Summary
The development and application of in vitro alternatives designed to reduce or replace the use of animals, or to lessen the distress and discomfort of laboratory animals, is a rapidly developing trend in toxicology. However, at present there is no formal administrative process to organize, coordinate, or evaluate validation activities. A framework capable of fostering the validation of new methods is essential for the effective transfer of new technologic developments from the research laboratory into practical use. This committee has identified four essential validation resources: chemical bank(s), cell and tissue banks, a data bank, and reference laboratories. The creation of a Scientific Advisory Board composed of experts in the various aspects and endpoints of toxicity testing, and representing the academic, industrial, and regulatory communities, is recommended. Test validation acceptance is contingent on broad buy-in by disparate groups in the scientific community—academics, industry, and government. This is best achieved by early and frequent communication among parties and agreement on common goals. It is hoped that the creation of a validation infrastructure composed of the elements described in this report will facilitate scientific acceptance and utilization of alternative methodologies and speed implementation of replacement, reduction, and refinement alternatives in toxicity testing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anon. On the road to validation. Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing Newsletter 8(1); 1990.
Bagley, D. M. Eye irritation, reference chemicals data bank. Toxicol. In Vitro. In press; 1993.
Balls, M.; Blaauboer, B.; Busick, D., et al. Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures. Altern. Lab. Anim. 18:313–338; 1990.
Balls, M.; Botham, P.; Cordier, A., et al. Report and recommendations of an international workshop on promotion of the regulatory acceptance of validated non animal toxicity test procedures. Altern. Lab. Anim. 18:339–344; 1990.
Balls, M.; Southee, J.; Bridges, J. Animals and alternatives: present status and future prospects. London: Macmillan; 1990.
Balls, M.; Clothier, R. H. Comments on the scientific validation and regulatory acceptance of in vitro toxicity tests. Toxicol. In Vitro 5:535–538; 1991.
Balls, M.; Flint, O.; Wallum, E., editors. Alternatives to laboratory animals, vols. 1–20. Nottingham: FRAME, 1980–1992.
Balls, M.; Riddell, R. J.; Horner, S. A., et al. The FRAME approach to the development, validation, and evaluation of in vitro alternative methods. In: Goldberg, A. M., ed. Approaches to validation. Alternative methods in toxicology, vol. 5. New York, NY: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; 1987:45–58.
Blein, O.; Adolphe, M. A French project of correlation and validation of alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Toxicol. In Vitro 5:555–557; 1991.
Bondesson, I.; Ekwall, B.; Hellberg, S., et al. MIEC—a new international multicenter project to evaluate the relevance to human toxicity of in vitro cytotoxicity tests. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 5:331–348; 1989.
Bruner, L. H.; Shadduck, J.; Essex-Sorlie, D. Alternative methods for assessing the effects of chemicals in the eye. In: Hobson, W., ed. Dermal & ocular toxicology: fundamentals and methods. Boca Raton, LA: CRC Press; 1991:585–606.
Brusick, D. J. Technology transfer in toxicology. In: Goldberg, A. M., ed. In vitro toxicology: a progress report from CATT. Alternative methods in toxicology, vol. 3. New York: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; 1985:427–436.
Brusick, D. J., ed. In vitro toxicology: a journal of molecular and cellular toxicology, vols. 1–5. New York: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; 1986–1992.
Ekwall, B. Preliminary studies on the validity of in vitro measurement of drug toxicity using HeLa cells: lethal action to man of 43 drugs related to the HeLa cell toxicity of the lethal drug concentrations. Toxicol. Lett. 5:319–331; 1980.
Ekwall, B.; Bondesson, I.; Hellberg, S., et al. Validation of in vitro cytotoxicity tests—past and present strategies. Altern. Lab. Anim. 19:226–233; 1991.
Frazier, J. F. Scientific criteria for validation of in vitro toxicity tests. Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, environ. monogr. no. 36; 1990.
Frazier, J. F. Report on the CAAT/TCA workshop on the international status of validation of in vitro toxicity tests. CAAT technical rep. no. 5. In press; 1993.
Gad, S. C. Acute ocular irritation evaluation: in vivo and in vitro alternatives and making them the standard for testing. In: Mehlman, M. A., ed. Benchmarks: alternative methods in toxicology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1989:137–193.
Gad, S. C. Recent developments in replacing, reducing and refining animal use in toxicologic research. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 15:8–16; 1990.
Gettings, S. D.; Dipasquale, L. C.; Bagely, D. M., et al. The CTFA evaluation of alternatives program: an evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize primary eye irritation test. (Phase 1) Hydroalcoholic formulations; a preliminary communication. Toxicol. In Vitro 3:292–302; 1990.
Goldberg, A. M., editor Alternative methods in toxicology, vols. 1–9. New York: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; 1983–1993.
Goldberg, A. M., editor. A critical evaluation of alternatives to acute ocular irritation testing. Alternative methods in toxicology, vol. 4. New York: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 1987.
Green, S. Criteria for in vitro alternatives for the eye irritation test. Federal Chemical & Toxicology Journal 31:81–85; 1993.
Jacobs, M. E. Scientific issues in a regulatory evaluation of a new ocular safety test. Proceedings of the CTFA ocular safety testing workshop: in vivo and in vitro approaches. Washington, DC: The Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association; 1980:74–78.
Koch, W. H. Validation criteria for ocular irritation in vitro alternative tests. J. Toxicol. Cutaneous Ocul. Toxicol. 8:17–22; 1989.
McKeehan, W. L.; Sato, G. H.; Patterson Jr, M. K., eds. In vitro: cellular and developmental biology, vols. 1–28. Columbia, MD: Tissue Culture Association; 1965–1992.
Purchase, I. F. H. An international reference chemical data bank would accelerate the development, validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative toxicology tests. Altern. Lab. Anim. 18:345–348; 1990.
Purchase, I. F. H.; Hard, G. C., editors. Toxicology in vitro, vols 1–6. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press; 1987–1992.
Rundell, J. O. Validation as applied to in vitro toxicology. In: Goldberg, A. M., ed. Approaches to validation. Alternative methods in toxicology, vol. 5. New York: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; 1987:11–16.
Scala, R. A. Theoretical approaches to validation. In: Goldberg, A. M., ed. Approaches to validation. Alternative methods in toxicology, vol. 5. New York: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; 1987:1–10.
Spielman, H.; Gerner, I.; Kalweit, S., et al. Validation project of alternatives to the Draize test in Germany. Toxicol In Vitro 5:539–542; 1991.
Stark, D. M.; Shopsis, C.; Borenfreund, E., et al. Progress and problems in evaluating and validating alternative assays in toxicology. Food Chem. Toxicol. 24:449–455; 1986.
Weil, C. S.; Scala, R. A. Study of intra and interlaboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation tests. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 19:276–360; 1971.
Zanielli, R.; Priovano, R. Interlaboratory validation exercise on various in vitro cytotoxicity tests to be used for regulatory purposes for irritation labelling. Altern. Lab. Anim. 21(1):81–88; 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldberg, A.M., Frazier, J.M., Brusick, D. et al. Framework for validation and implementation of in vitro toxicity tests. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Animal 29, 688–692 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02631424
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02631424