes. Monograph 18. British Plant Growth Regulator Group, Bristol, pp 113–128.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carson, E. W. The plant root and its environment. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press; 1974.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chaney, R. L. Plant uptake of inorganic waste constituents. In: Parr, J. F.; Marsh, P. B., and Kla, J. M., ed. Land treatment of hazardous wastes. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corp. 1983:50–76.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cunningham, S. D.; Berti, W. R. Phytoremediation of contaminated soils: progress and promise. In: Symposium on bioremediation and bioprocessing, vol. 38, no. 2. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 1993.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Finklea, H.; Fontenot, M. Accelerated bioremediation of triazine contaminated soils—a practical case study. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Abstracts. 1993 Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, OH. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gordon, I.; Sojka, S. A.; Gordon, M. P. U.S. Patent application no. 369886; 1989.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Green, M. B.; Upton, J. Constructed reed beds: a cost effective way to polish wastewater effluents for small communities. In: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 65th annual conference and exposition. 9:13–24; 1992. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hanks, J.; Ritchie, J. T., editors. Modeling plant and soil systems. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, publ 31.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hartman, W. J., Jr. An evaluation of land treatment of municipal wastewater and physical siting of facility installations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Army, May 1975.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hatway, D. E. Molecular mechanism of herbicide selectivity. England: Oxford University Press; 1989.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hatzios, K. K.; Hoagland, R. E. Crop safeners for herbicides: development, uses and mechanisms of action. New York: Academic Press; 1989.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hawkes, H. E.; Webb, J. S. Geochemistry in mineral exploration. Harper and Row N.Y., N.Y.; 1962.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hsu, F. C.; Marxmiller, R. L.; Yang, A. Y. S. Study of root uptake and xylem translocation of cinmethylin and related compounds in detopped soybeans using a pressure chamber technique. Plant Physiol. 93:1573–1578; 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kingsley, M. T.; Metting, F. B. Jr.; Fredrickon, J. K.; Seidler, R. J. In situ stimulation vs. bioaugmentation: can plant inoculation enhance biodegradation of organic compounds. Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association’s 86th Annual meeting and conference. 93-WA-89.04. AWMA. 1993. Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Licht, L. A. Ecolotree cap: densely rooted trees for water management on landfill covers. In: Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association’s 86th Annual meeting and conference. Paper #A1549; 1993. Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McMullin, E. Absorbing idea. Calif. Farmer. Feb. 1993:20–24.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oyler, J. A. Remediation to metals-contaminated site near a zinc smelter using sludge/fly as amendments: herbaceous species. In: Hemphill, D. D., ed. Trace substances in environmental health-XXII. A symposium, Univ. of MO, Columbia; 1988. Univ of Missouri, Columbia.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Raloff, J. Greenery filters out indoor air pollution. Sci. News 136:212; 1989.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sandermann, H., Jr. Plant metabolism of xenobiotics. Trends Biochem. Sci. 17:82–84; 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sassaman, M. D.; Kauffman, T. R. Sludge dewatering and disposal utilizing the reed system. In: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 65th annual conference and exposition. 9:147–152; 1992. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shaw, A. J. Heavy metal tolerance in plants: evolutionary aspects. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1989.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shimp, J. F.; Tracy, J. C.; Davis, L. C., et al. Beneficial effects of plants in the remediation of soil and groundwater contaminated with organic compounds. CRC Crit. Rev. Environ. Control. In press; 1993.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tchobanoglous, G. Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal and reuse, 3rd ed. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. McGraw Hill; 1991:927–1002.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Design manual. Constructed wetlands and aquatic plant systems for municipal wastewater treatment. 625/11-88/022.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Utsunomiya, T. Japanese patent application publication. Application number 55-72959. Kokai; 1980:57–190.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wenzel, W. W.; Pollak, M. A.; Blum, W. E. H. Dynamics of heavy metals in soils of a reed bed system. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 46:1–3, 41–52; 1992.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wire Service Story. 134 Million trees to be planted to combat urban smog in Mexico City. Wilmington News Journal, Japan to loan for plantings. Sept. 29, 1992:A2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tissue Culture Association 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott D. Cunningham
    • 1
  • William R. Berti
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Research and DevelopmentNewark

Personalised recommendations